Literature DB >> 22120203

Predicting others' actions via grasp and gaze: evidence for distinct brain networks.

Richard Ramsey1, Emily S Cross, Antonia F de C Hamilton.   

Abstract

During social interactions, how do we predict what other people are going to do next? One view is that we use our own motor experience to simulate and predict other people's actions. For example, when we see Sally look at a coffee cup or grasp a hammer, our own motor system provides a signal that anticipates her next action. Previous research has typically examined such gaze and grasp-based simulation processes separately, and it is not known whether similar cognitive and brain systems underpin the perception of object-directed gaze and grasp. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine to what extent gaze- and grasp-perception rely on common or distinct brain networks. Using a 'peeping window' protocol, we controlled what an observed actor could see and grasp. The actor could peep through one window to see if an object was present and reach through a different window to grasp the object. However, the actor could not peep and grasp at the same time. We compared gaze and grasp conditions where an object was present with matched conditions where the object was absent. When participants observed another person gaze at an object, left anterior inferior parietal lobule (aIPL) and parietal operculum showed a greater response than when the object was absent. In contrast, when participants observed the actor grasp an object, premotor, posterior parietal, fusiform and middle occipital brain regions showed a greater response than when the object was absent. These results point towards a division in the neural substrates for different types of motor simulation. We suggest that left aIPL and parietal operculum are involved in a predictive process that signals a future hand interaction with an object based on another person's eye gaze, whereas a broader set of brain areas, including parts of the action observation network, are engaged during observation of an ongoing object-directed hand action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22120203     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0393-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  59 in total

1.  Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Jari K Hietanen; Lauri Nummenmaa; Mikko J Nyman; Riitta Parkkola; Heikki Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Chris Frith
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Cortical regions involved in eye movements, shifts of attention, and gaze perception.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Grosbras; Angela R Laird; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of social attention.

Authors:  Lauri Nummenmaa; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The influence of visual training on predicting complex action sequences.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Waltraud Stadler; Jim Parkinson; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Following gaze: gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition.

Authors:  Stephen V Shepherd
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19

8.  Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: a new tool for social cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Elizabeth Redcay; David Dodell-Feder; Mark J Pearrow; Penelope L Mavros; Mario Kleiner; John D E Gabrieli; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Motor ontology in representing gaze-object relations.

Authors:  Andrea C Pierno; Cristina Becchio; Federico Tubaldi; Luca Turella; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  From observation to action simulation: the role of attention, eye-gaze, emotion, and body state.

Authors:  Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  9 in total

1.  Simulating and predicting others' actions.

Authors:  Anne Springer; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Emily S Cross
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-06-17

2.  Altered spontaneous brain activity in adolescent boys with pure conduct disorder revealed by regional homogeneity analysis.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Xiaocui Zhang; Daifeng Dong; Xiang Wang; Shuqiao Yao
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  Neural bases of antisocial behavior: a voxel-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuta Aoki; Ryota Inokuchi; Tomohiro Nakao; Hidenori Yamasue
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Gaze and body cues interplay during interactive requests.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Umberto Castiello; Silvia Guerra; Umberto Granziol; Giovanni Zani; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Repetitive Robot Behavior Impacts Perception of Intentionality and Gaze-Related Attentional Orienting.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Abubshait; Agnieszka Wykowska
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-11-09

6.  Emergence of perceptuomotor relationships during paleolithic stone toolmaking learning: intersections of observation and practice.

Authors:  Kristel Yu Tiamco Bayani; Nikhilesh Natraj; Nada Khresdish; Justin Pargeter; Dietrich Stout; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-11-11

7.  Visual experience determines the use of external reference frames in joint action control.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Roman Liepelt; Wolfgang Prinz; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Action simulation: time course and representational mechanisms.

Authors:  Anne Springer; Jim Parkinson; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-04

9.  Brain basis of communicative actions in language.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Yury Shtyrov; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.