Literature DB >> 16214250

Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.

Janette L Smith1, Stuart J Johnstone, Robert J Barry.   

Abstract

The cued Go/NoGo task elicits response preparation during the foreperiod, and, depending on the S2 signal, either response execution or inhibition. This study aimed to determine how processes in the foreperiod might affect or predict post-S2 processing. Thirty-two adults participated in a cued Go/NoGo task (50% Go), with a median split of mean RT producing "Fast" and "Slow" groups. ERP measures were subjected to both ANOVA and regression techniques. There were no differences in the NoGo N2 effect related to response speed, nor was the effect related to pre-S2 processes. The anterior shift of the NoGo P3 was larger in the Fast group, and while the late CNV was associated with the absolute amplitude of both Go and NoGo P3, it was not related to the anterior-posterior Go/NoGo differences. Together, these data suggest that the inhibitory process may be reflected in the NoGo P3 effect, rather than the NoGo N2 effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16214250     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  31 in total

1.  The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The role of chunk tightness and chunk familiarity in problem solving: evidence from ERPs and fMRI.

Authors:  Lili Wu; Guenther Knoblich; Jing Luo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Different inhibitory control components predict different levels of language control in bilinguals.

Authors:  Shuhua Li; Mona Roxana Botezatu; Man Zhang; Taomei Guo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 5.  Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: evidence from neurophysiology and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  How semantic categorization influences inhibitory processing in middle-childhood: an Event Related Potentials study.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Joshua White; Matthew R Brier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  The influence of perceptual and semantic categorization on inhibitory processing as measured by the N2-P3 response.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Matthew R Brier; Patricia S Moore; Thomas C Ferree; Dylan Ray; Stewart Mostofsky; John Hart; Michael A Kraut
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Impulsiveness and ERP components in a Go/Nogo task.

Authors:  Martin Ruchsow; Georg Groen; Markus Kiefer; Leopold Hermle; Manfred Spitzer; Michael Falkenstein
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Response inhibition in borderline personality disorder: event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task.

Authors:  M Ruchsow; G Groen; M Kiefer; A Buchheim; H Walter; P Martius; M Reiter; L Hermle; M Spitzer; D Ebert; M Falkenstein
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Delta, theta, and alpha event-related oscillations in alcoholics during Go/NoGo task: Neurocognitive deficits in execution, inhibition, and attention processing.

Authors:  Ashwini K Pandey; Chella Kamarajan; Niklas Manz; David B Chorlian; Arthur Stimus; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 5.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.