Literature DB >> 21705897

The biochemical effects of restricting chloride-rich fluids in intensive care.

Nor'azim Mohd Yunos1, In Byung Kim, Rinaldo Bellomo, Michael Bailey, Lisa Ho, David Story, Geoff A Gutteridge, Graeme K Hart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the biochemical effects of restricting the use of chloride-rich intravenous fluids in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, before-and-after study.
SETTING: University-affiliated intensive care unit. PATIENTS: A cohort of 828 consecutive patients admitted over 6 months from February 2008 and cohort of 816 consecutive patients admitted over 6 months from February 2009.
INTERVENTIONS: We collected biochemical and fluid use data during standard practice without clinician awareness. After a 6-month period of education and preparation, we restricted the use of chloride-rich fluids (0.9% saline [Baxter, Sydney, Australia], Gelofusine [BBraun, Melsungen, Germany], and Albumex 4 [CSL Bioplasma, Melbourne, Australia]) in the intensive care unit and made them available only on specific intensive care unit specialist prescription.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Saline prescription decreased from 2411 L in the control group to 52 L in the intervention group (p < .001), Gelofusine from 538 to 0 L (p < .001), and Albumex 4 from 269 to 80 L (p < .001). As expected, Hartmann's lactated solution prescription increased from 469 to 3205 L (p < .001), Plasma-Lyte from 65 to 160 L (p < .05), and chloride-poor Albumex 20 from 87 to 268 L (p < .001). After intervention, the incidence of severe metabolic acidosis (standard base excess <-5 mEq/L) decreased from 9.1% to 6.0% (p < .001) and severe acidemia (pH <7.3) from 6.0% to 4.9% (p < .001). However, the intervention also led to significantly greater incidence of severe metabolic alkalosis (standard base excess >5 mEq/L) and alkalemia (pH >7.5) with an increase from 25.4% to 32.8% and 10.5% to 14.7%, respectively (p < .001). The time-weighted mean chloride level decreased from 104.9 ± 4.9 to 102.5 ± 4.6 mmol/L (p < .001), whereas the time-weighted mean standard base excess increased from 0.5 ± 4.5 to 1.8 ± 4.7 mmol/L (p < .001), mean bicarbonate from 25.3 ± 4.0 to 26.4 ± 4.1 mmol/L (p < .001) and mean pH from 7.40 ± 0.06 to 7.42 ± 0.06 (p < .001). Overall fluid costs decreased from $15,077 (U.S.) to $3,915.
CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary intensive care unit in Australia, restricting the use of chloride-rich fluids significantly affected electrolyte and acid-base status. The choice of fluids significantly modulates acid-base status in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21705897     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822571e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  46 in total

1.  Chloride Content of Fluids Used for Large-Volume Resuscitation Is Associated With Reduced Survival.

Authors:  Ayan Sen; Christopher M Keener; Florentina E Sileanu; Emily Foldes; Gilles Clermont; Raghavan Murugan; John A Kellum
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  Fluid type and the use of renal replacement therapy in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Rochwerg; W Alhazzani; A Gibson; C M Ribic; A Sindi; D Heels-Ansdell; L Thabane; A Fox-Robichaud; L Mbuagbaw; W Szczeklik; F Alshamsi; S Altayyar; W Ip; G Li; M Wang; A Włudarczyk; Q Zhou; D Annane; D J Cook; R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Resuscitation fluid use in Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Units between 2007 and 2013.

Authors:  N E Hammond; C Taylor; M Saxena; B Liu; S Finfer; P Glass; I Seppelt; L Willenberg; J Myburgh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Acute kidney injury-epidemiology, outcomes and economics.

Authors:  Oleksa Rewa; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  Controversies in fluid therapy: Type, dose and toxicity.

Authors:  Robert C McDermid; Karthik Raghunathan; Adam Romanovsky; Andrew D Shaw; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02-04

6.  Effects of restricting perioperative use of intravenous chloride on kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: the LICRA pragmatic controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  David McIlroy; Deirdre Murphy; Jessica Kasza; Dhiraj Bhatia; Lisa Wutzlhofer; Silvana Marasco
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in the Intensive Care Unit. The SALT Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthew W Semler; Jonathan P Wanderer; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Joanna L Stollings; Wesley H Self; Edward D Siew; Li Wang; Daniel W Byrne; Andrew D Shaw; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Frequency of fluid overload and usefulness of bioimpedance in patients requiring intensive care for sepsis syndromes.

Authors:  Timothy R Larsen; Gurbir Singh; Victor Velocci; Mohamed Nasser; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2016-01

Review 9.  Fluid management for the prevention and attenuation of acute kidney injury.

Authors:  John R Prowle; Christopher J Kirwan; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 28.314

10.  Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W Semler; Wesley H Self; Todd W Rice
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.