Literature DB >> 33500743

Accuracy and Precision Evaluation of International Standard Spherical Model by Digital Dental Scanners.

Hong Xin Cai1, Qi Jia1, HaoYu Shi1, Yujie Jiang1, Jingnan Xue1, ChunXu Chen1, Haotian Gong1, Jie Liu1, Eui-Seok Lee2, Heng Bo Jiang1.   

Abstract

With the popularization of digital technology and the exposure of traditional technology's defects, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) has been widely used in the field of dentistry. And the accuracy of the scanning system determines the ultimate accuracy of the prosthesis, which is a very important part of CAD/CAM, so we decided to evaluate the accuracy of the intraoral and extraoral scanners. In this study, we selected the sphere model as the scanning object and obtained the final result through data analysis and 3D fitting. In terms of trueness and precision, the scanner of SHINING was significantly different from that of others; however, there was no significant difference between TRIOS and CEREC. SHINING showed the lowest level of accuracy, with CEREC slightly lower than TRIOS. The sphere model has also been proven to be scanned successfully.
Copyright © 2020 Hong Xin Cai et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33500743      PMCID: PMC7787873          DOI: 10.1155/2020/1714642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scanning        ISSN: 0161-0457            Impact factor:   1.932


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models.

Authors:  Margherita Santoro; Scott Galkin; Monica Teredesai; Olivier F Nicolay; Thomas J Cangialosi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 2.  The future of dental devices is digital.

Authors:  Richard van Noort
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.

Authors:  Tabea V Flügge; Stefan Schlager; Katja Nelson; Susanne Nahles; Marc C Metzger
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.

Authors:  Andrew P Keating; Jeremy Knox; Richard Bibb; Alexei I Zhurov
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2008-09

5.  Performance and perception of dental students using three intraoral CAD/CAM scanners for full-arch scanning.

Authors:  Khaled E Ahmed; Ting Wang; Kar Yan Li; Wai Kuen Luk; Michael F Burrow
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.642

Review 6.  Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors.

Authors:  J Abduo; M Elseyoufi
Journal:  Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent       Date:  2018-08-30

7.  Comparison of intraoral and extraoral scanners on the accuracy of digital model articulation.

Authors:  Jason L Porter; Caroline K Carrico; Steven J Lindauer; Eser Tüfekçi
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-19

8.  Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burzynski; Allen R Firestone; F Michael Beck; Henry W Fields; Toru Deguchi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Mario Imburgia; Silvia Logozzo; Uli Hauschild; Giovanni Veronesi; Carlo Mangano; Francesco Guido Mangano
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners.

Authors:  Jiyoun Maeng; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the impact of reference tooth morphology and alignment on model measurement accuracy.

Authors:  Zhi Mao; Yi-Fan Jia; Yi-Fan Zhang; Jing Xu; Zhi-Na Wu; Feng Mao; Yi Zhang; Min Hu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

2.  Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards.

Authors:  Naiyu Cui; Jiayin Wang; Xingyu Hou; Shixun Sun; Qixuan Huang; Ho-Kyung Lim; HongXin Cai; Qi Jia; Eui-Seok Lee; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.932

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.