Literature DB >> 33501118

Design and Evaluation of a Percutaneous Fragment Manipulation Device for Minimally Invasive Fracture Surgery.

Ioannis Georgilas1, Giulio Dagnino2, Beatriz Alves Martins3, Payam Tarassoli4, Samir Morad5, Konstantinos Georgilas6, Paul Koehler7, Roger Atkins4, Sanja Dogramadzi7.   

Abstract

Reduction of fractures in the minimally invasive (MI) manner can avoid risks associated with open fracture surgery. The MI approach requires specialized tools called percutaneous fragment manipulation devices (PFMD) to enable surgeons to safely grasp and manipulate fragments. PFMDs developed for long-bone manipulation are not suitable for intra-articular fractures where small bone fragments are involved. With this study, we offer a solution to potentially move the current fracture management practice closer to the use of a MI approach. We investigate the design and testing of a new PFMD design for manual as well as robot-assisted manipulation of small bone fragments. This new PFMD design is simulated using FEA in three loading scenarios (force/torque: 0 N/2.6 Nm, 75.7 N/3.5 N, 147 N/6.8 Nm) assessing structural properties, breaking points, and maximum bending deformations. The PFMD is tested in a laboratory setting on Sawbones models (0 N/2.6 Nm), and on ex-vivo swine samples (F = 80 N ± 8 N, F = 150 ± 15 N). A commercial optical tracking system was used for measuring PFMD deformations under external loading and the results were verified with an electromagnetic tracking system. The average error difference between the tracking systems was 0.5 mm, being within their accuracy limits. Final results from reduction maneuvers performed both manually and with the robot assistance are obtained from 7 human cadavers with reduction forces in the range of (F = 80 N ± 8 N, F = 150 ± 15 N, respectively). The results show that structurally, the system performs as predicted by the simulation results. The PFMD did not break during ex-vivo and cadaveric trials. Simulation, laboratory, and cadaveric tests produced similar results regarding the PFMD bending. Specifically, for forces applied perpendicularly to the axis of the PFMD of 80 N ± 8 N deformations of 2.8, 2.97, and 3.06 mm are measured on the PFMD, while forces of 150 ± 15 N produced deformations of 5.8, 4.44, and 5.19 mm. This study has demonstrated that the proposed PFMD undergoes predictable deformations under typical bone manipulation loads. Testing of the device on human cadavers proved that these deformations do not affect the anatomic reduction quality. The PFMD is, therefore, suitable to reliably achieve and maintain fracture reductions, and to, consequently, allow external fracture fixation.
Copyright © 2019 Georgilas, Dagnino, Alves Martins, Tarassoli, Morad, Georgilas, Koehler, Atkins and Dogramadzi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical testing; cadaveric trials; fracture reduction; robot-assisted orthopedic surgery; surgical tracking

Year:  2019        PMID: 33501118      PMCID: PMC7805645          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  21 in total

1.  Forces measured during spinal manipulative procedures in two age groups.

Authors:  M C Harms; S M Innes; D L Bader
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  The concept of locking plates.

Authors:  P Cronier; G Pietu; C Dujardin; N Bigorre; F Ducellier; R Gerard
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  Recovery of knee function following fracture of the tibial plateau.

Authors:  P Gaston; E M Will; J F Keating
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-09

4.  Complications of definitive open reduction and internal fixation of pilon fractures of the distal tibia.

Authors:  Philip A McCann; Mark Jackson; Steve T Mitchell; Roger M Atkins
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws.

Authors:  J R Chapman; R M Harrington; K M Lee; P A Anderson; A F Tencer; D Kowalski
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Enhanced fixation with hydroxyapatite coated pins.

Authors:  A Moroni; P Aspenberg; S Toksvig-Larsen; G Falzarano; S Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Vision-based real-time position control of a semi-automated system for robot-assisted joint fracture surgery.

Authors:  Giulio Dagnino; Ioannis Georgilas; Payam Tarassoli; Roger Atkins; Sanja Dogramadzi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Development of a fixation device for robot assisted fracture reduction of femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  T S Weber-Spickschen; M Oszwald; R Westphal; C Krettek; F Wahl; T Gosling
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.285

9.  Navigation system for robot-assisted intra-articular lower-limb fracture surgery.

Authors:  Giulio Dagnino; Ioannis Georgilas; Paul Köhler; Samir Morad; Roger Atkins; Sanja Dogramadzi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Intra-operative fiducial-based CT/fluoroscope image registration framework for image-guided robot-assisted joint fracture surgery.

Authors:  Giulio Dagnino; Ioannis Georgilas; Samir Morad; Peter Gibbons; Payam Tarassoli; Roger Atkins; Sanja Dogramadzi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.