Raphael Eisenhofer1,2, Kristofer M Helgen3,4, David Taggart5,6. 1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Raph.eisenhofer@gmail.com. 2. Australian Research Council Centre for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Raph.eisenhofer@gmail.com. 3. Australian Museum Research Institute, 1 William St, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Australian Research Council Centre for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 5. School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Waite), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 6. FAUNA Research Alliance, PO Box 5092, Kahibah, NSW, 2290, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Herbivorous mammals co-opt microbes to derive energy and nutrients from diets that are recalcitrant to host enzymes. Recent research has found that captive management-an important conservation tool for many species-can alter the gut microbiota of mammals. Such changes could negatively impact the ability of herbivorous mammals to derive energy from their native diets, and ultimately reduce host fitness. To date, nothing is known of how captivity influences the gut microbiota of the Southern Hairy-nosed Wombat (SHNW), a large herbivorous marsupial that inhabits South Australia. Here, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized the faecal microbiota of SHNWs in captivity and from three wild populations, two from degraded habitats and one from an intact native grass habitat. RESULTS: We found that captive SHNWs had gut microbiota that were compositionally different and less diverse compared to wild SHNWs. There were major differences in gut microbiota community membership between captive and wild animals, both in statistically significant changes in relative abundance of microbes, and in the presence/absence of microbes. We also observed differences in microbial composition between wild populations, with the largest difference associated with native vs. degraded habitat. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that captivity has a major impact on the gut microbiota of SHNWs, and that different wild populations harbour distinct microbial compositions. Such findings warrant further work to determine what impacts these changes have on the fitness of SHNWs, and whether they could be manipulated to improve future management of the species.
BACKGROUND: Herbivorous mammals co-opt microbes to derive energy and nutrients from diets that are recalcitrant to host enzymes. Recent research has found that captive management-an important conservation tool for many species-can alter the gut microbiota of mammals. Such changes could negatively impact the ability of herbivorous mammals to derive energy from their native diets, and ultimately reduce host fitness. To date, nothing is known of how captivity influences the gut microbiota of the Southern Hairy-nosed Wombat (SHNW), a large herbivorous marsupial that inhabits South Australia. Here, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized the faecal microbiota of SHNWs in captivity and from three wild populations, two from degraded habitats and one from an intact native grass habitat. RESULTS: We found that captive SHNWs had gut microbiota that were compositionally different and less diverse compared to wild SHNWs. There were major differences in gut microbiota community membership between captive and wild animals, both in statistically significant changes in relative abundance of microbes, and in the presence/absence of microbes. We also observed differences in microbial composition between wild populations, with the largest difference associated with native vs. degraded habitat. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that captivity has a major impact on the gut microbiota of SHNWs, and that different wild populations harbour distinct microbial compositions. Such findings warrant further work to determine what impacts these changes have on the fitness of SHNWs, and whether they could be manipulated to improve future management of the species.
Authors: Margaret McFall-Ngai; Michael G Hadfield; Thomas C G Bosch; Hannah V Carey; Tomislav Domazet-Lošo; Angela E Douglas; Nicole Dubilier; Gerard Eberl; Tadashi Fukami; Scott F Gilbert; Ute Hentschel; Nicole King; Staffan Kjelleberg; Andrew H Knoll; Natacha Kremer; Sarkis K Mazmanian; Jessica L Metcalf; Kenneth Nealson; Naomi E Pierce; John F Rawls; Ann Reid; Edward G Ruby; Mary Rumpho; Jon G Sanders; Diethard Tautz; Jennifer J Wernegreen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Amnon Amir; Daniel McDonald; Jose A Navas-Molina; Evguenia Kopylova; James T Morton; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Eric P Kightley; Luke R Thompson; Embriette R Hyde; Antonio Gonzalez; Rob Knight Journal: mSystems Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 6.496
Authors: Luke R Thompson; Jon G Sanders; Daniel McDonald; Amnon Amir; Joshua Ladau; Kenneth J Locey; Robert J Prill; Anupriya Tripathi; Sean M Gibbons; Gail Ackermann; Jose A Navas-Molina; Stefan Janssen; Evguenia Kopylova; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Antonio González; James T Morton; Siavash Mirarab; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Lingjing Jiang; Mohamed F Haroon; Jad Kanbar; Qiyun Zhu; Se Jin Song; Tomasz Kosciolek; Nicholas A Bokulich; Joshua Lefler; Colin J Brislawn; Gregory Humphrey; Sarah M Owens; Jarrad Hampton-Marcell; Donna Berg-Lyons; Valerie McKenzie; Noah Fierer; Jed A Fuhrman; Aaron Clauset; Rick L Stevens; Ashley Shade; Katherine S Pollard; Kelly D Goodwin; Janet K Jansson; Jack A Gilbert; Rob Knight Journal: Nature Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kylie L Brice; Pankaj Trivedi; Thomas C Jeffries; Michaela D J Blyton; Christopher Mitchell; Brajesh K Singh; Ben D Moore Journal: PeerJ Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Valerie J McKenzie; Se Jin Song; Frédéric Delsuc; Tiffany L Prest; Angela M Oliverio; Timothy M Korpita; Alexandra Alexiev; Katherine R Amato; Jessica L Metcalf; Martin Kowalewski; Nico L Avenant; Andres Link; Anthony Di Fiore; Andaine Seguin-Orlando; Claudia Feh; Ludovic Orlando; Joseph R Mendelson; Jon Sanders; Rob Knight Journal: Integr Comp Biol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 3.326
Authors: Amanda Camp; Adam E Croxford; Caroline S Ford; Ute Baumann; Peter R Clements; Stefan Hiendleder; Lucy Woolford; Gabrielle Netzel; Wayne S J Boardman; Mary T Fletcher; Mike J Wilkinson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240