Literature DB >> 33500510

Simulating thoughts to measure and study internal attention in mental health.

Iftach Amir1, Liad Ruimi1, Amit Bernstein2.   

Abstract

Our mind's eye and the role of internal attention in mental life and suffering has intrigued scholars for centuries. Yet, experimental study of internal attention has been elusive due to our limited capacity to control the timing and content of internal stimuli. We thus developed the Simulated Thoughts Paradigm (STP) to experimentally deliver own-voice thought stimuli that simulate the content and experience of thinking and thereby experimental study of internal attentional processes. In independent experiments (N = 122) integrating STP into established cognitive-experimental tasks, we found and replicated evidence that emotional reactivity to negative thoughts predicts difficulty disengaging internal attention from, as well as biased selective internal attention of, those thoughts; these internal attention processes predict cognitive vulnerability (e.g., negative repetitive thinking) which thereby predict anxiety and depression. Proposed methods and findings may have implications for the study of information processing and attention in mental health broadly and models of internal attentional (dys)control in cognitive vulnerability and mental health more specifically.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33500510      PMCID: PMC7838298          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81756-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  79 in total

1.  Neural substrates for recognition of familiar voices: a PET study.

Authors:  K Nakamura; R Kawashima; M Sugiura; T Kato; A Nakamura; K Hatano; S Nagumo; K Kubota; H Fukuda; K Ito; S Kojima
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation.

Authors:  J F Thayer; R D Lane
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

Review 4.  A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety.

Authors:  Bram Van Bockstaele; Bruno Verschuere; Helen Tibboel; Jan De Houwer; Geert Crombez; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?

Authors:  Richard J McNally
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

Review 6.  Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 8.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

9.  A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake.

Authors:  S Nolen-Hoeksema; J Morrow
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1991-07

10.  Neurocognitive intra-individual variability in mood disorders: effects on attentional response time distributions.

Authors:  P Gallagher; J Nilsson; A Finkelmeyer; M Goshawk; K A Macritchie; A J Lloyd; J M Thompson; R J Porter; A H Young; I N Ferrier; R H McAllister-Williams; S Watson
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quality of Life Changes Following the Onset of Cerebellar Ataxia: Symptoms and Concerns Self-reported by Ataxia Patients and Informants.

Authors:  Michelle R Joyce; Prianca A Nadkarni; Sharif I Kronemer; Michael J Margron; Mitchell B Slapik; Owen P Morgan; Liana S Rosenthal; Chiadi U Onyike; Cherie L Marvel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.648

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.