William J Kelly1, Sinead C Leahy2, Janine Kamke3, Priya Soni2, Satoshi Koike4, Roderick Mackie5, Rekha Seshadri6, Gregory M Cook7, Sergio E Morales7, Chris Greening8, Graeme T Attwood9. 1. Donvis Ltd, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 2. AgResearch Ltd, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 3. Horizons Regional Council, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 4. Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. 5. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA. 6. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. 8. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 9. AgResearch Ltd, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand. graeme.attwood@agresearch.co.nz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Digestive processes in the rumen lead to the release of methyl-compounds, mainly methanol and methylamines, which are used by methyltrophic methanogens to form methane, an important agricultural greenhouse gas. Methylamines are produced from plant phosphatidylcholine degradation, by choline trimethylamine lyase, while methanol comes from demethoxylation of dietary pectins via pectin methylesterase activity. We have screened rumen metagenomic and metatranscriptomic datasets, metagenome assembled genomes, and the Hungate1000 genomes to identify organisms capable of producing methyl-compounds. We also describe the enrichment of pectin-degrading and methane-forming microbes from sheep rumen contents and the analysis of their genomes via metagenomic assembly. RESULTS: Screens of metagenomic data using the protein domains of choline trimethylamine lyase (CutC), and activator protein (CutD) found good matches only to Olsenella umbonata and to Caecibacter, while the Hungate1000 genomes and metagenome assembled genomes from the cattle rumen found bacteria within the phyla Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The cutC and cutD genes clustered with genes that encode structural components of bacterial microcompartment proteins. Prevotella was the dominant genus encoding pectin methyl esterases, with smaller numbers of sequences identified from other fibre-degrading rumen bacteria. Some large pectin methyl esterases (> 2100 aa) were found to be encoded in Butyrivibrio genomes. The pectin-utilising, methane-producing consortium was composed of (i) a putative pectin-degrading bacterium (phylum Tenericutes, class Mollicutes), (ii) a galacturonate-using Sphaerochaeta sp. predicted to produce acetate, lactate, and ethanol, and (iii) a methylotrophic methanogen, Methanosphaera sp., with the ability to form methane via a primary ethanol-dependent, hydrogen-independent, methanogenesis pathway. CONCLUSIONS: The main bacteria that produce methyl-compounds have been identified in ruminants. Their enzymatic activities can now be targeted with the aim of finding ways to reduce the supply of methyl-compound substrates to methanogens, and thereby limit methylotrophic methanogenesis in the rumen.
BACKGROUND: Digestive processes in the rumen lead to the release of methyl-compounds, mainly methanol and methylamines, which are used by methyltrophic methanogens to form methane, an important agricultural greenhouse gas. Methylamines are produced from plant phosphatidylcholine degradation, by cholinetrimethylamine lyase, while methanol comes from demethoxylation of dietary pectins via pectin methylesterase activity. We have screened rumen metagenomic and metatranscriptomic datasets, metagenome assembled genomes, and the Hungate1000 genomes to identify organisms capable of producing methyl-compounds. We also describe the enrichment of pectin-degrading and methane-forming microbes from sheep rumen contents and the analysis of their genomes via metagenomic assembly. RESULTS: Screens of metagenomic data using the protein domains of cholinetrimethylamine lyase (CutC), and activator protein (CutD) found good matches only to Olsenella umbonata and to Caecibacter, while the Hungate1000 genomes and metagenome assembled genomes from the cattle rumen found bacteria within the phyla Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The cutC and cutD genes clustered with genes that encode structural components of bacterial microcompartment proteins. Prevotella was the dominant genus encoding pectin methyl esterases, with smaller numbers of sequences identified from other fibre-degrading rumen bacteria. Some large pectin methyl esterases (> 2100 aa) were found to be encoded in Butyrivibrio genomes. The pectin-utilising, methane-producing consortium was composed of (i) a putative pectin-degrading bacterium (phylum Tenericutes, class Mollicutes), (ii) a galacturonate-using Sphaerochaeta sp. predicted to produce acetate, lactate, and ethanol, and (iii) a methylotrophic methanogen, Methanosphaera sp., with the ability to form methane via a primary ethanol-dependent, hydrogen-independent, methanogenesis pathway. CONCLUSIONS: The main bacteria that produce methyl-compounds have been identified in ruminants. Their enzymatic activities can now be targeted with the aim of finding ways to reduce the supply of methyl-compound substrates to methanogens, and thereby limit methylotrophic methanogenesis in the rumen.
Authors: Kelly C Wrighton; Brian C Thomas; Itai Sharon; Christopher S Miller; Cindy J Castelle; Nathan C VerBerkmoes; Michael J Wilkins; Robert L Hettich; Mary S Lipton; Kenneth H Williams; Philip E Long; Jillian F Banfield Journal: Science Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eva Wollenberg; Meryl Richards; Pete Smith; Petr Havlík; Michael Obersteiner; Francesco N Tubiello; Martin Herold; Pierre Gerber; Sarah Carter; Andrew Reisinger; Detlef P van Vuuren; Amy Dickie; Henry Neufeldt; Björn O Sander; Reiner Wassmann; Rolf Sommer; James E Amonette; Alessandra Falcucci; Mario Herrero; Carolyn Opio; Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta; Elke Stehfest; Henk Westhoek; Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio; Tek Sapkota; Mariana C Rufino; Philip K Thornton; Louis Verchot; Paul C West; Jean-François Soussana; Tobias Baedeker; Marc Sadler; Sonja Vermeulen; Bruce M Campbell Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 10.863
Authors: Mirjam A Kabel; Carl J Yeoman; Yejun Han; Dylan Dodd; Charles A Abbas; Jan A M de Bont; Mark Morrison; Isaac K O Cann; Roderick I Mackie Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Sinead C Leahy; William J Kelly; Eric Altermann; Ron S Ronimus; Carl J Yeoman; Diana M Pacheco; Dong Li; Zhanhao Kong; Sharla McTavish; Carrie Sang; Suzanne C Lambie; Peter H Janssen; Debjit Dey; Graeme T Attwood Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana Martínez-del Campo; Smaranda Bodea; Hilary A Hamer; Jonathan A Marks; Henry J Haiser; Peter J Turnbaugh; Emily P Balskus Journal: MBio Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Susanne Künzel; Timur Yergaliyev; Katharina J Wild; Hanna Philippi; Asta H Petursdottir; Helga Gunnlaugsdottir; Chris K Reynolds; David J Humphries; Amélia Camarinha-Silva; Markus Rodehutscord Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 6.064
Authors: William J Kelly; Roderick I Mackie; Graeme T Attwood; Peter H Janssen; Tim A McAllister; Sinead C Leahy Journal: Anim Microbiome Date: 2022-03-14
Authors: R Bica; J Palarea-Albaladejo; J Lima; D Uhrin; G A Miller; J M Bowen; D Pacheco; A Macrae; R J Dewhurst Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 4.379