J Henry Brems1, Jonathan D Casey2, Li Wang3, Wesley H Self4, Todd W Rice2, Matthew W Semler2. 1. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States. Electronic address: john.h.brems@vumc.org. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine if balanced crystalloids compared with saline improve outcomes in critically ill adults admitted with low plasma bicarbonate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial (SMART). We included patients who presented to the Emergency Department with a first measured plasma bicarbonate less than 20 mmol/L. Among these patients, we compared the effect of balanced crystalloid versus saline on the primary outcome of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30), defined as a composite of death, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction (final inpatient creatinine ≥200% baseline). Secondary outcomes included 30 day in-hospital mortality, receipt of new RRT, persistent renal dysfunction, incident AKI, and vasopressor-free days. RESULTS: Among the 2029 patients with an initial plasma bicarbonate concentration < 20 mmol/L, there was no difference in the incidence of MAKE30 between those assigned to balanced crystalloid versus saline (21.8% vs 21.3%; P = 0.93). Secondary outcomes were similar between the balanced crystalloid and saline groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults presenting to the Emergency Department, initial plasma bicarbonate concentration does not appear to be a useful marker to guide the selection of balanced crystalloid versus saline.
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine if balanced crystalloids compared with saline improve outcomes in critically ill adults admitted with low plasma bicarbonate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial (SMART). We included patients who presented to the Emergency Department with a first measured plasma bicarbonate less than 20 mmol/L. Among these patients, we compared the effect of balanced crystalloid versus saline on the primary outcome of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30), defined as a composite of death, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction (final inpatient creatinine ≥200% baseline). Secondary outcomes included 30 day in-hospital mortality, receipt of new RRT, persistent renal dysfunction, incident AKI, and vasopressor-free days. RESULTS: Among the 2029 patients with an initial plasma bicarbonate concentration < 20 mmol/L, there was no difference in the incidence of MAKE30 between those assigned to balanced crystalloid versus saline (21.8% vs 21.3%; P = 0.93). Secondary outcomes were similar between the balanced crystalloid and saline groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults presenting to the Emergency Department, initial plasma bicarbonate concentration does not appear to be a useful marker to guide the selection of balanced crystalloid versus saline.
Authors: Nor'azim Mohd Yunos; In Byung Kim; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael Bailey; Lisa Ho; David Story; Geoff A Gutteridge; Graeme K Hart Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Matthew W Semler; Wesley H Self; Jonathan P Wanderer; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Li Wang; Daniel W Byrne; Joanna L Stollings; Avinash B Kumar; Christopher G Hughes; Antonio Hernandez; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Addison K May; Liza Weavind; Jonathan D Casey; Edward D Siew; Andrew D Shaw; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kamal Maheshwari; Alparslan Turan; Natalya Makarova; Chao Ma; Wael Ali Sakr Esa; Kurt Ruetzler; Sabri Barsoum; Alan G Kuhel; Michael R Ritchey; Carlos Higuera-Rueda; Tatyana Kopyeva; Luca Stocchi; Hani Essber; Barak Cohen; Iman Suleiman; Gausan R Bajracharya; David Chelnick; Edward J Mascha; Andrea Kurz; Daniel I Sessler Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kathryn Maitland; Elizabeth C George; Jennifer A Evans; Sarah Kiguli; Peter Olupot-Olupot; Samuel O Akech; Robert O Opoka; Charles Engoru; Richard Nyeko; George Mtove; Hugh Reyburn; Bernadette Brent; Julius Nteziyaremye; Ayub Mpoya; Natalie Prevatt; Cornelius M Dambisya; Daniel Semakula; Ahmed Ddungu; Vicent Okuuny; Ronald Wokulira; Molline Timbwa; Benedict Otii; Michael Levin; Jane Crawley; Abdel G Babiker; Diana M Gibb Journal: BMC Med Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 11.150
Authors: Joseph Bledsoe; Ithan D Peltan; R J Bunnell; Samuel M Brown; Al Jephson; Danielle Groat; Nicholas M Levin; Emily Wilson; Jon Newbold; Gabriel V Fontaine; Joe Frandsen; David Hasleton; Paul Krakovitz; Kim Brunisholz; Todd Allen Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-05-02