Breanna Michell Roque1, Charles Garrett Brooke1, Joshua Ladau2, Tamsen Polley1, Lyndsey Jean Marsh1, Negeen Najafi1, Pramod Pandey3, Latika Singh3, Robert Kinley4, Joan King Salwen5, Emiley Eloe-Fadrosh2, Ermias Kebreab1, Matthias Hess6. 1. Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. 2. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA. 3. Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. 4. Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Building 145 James Cook Drive, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. 5. Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. 6. Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. mhess@ucdavis.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies using batch-fermentation suggest that the red macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis has the potential to reduce methane (CH4) production from beef cattle by up to ~ 99% when added to Rhodes grass hay; a common feed in the Australian beef industry. These experiments have shown significant reductions in CH4 without compromising other fermentation parameters (i.e. volatile fatty acid production) with A. taxiformis organic matter (OM) inclusion rates of up to 5%. In the study presented here, A. taxiformis was evaluated for its ability to reduce methane production from dairy cattle fed a mixed ration widely utilized in California, the largest milk producing state in the US. RESULTS: Fermentation in a semi-continuous in-vitro rumen system suggests that A. taxiformis can reduce methane production from enteric fermentation in dairy cattle by 95% when added at a 5% OM inclusion rate without any obvious negative impacts on volatile fatty acid production. High-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing showed that seaweed amendment effects rumen microbiome consistent with the Anna Karenina hypothesis, with increased β-diversity, over time scales of approximately 3 days. The relative abundance of methanogens in the fermentation vessels amended with A. taxiformis decreased significantly compared to control vessels, but this reduction in methanogen abundance was only significant when averaged over the course of the experiment. Alternatively, significant reductions of CH4 in the A. taxiformis amended vessels was measured in the early stages of the experiment. This suggests that A. taxiformis has an immediate effect on the metabolic functionality of rumen methanogens whereas its impact on microbiome assemblage, specifically methanogen abundance, is delayed. CONCLUSIONS: The methane reducing effect of A. taxiformis during rumen fermentation makes this macroalgae a promising candidate as a biotic methane mitigation strategy for dairy cattle. But its effect in-vivo (i.e. in dairy cattle) remains to be investigated in animal trials. Furthermore, to obtain a holistic understanding of the biochemistry responsible for the significant reduction of methane, gene expression profiles of the rumen microbiome and the host animal are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies using batch-fermentation suggest that the red macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis has the potential to reduce methane (CH4) production from beef cattle by up to ~ 99% when added to Rhodes grass hay; a common feed in the Australian beef industry. These experiments have shown significant reductions in CH4 without compromising other fermentation parameters (i.e. volatile fatty acid production) with A. taxiformis organic matter (OM) inclusion rates of up to 5%. In the study presented here, A. taxiformis was evaluated for its ability to reduce methane production from dairy cattle fed a mixed ration widely utilized in California, the largest milk producing state in the US. RESULTS: Fermentation in a semi-continuous in-vitro rumen system suggests that A. taxiformis can reduce methane production from enteric fermentation in dairy cattle by 95% when added at a 5% OM inclusion rate without any obvious negative impacts on volatile fatty acid production. High-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing showed that seaweed amendment effects rumen microbiome consistent with the Anna Karenina hypothesis, with increased β-diversity, over time scales of approximately 3 days. The relative abundance of methanogens in the fermentation vessels amended with A. taxiformis decreased significantly compared to control vessels, but this reduction in methanogen abundance was only significant when averaged over the course of the experiment. Alternatively, significant reductions of CH4 in the A. taxiformis amended vessels was measured in the early stages of the experiment. This suggests that A. taxiformis has an immediate effect on the metabolic functionality of rumen methanogens whereas its impact on microbiome assemblage, specifically methanogen abundance, is delayed. CONCLUSIONS: The methane reducing effect of A. taxiformis during rumen fermentation makes this macroalgae a promising candidate as a biotic methane mitigation strategy for dairy cattle. But its effect in-vivo (i.e. in dairy cattle) remains to be investigated in animal trials. Furthermore, to obtain a holistic understanding of the biochemistry responsible for the significant reduction of methane, gene expression profiles of the rumen microbiome and the host animal are warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
16S rRNA community profiling; Asparagopsis taxiformis; Feed supplementation; Greenhouse gas mitigation; In-vitro rumen fermentation; Macroalgae; Rumen microbiome
Authors: Giulia Corona; Yang Ji; Prapaporn Anegboonlap; Sarah Hotchkiss; Chris Gill; Parveen Yaqoob; Jeremy P E Spencer; Ian Rowland Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Dawn E Holmes; Ludovic Giloteaux; Roberto Orellana; Kenneth H Williams; Mark J Robbins; Derek R Lovley Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Christian Quast; Elmar Pruesse; Pelin Yilmaz; Jan Gerken; Timmy Schweer; Pablo Yarza; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: William Walters; Embriette R Hyde; Donna Berg-Lyons; Gail Ackermann; Greg Humphrey; Alma Parada; Jack A Gilbert; Janet K Jansson; J Gregory Caporaso; Jed A Fuhrman; Amy Apprill; Rob Knight Journal: mSystems Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 6.496
Authors: Susanne Künzel; Timur Yergaliyev; Katharina J Wild; Hanna Philippi; Asta H Petursdottir; Helga Gunnlaugsdottir; Chris K Reynolds; David J Humphries; Amélia Camarinha-Silva; Markus Rodehutscord Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 6.064
Authors: Chaopeng Hong; Jennifer A Burney; Julia Pongratz; Julia E M S Nabel; Nathaniel D Mueller; Robert B Jackson; Steven J Davis Journal: Nature Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Breanna M Roque; Marielena Venegas; Robert D Kinley; Rocky de Nys; Toni L Duarte; Xiang Yang; Ermias Kebreab Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Youyoung Choi; Shin Ja Lee; Hyun Sang Kim; Jun Sik Eom; Seong Uk Jo; Le Luo Guan; Jakyeom Seo; Hanbeen Kim; Sang Suk Lee; Sung Sill Lee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Matthew Tom Harrison; Brendan Richard Cullen; Dianne Elizabeth Mayberry; Annette Louise Cowie; Franco Bilotto; Warwick Brabazon Badgery; Ke Liu; Thomas Davison; Karen Michelle Christie; Albert Muleke; Richard John Eckard Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2021-08-29 Impact factor: 13.211
Authors: Ole G Mouritsen; Prannie Rhatigan; M Lynn Cornish; Alan T Critchley; José Lucas Pérez-Lloréns Journal: J Appl Phycol Date: 2020-11-07 Impact factor: 3.215