| Literature DB >> 33499420 |
Sonja Kahlmeier1,2, Esther Anaya Boig3, Castro Fernandez A2, Emilia Smeds4, Fabrizio Benvenuti5, Ulf Eriksson6, Francesco Iacorossi5, Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen7, Luc Int Panis8,9, David Rojas-Rueda10,11, Sandra Wegener12, Audrey de Nazelle3.
Abstract
The importance of setting a policy focus on promoting cycling and walking as sustainable and healthy modes of transport is increasingly recognized. However, to date a science-driven scoring system to assess the policy environment for cycling and walking is lacking. In this study, spreadsheet-based scoring systems for cycling and walking were developed, including six dimensions (cycling/walking culture, social acceptance, perception of traffic safety, advocacy, politics and urban planning). Feasibility was tested using qualitative data from pre-specified sections of semi-standardized interview and workshop reports from a European research project in seven cities, assessed independently by two experts. Disagreements were resolved by discussions of no more than 75 minutes per city. On the dimension "perception of traffic safety", quantitative panel data were used. While the interrater agreement was fair, feasibility was confirmed in general. Validity testing against social norms towards active travel, modal split and network length was encouraging for the policy area of cycling. Rating the policy friendliness for cycling and walking separately was found to be appropriate, as different cities received the highest scores for each. Replicating this approach in a more standardized way would pave the way towards a transparent, evidence-based system for benchmarking policy approaches of cities towards cycling and walking.Entities:
Keywords: active travel policy assessment; cycling; scoring; transport planning; walking
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33499420 PMCID: PMC7908172 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390