Literature DB >> 33501008

High Classification Accuracy of a Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface for Stroke Rehabilitation Training.

Danut C Irimia1,2, Rupert Ortner1, Marian S Poboroniuc2, Bogdan E Ignat3, Christoph Guger1,4.   

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) extract commands in real-time and can be used to control a cursor, a robot or functional electrical stimulation (FES) devices. The control of FES devices is especially interesting for stroke rehabilitation, when a patient can use motor imagery to stimulate specific muscles in real-time. However, damage to motor areas resulting from stroke or other causes might impair control of a motor imagery BCI for rehabilitation. The current work presents a comparative evaluation of the MI-based BCI control accuracy between stroke patients and healthy subjects. Five patients who had a stroke that affected the motor system participated in the current study, and were trained across 10-24 sessions lasting about 1 h each with the recoveriX system. The participants' EEG data were classified while they imagined left or right hand movements, and real-time feedback was provided on a monitor. If the correct imagination was detected, the FES was also activated to move the left or right hand. The grand average mean accuracy was 87.4% for all patients and sessions. All patients were able to achieve at least one session with a maximum accuracy above 96%. Both the mean accuracy and the maximum accuracy were surprisingly high and above results seen with healthy controls in prior studies. Importantly, the study showed that stroke patients can control a MI BCI system with high accuracy relative to healthy persons. This may occur because these patients are highly motivated to participate in a study to improve their motor functions. Participants often reported early in the training of motor improvements and this caused additional motivation. However, it also reflects the efficacy of combining motor imagination, seeing continuous bar feedback, and real hand movement that also activates the tactile and proprioceptive systems. Results also suggested that motor function could improve even if classification accuracy did not, and suggest other new questions to explore in future work. Future studies will also be done with a first-person view 3D avatar to provide improved feedback and thereby increase each patients' sense of engagement.
Copyright © 2018 Irimia, Ortner, Poboroniuc, Ignat and Guger.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain-computer interface; classification accuracy; motor imagery; rehabilitation; stroke

Year:  2018        PMID: 33501008      PMCID: PMC7805943          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  23 in total

1.  Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial EEG classification in a movement task.

Authors:  J Müller-Gerking; G Pfurtscheller; H Flyvbjerg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement.

Authors:  H Ramoser; J Müller-Gerking; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  2000-12

3.  Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study.

Authors:  Damian Cruse; Srivas Chennu; Camille Chatelle; Tristan A Bekinschtein; Davinia Fernández-Espejo; John D Pickard; Steven Laureys; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?

Authors:  C Guger; G Edlinger; W Harkam; I Niedermayer; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke.

Authors:  Earllaine Croarkin; Jerome Danoff; Candice Barnes
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2004-01

6.  Online binary decision decoding using functional near-infrared spectroscopy for the development of brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Noman Naseer; Melissa Jiyoun Hong; Keum-Shik Hong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface training: the impact on motor cortical responsiveness.

Authors:  F Pichiorri; F De Vico Fallani; F Cincotti; F Babiloni; M Molinari; S C Kleih; C Neuper; A Kübler; D Mattia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Brain-machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke.

Authors:  Surjo R Soekadar; Niels Birbaumer; Marc W Slutzky; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.996

9.  Towards a cure for BCI illiteracy.

Authors:  Carmen Vidaurre; Benjamin Blankertz
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  A motor imagery based brain-computer interface for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  R Ortner; D-C Irimia; J Scharinger; C Guger
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2012
View more
  3 in total

1.  Optimizing Motor Imagery Parameters for Robotic Arm Control by Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Ünal Hayta; Danut Constantin Irimia; Christoph Guger; İbrahim Erkutlu; İbrahim Halil Güzelbey
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-26

2.  Decoding EEG rhythms offline and online during motor imagery for standing and sitting based on a brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Nayid Triana-Guzman; Alvaro D Orjuela-Cañon; Andres L Jutinico; Omar Mendoza-Montoya; Javier M Antelis
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  EEG Biomarkers Related With the Functional State of Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Marc Sebastián-Romagosa; Esther Udina; Rupert Ortner; Josep Dinarès-Ferran; Woosang Cho; Nensi Murovec; Clara Matencio-Peralba; Sebastian Sieghartsleitner; Brendan Z Allison; Christoph Guger
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.