BACKGROUND: Dietary intake is known to be a driver of microbial community dynamics in ruminants. Beef cattle go through a finishing phase that typically includes very high concentrate ratios in their feed, with consequent effects on rumen metabolism including methane production. This longitudinal study was designed to measure dynamics of the rumen microbial community in response to the introduction of high concentrate diets fed to beef cattle during the finishing period. A cohort of 50 beef steers were fed either of two basal diet formulations consisting of approximately 10:90 or 50:50 forage:concentrate ratios respectively. Nitrate and oil rich supplements were also added either individually or in combination. Digesta samples were taken at time points over ~ 200 days during the finishing period of the cattle to measure the adaptation to the basal diet and long-term stability of the rumen microbiota. RESULTS: 16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries were prepared from 313 rumen digesta samples and analysed at a depth of 20,000 sequences per library. Bray Curtis dissimilarity with analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed highly significant (p < 0.001) differences in microbiota composition between cattle fed different basal diets, largely driven by reduction of fibre degrading microbial groups and increased relative abundance of an unclassified Gammaproteobacteria OTU in the high concentrate fed animals. Conversely, the forage-based diet was significantly associated with methanogenic archaea. Within basal diet groups, addition of the nitrate and combined supplements had lesser, although still significant, impacts on microbiota dissimilarity compared to pre-treatment time points and controls. Measurements of the response and stability of the microbial community over the time course of the experiment showed continuing adaptation up to 25 days in the high concentrate groups. After this time point, however, no significant variability was detected. CONCLUSIONS: High concentrate diets that are typically fed to finishing beef cattle can have a significant effect on the microbial community in the rumen. Inferred metabolic activity of the different microbial communities associated with each of the respective basal diets explained differences in methane and short chain fatty acid production between cattle. Longitudinal sampling revealed that once adapted to a change in diet, the rumen microbial community remains in a relatively stable alternate state.
BACKGROUND: Dietary intake is known to be a driver of microbial community dynamics in ruminants. Beef cattle go through a finishing phase that typically includes very high concentrate ratios in their feed, with consequent effects on rumen metabolism including methane production. This longitudinal study was designed to measure dynamics of the rumen microbial community in response to the introduction of high concentrate diets fed to beef cattle during the finishing period. A cohort of 50 beef steers were fed either of two basal diet formulations consisting of approximately 10:90 or 50:50 forage:concentrate ratios respectively. Nitrate and oil rich supplements were also added either individually or in combination. Digesta samples were taken at time points over ~ 200 days during the finishing period of the cattle to measure the adaptation to the basal diet and long-term stability of the rumen microbiota. RESULTS: 16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries were prepared from 313 rumen digesta samples and analysed at a depth of 20,000 sequences per library. Bray Curtis dissimilarity with analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed highly significant (p < 0.001) differences in microbiota composition between cattle fed different basal diets, largely driven by reduction of fibre degrading microbial groups and increased relative abundance of an unclassified Gammaproteobacteria OTU in the high concentrate fed animals. Conversely, the forage-based diet was significantly associated with methanogenic archaea. Within basal diet groups, addition of the nitrate and combined supplements had lesser, although still significant, impacts on microbiota dissimilarity compared to pre-treatment time points and controls. Measurements of the response and stability of the microbial community over the time course of the experiment showed continuing adaptation up to 25 days in the high concentrate groups. After this time point, however, no significant variability was detected. CONCLUSIONS: High concentrate diets that are typically fed to finishing beef cattle can have a significant effect on the microbial community in the rumen. Inferred metabolic activity of the different microbial communities associated with each of the respective basal diets explained differences in methane and short chain fatty acid production between cattle. Longitudinal sampling revealed that once adapted to a change in diet, the rumen microbial community remains in a relatively stable alternate state.
Authors: Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott; Thomas Ryabin; Justine R Hall; Martin Hartmann; Emily B Hollister; Ryan A Lesniewski; Brian B Oakley; Donovan H Parks; Courtney J Robinson; Jason W Sahl; Blaz Stres; Gerhard G Thallinger; David J Van Horn; Carolyn F Weber Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Morten Poulsen; Clarissa Schwab; Bent Borg Jensen; Ricarda M Engberg; Anja Spang; Nuria Canibe; Ole Højberg; Gabriel Milinovich; Lena Fragner; Christa Schleper; Wolfram Weckwerth; Peter Lund; Andreas Schramm; Tim Urich Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Luke R Thompson; Jon G Sanders; Daniel McDonald; Amnon Amir; Joshua Ladau; Kenneth J Locey; Robert J Prill; Anupriya Tripathi; Sean M Gibbons; Gail Ackermann; Jose A Navas-Molina; Stefan Janssen; Evguenia Kopylova; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Antonio González; James T Morton; Siavash Mirarab; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Lingjing Jiang; Mohamed F Haroon; Jad Kanbar; Qiyun Zhu; Se Jin Song; Tomasz Kosciolek; Nicholas A Bokulich; Joshua Lefler; Colin J Brislawn; Gregory Humphrey; Sarah M Owens; Jarrad Hampton-Marcell; Donna Berg-Lyons; Valerie McKenzie; Noah Fierer; Jed A Fuhrman; Aaron Clauset; Rick L Stevens; Ashley Shade; Katherine S Pollard; Kelly D Goodwin; Janet K Jansson; Jack A Gilbert; Rob Knight Journal: Nature Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: R John Wallace; John A Rooke; Nest McKain; Carol-Anne Duthie; Jimmy J Hyslop; David W Ross; Anthony Waterhouse; Mick Watson; Rainer Roehe Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Julio E Vargas; Sonia Andrés; Timothy J Snelling; Lorena López-Ferreras; David R Yáñez-Ruíz; Carlos García-Estrada; Secundino López Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Sokratis Stergiadis; Irene Cabeza-Luna; Marina Mora-Ortiz; Robert D Stewart; Richard J Dewhurst; David J Humphries; Mick Watson; Rainer Roehe; Marc D Auffret Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Larisa A Ilina; Valentina A Filippova; Evgeni A Brazhnik; Andrey V Dubrovin; Elena A Yildirim; Timur P Dunyashev; Georgiy Y Laptev; Natalia I Novikova; Dmitriy V Sobolev; Aleksandr A Yuzhakov; Kasim A Laishev Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 2.752
Authors: Ricardo M Stockler; Haley Hallowell; Keah V Higgins; Erin S Groover; Elizabeth M Hiltbold; Benjamin Newcomer; Paul H Walz Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-02-24
Authors: Marina Martínez-Álvaro; Marc D Auffret; Carol-Anne Duthie; Richard J Dewhurst; Matthew A Cleveland; Mick Watson; Rainer Roehe Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2022-04-12