Literature DB >> 29111601

Active migration is associated with specific and consistent changes to gut microbiota in Calidris shorebirds.

Alice Risely1, David W Waite2, Beata Ujvari1, Bethany J Hoye1,3, Marcel Klaassen1.   

Abstract

Gut microbes are increasingly recognised for their role in regulating an animal's metabolism and immunity. However, identifying repeatable associations between host physiological processes and their gut microbiota has proved challenging, in part because microbial communities often respond stochastically to host physiological stress (e.g. fasting, forced exercise or infection). Migratory birds provide a valuable system in which to test host-microbe interactions under physiological extremes because these hosts are adapted to predictable metabolic and immunological challenges as they undergo seasonal migrations, including temporary gut atrophy during long-distance flights. These physiological challenges may either temporarily disrupt gut microbial ecosystems, or, alternatively, promote predictable host-microbe associations during migration. To determine the relationship between migration and gut microbiota, we compared gut microbiota composition between migrating and non-migrating ("resident") conspecific shorebirds sharing a flock. We performed this across two sandpiper species, Calidris ferruginea and Calidris ruficollis, in north-western Australia, and an additional C. ruficollis population 3,000 km away in southern Australia. We found that migrants consistently had higher abundances of the bacterial genus Corynebacterium (average 28% abundance) compared to conspecific residents (average <1% abundance), with this effect holding across both species and sites. However, other than this specific association, community structure and diversity was almost identical between migrants and residents, with migration status accounting for only 1% of gut community variation when excluding Corynebacterium. Our findings suggest a consistent relationship between Corynebacterium and Calidris shorebirds during migration, with further research required to identify causal mechanisms behind the association, and to elucidate functionality to the host. However, outside this specific association, migrating shorebirds broadly maintained gut community structure, which may allow them to quickly recover gut function after a migratory flight. This study provides a rare example of a repeatable and specific response of the gut microbiota to a major physiological challenge across two species and two distant populations.
© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gut microbiota; host-microbe interactions; microbiome; migration; physiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29111601     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  22 in total

Review 1.  The gut microbiome as a driver of individual variation in cognition and functional behaviour.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Amy C Cooke; Crystal N Johnson; John L Quinn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Microbial communities in hummingbird feeders are distinct from floral nectar and influenced by bird visitation.

Authors:  Casie Lee; Lisa A Tell; Tiffany Hilfer; Rachel L Vannette
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A bird's-eye view of phylosymbiosis: weak signatures of phylosymbiosis among all 15 species of cranes.

Authors:  Brian K Trevelline; Jahree Sosa; Barry K Hartup; Kevin D Kohl
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Diet-induced microbiome shifts of sympatric overwintering birds.

Authors:  Chao Li; Yan Liu; Minghao Gong; Changming Zheng; Chenglin Zhang; Huixin Li; Wanyu Wen; Yuhang Wang; Gang Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Covariation of the Fecal Microbiome with Diet in Nonpasserine Birds.

Authors:  Kangpeng Xiao; Yutan Fan; Zhipeng Zhang; Xuejuan Shen; Xiaobing Li; Xianghui Liang; Ran Bi; Yajiang Wu; Junqiong Zhai; Junwei Dai; David M Irwin; Wu Chen; Yongyi Shen
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.389

6.  Significant Differences in the Gut Bacterial Communities of Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) in Different Seasons at a Stopover Site on the Flyway.

Authors:  Fengling Zhang; Xingjia Xiang; Yuanqiu Dong; Shaofei Yan; Yunwei Song; Lizhi Zhou
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Effects of urbanization on the foraging ecology and microbiota of the generalist seabird Larus argentatus.

Authors:  Matthew Fuirst; Richard R Veit; Megan Hahn; Nolwenn Dheilly; Lesley H Thorne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Meta-transcriptomics reveals a diverse antibiotic resistance gene pool in avian microbiomes.

Authors:  Vanessa R Marcelino; Michelle Wille; Aeron C Hurt; Daniel González-Acuña; Marcel Klaassen; Timothy E Schlub; John-Sebastian Eden; Mang Shi; Jonathan R Iredell; Tania C Sorrell; Edward C Holmes
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Sustained RNA virome diversity in Antarctic penguins and their ticks.

Authors:  Michelle Wille; Erin Harvey; Mang Shi; Daniel Gonzalez-Acuña; Edward C Holmes; Aeron C Hurt
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  The Cloacal Microbiome of Five Wild Duck Species Varies by Species and Influenza A Virus Infection Status.

Authors:  Sarah M Hird; Holly Ganz; Jonathan A Eisen; Walter M Boyce
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.