Silvina Ramos1, Mariana Romero2, Carla Perrotta3, Yanina Sguassero4, Cecilia Straw5, Celina Gialdini4, Natalia Righetti6, Ana P Betran7. 1. CEDES: Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina. silvinaramosarcoiris@gmail.com. 2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CONICET/CEDES: Centro de Estudios de Estado Y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. School of Public Health, University College Dublin, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. 4. CREP: Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina. 5. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires/CEDES: Centro de Estudios de Estado Y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6. CEDES: Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 7. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While cesarean section is an essential life-saving strategy for women and newborns, its current overuse constitutes a global problem. The aim of this formative research is to collect information from hospitals, health professionals and women regarding the use of cesarean section in Argentina. This article describes the methodology of the study, the characteristics of the hospitals and the profile of the participants. METHODS: This formative research is a mixed-method study that will be conducted in seven provinces of Argentina. The eligibility criteria for the hospitals are (a) use of the Perinatal Information System, (b) cesarean section rate higher than 27% in 2016, (c) ≥ 1000 deliveries per year. Quantitative and qualitative research techniques will be used for data collection and analysis. The main inquiry points are the determining factors for the use of cesarean section, the potential interventions to optimize the use of cesarean section and, in the case of women, their preferred type of delivery. DISCUSSION: It is expected that the findings will provide a situation diagnosis to help a context-sensitive implementation of the interventions recommended by the World Health Organization to optimize cesarean section use. Trial registration IS002316 Cesarean section is an essential medical tool for mothers and their children, but nowadays its overuse is a problem worldwide. Our purpose is to get information from hospitals, health professionals and women about how cesarean section is used in Argentina. In this protocol we describe how we will carry out the study and the characteristics of the hospitals and participants. We will implement this study in seven provinces of Argentina, in hospitals that have more than 1,000 births each year, had a cesarean section rate higher than 27% in 2016 and use the Perinatal Information System. We will gather information using forms, surveys and interviews. We want to identify the factors that decide the use of a cesarean section, the potential interventions that can improve the use of cesarean section and, in the case of women, the type of delivery they prefer. We expect that this study will give us a diagnosis of how cesarean section is used in Argentina, and that this will help to apply the interventions that the World Health Organization recommends to optimize the use of cesarean section in our specific context.
BACKGROUND: While cesarean section is an essential life-saving strategy for women and newborns, its current overuse constitutes a global problem. The aim of this formative research is to collect information from hospitals, health professionals and women regarding the use of cesarean section in Argentina. This article describes the methodology of the study, the characteristics of the hospitals and the profile of the participants. METHODS: This formative research is a mixed-method study that will be conducted in seven provinces of Argentina. The eligibility criteria for the hospitals are (a) use of the Perinatal Information System, (b) cesarean section rate higher than 27% in 2016, (c) ≥ 1000 deliveries per year. Quantitative and qualitative research techniques will be used for data collection and analysis. The main inquiry points are the determining factors for the use of cesarean section, the potential interventions to optimize the use of cesarean section and, in the case of women, their preferred type of delivery. DISCUSSION: It is expected that the findings will provide a situation diagnosis to help a context-sensitive implementation of the interventions recommended by the World Health Organization to optimize cesarean section use. Trial registration IS002316 Cesarean section is an essential medical tool for mothers and their children, but nowadays its overuse is a problem worldwide. Our purpose is to get information from hospitals, health professionals and women about how cesarean section is used in Argentina. In this protocol we describe how we will carry out the study and the characteristics of the hospitals and participants. We will implement this study in seven provinces of Argentina, in hospitals that have more than 1,000 births each year, had a cesarean section rate higher than 27% in 2016 and use the Perinatal Information System. We will gather information using forms, surveys and interviews. We want to identify the factors that decide the use of a cesarean section, the potential interventions that can improve the use of cesarean section and, in the case of women, the type of delivery they prefer. We expect that this study will give us a diagnosis of how cesarean section is used in Argentina, and that this will help to apply the interventions that the World Health Organization recommends to optimize the use of cesarean section in our specific context.
Entities:
Keywords:
Argentina; Cesarean section; Public hospitals; Qualitative research
Authors: Joel Gittelsohn; Allan Steckler; Carolyn C Johnson; Charlotte Pratt; Mira Grieser; Julie Pickrel; Elaine J Stone; Terry Conway; Derek Coombs; Lisa K Staten Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2006-02
Authors: D L Higgins; K O'Reilly; N Tashima; C Crain; C Beeker; G Goldbaum; C S Elifson; C Galavotti; C Guenther-Grey Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 1996 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Ties Boerma; Carine Ronsmans; Dessalegn Y Melesse; Aluisio J D Barros; Fernando C Barros; Liang Juan; Ann-Beth Moller; Lale Say; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor; Mu Yi; Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto; Marleen Temmerman Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-10-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ana Pilar Betrán; Jianfeng Ye; Anne-Beth Moller; Jun Zhang; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240