Literature DB >> 33500460

Modality-specific improvements in sensory processing among baseball players.

Koya Yamashiro1,2, Yudai Yamazaki3,4, Kanako Siiya4, Koyuki Ikarashi3,4, Yasuhiro Baba4, Naofumi Otsuru3,5, Hideaki Onishi3,5, Daisuke Sato3,4.   

Abstract

Long-term skills training is known to induce neuroplastic alterations, but it is still debated whether these changes are always modality-specific or can be supramodal components. To address this issue, we compared finger-targeted somatosensory-evoked and auditory-evoked potentials under both Go (response) and Nogo (response inhibition) conditions between 10 baseball players, who require fine hand/digit skills and response inhibition, to 12 matched track and field (T&F) athletes. Electroencephalograms were obtained at nine cortical electrode positions. Go potentials, Nogo potentials, and Go/Nogo reaction time (Go/Nogo RT) were measured during equiprobable somatosensory and auditory Go/Nogo paradigms. Nogo potentials were obtained by subtracting Go trial from Nogo trial responses. Somatosensory Go P100 latency and Go/Nogo RT were significantly shorter in the baseball group than the T&F group, while auditory Go N100 latency and Go/Nogo RT did not differ between groups. Additionally, somatosensory subtracted Nogo N2 latency was significantly shorter in the baseball group than the T&F group. Furthermore, there were significant positive correlations between somatosensory Go/Nogo RT and both Go P100 latency and subtracted Nogo N2 latency, but no significant correlations among auditory responses. We speculate that long-term skills training induce predominantly modality-specific neuroplastic changes that can improve both execution and response inhibition.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33500460      PMCID: PMC7838195          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81852-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  36 in total

1.  The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control.

Authors:  A J Fallgatter; W K Strik
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Characteristics of No-go-P300 component during somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Intensive baseball practice improves the Go/Nogo reaction time, but not the simple reaction time.

Authors:  Noriyuki Kida; Shingo Oda; Michikazu Matsumura
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-02

4.  Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.

Authors:  Janette L Smith; Stuart J Johnstone; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Effects of ISI and stimulus probability on event-related go/nogo potentials after somatosensory stimulation.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Koji Inui; Toshiaki Wasaka; Yohei Tamura; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A supramodal network for response inhibition.

Authors:  Stephan Walther; Roberto Goya-Maldonado; Christoph Stippich; Matthias Weisbrod; Stefan Kaiser
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Different proactive and reactive action control in fencers' and boxers' brain.

Authors:  Valentina Bianco; Francesco Di Russo; Rinaldo Livio Perri; Marika Berchicci
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals the neural substrates of arm transport and grip formation in reach-to-grasp actions in humans.

Authors:  Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Simona Monaco; Patrizia Fattori; Claudio Galletti; Teresa D McAdam; Derek J Quinlan; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A transition from unimodal to multimodal activations in four sensory modalities in humans: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Emi Tanaka; Koji Inui; Tetsuo Kida; Takahiro Miyazaki; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  3 in total

1.  Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Miho Takezawa; Keita Kamijo; Manabu Shibasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The field of expertise modulates the time course of neural processes associated with inhibitory control in a sport decision-making task.

Authors:  Marie Simonet; Paolo Ruggeri; Etienne Sallard; Jérôme Barral
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials as a Marker of Functional Neuroplasticity in Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tom Maudrich; Susanne Hähner; Rouven Kenville; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.