Literature DB >> 33500538

Sharing genetic variants with the NGS pipeline is essential for effective genomic data sharing and reproducibility in health information exchange.

Jeong Hoon Lee1,2, Solbi Kweon2, Yu Rang Park3.   

Abstract

Genetic variants causing underlying pharmacogenetic and disease phenotypes have been used as the basis for clinical decision-making. However, due to the lack of standards for next-generation sequencing (NGS) pipelines, reproducing genetic variants among institutions is still difficult. The aim of this study is to show how many important variants for clinical decisions can be individually detected using different pipelines. Genetic variants were derived from 105 breast cancer patient target DNA sequences via three different variant-calling pipelines. HaplotypeCaller, Mutect2 tumor-only mode in the Genome Analysis ToolKit (GATK), and VarScan were used in variant calling from the sequence read data processed by the same NGS preprocessing tools using Variant Effect Predictor. GATK HaplotypeCaller, VarScan, and MuTect2 found 25,130, 16,972, and 4232 variants, comprising 1491, 1400, and 321 annotated variants with ClinVar significance, respectively. The average number of ClinVar significant variants in the patients was 769.43, 16.50% of the variants were detected by only one variant caller. Despite variants with significant impact on clinical decision-making, the detected variants are different for each algorithm. To utilize genetic variants in the clinical field, a strict standard for NGS pipelines is essential.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33500538      PMCID: PMC7838410          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82006-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  36 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Mutational spectrum of smith-lemli-opitz syndrome patients in hungary.

Authors:  I Balogh; K Koczok; G P Szabó; O Török; K Hadzsiev; G Csábi; L Balogh; E Dzsudzsák; E Ajzner; L Szabó; V Csákváry; A V Oláh
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2012-11-09

3.  Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR): correlation between genotype and phenotype.

Authors:  V Dumur; R Gervais; J M Rigot; E Delomel-Vinner; B Decaestecker; J J Lafitte; P Roussel
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Lumacaftor and ivacaftor in the management of patients with cystic fibrosis: current evidence and future prospects.

Authors:  Kelly Kuk; Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.031

5.  Points to consider for sharing variant-level information from clinical genetic testing with ClinVar.

Authors:  Danielle R Azzariti; Erin Rooney Riggs; Christa L Martin; Heidi L Rehm; Annie Niehaus; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Erin M Ramos; Brandi Kattman; Melissa J Landrum
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2018-02-01

6.  Evaluation of exome variants using the Ion Proton Platform to sequence error-prone regions.

Authors:  Heewon Seo; Yoomi Park; Byung Joo Min; Myung Eui Seo; Ju Han Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The reproducibility crisis in the age of digital medicine.

Authors:  Aaron Stupple; David Singerman; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-01-29

8.  Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples.

Authors:  Kristian Cibulskis; Michael S Lawrence; Scott L Carter; Andrey Sivachenko; David Jaffe; Carrie Sougnez; Stacey Gabriel; Matthew Meyerson; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants.

Authors:  Melissa J Landrum; Jennifer M Lee; Mark Benson; Garth Brown; Chen Chao; Shanmuga Chitipiralla; Baoshan Gu; Jennifer Hart; Douglas Hoffman; Jeffrey Hoover; Wonhee Jang; Kenneth Katz; Michael Ovetsky; George Riley; Amanjeev Sethi; Ray Tully; Ricardo Villamarin-Salomon; Wendy Rubinstein; Donna R Maglott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.

Authors:  Sohyun Hwang; Eiru Kim; Insuk Lee; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  The evaluation of Bcftools mpileup and GATK HaplotypeCaller for variant calling in non-human species.

Authors:  Messaoud Lefouili; Kiwoong Nam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.