Literature DB >> 33499069

Subsequent Ultrasound Vascular Targeting Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Improves the Treatment Efficacy.

Laith R Sultan1, Mrigendra B Karmacharya1, Stephen J Hunt2, Andrew K W Wood3, Chandra M Sehgal1.   

Abstract

The response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to anti-vascular ultrasound therapy (AVUS) can be affected by the inherent differences in tumor vascular structure, and the functionality of tumor vessels at the time of treatment. In this study, we evaluate the hypothesis that repeated subsequent AVUS therapies are a possible approach to overcome these factors and improve the therapeutic efficacy of AVUS. HCC was induced in 30 Wistar rats by oral ingestion of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) for 12 weeks. A total of 24 rats received treatment with low intensity, 2.8 MHz ultrasound with an intravenous injection of microbubbles. Treated rats were divided into three groups: single therapy group (ST), 2-days subsequent therapy group (2DST), and 7-days subsequent therapy group (7DST). A sham control group did not receive ultrasound therapy. Tumor perfusion was measured by quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) nonlinear and power-Doppler imaging. Tumors were harvested for histologic evaluation of ultrasound-induced vascular changes. ANOVA was used to compare the percent change of perfusion parameters between the four treatment arms. HCC tumors treated with 2DST showed the largest reduction in tumor perfusion, with 75.3% reduction on average for all perfusion parameters. The ST group showed an average decrease in perfusion of 54.3%. The difference between the two groups was significant p < 0.001. The 7DST group showed a reduction in tumor perfusion of 45.3%, which was significant compared to the 2DST group (p < 0.001) but not different from the ST group (p = 0.2). The use of subsequent targeted AVUS therapies applied shortly (two days) after the first treatment enhanced the anti-vascular effect of ultrasound. This gain, however, was lost for a longer interval (1 week) between the therapies, possibly due to tumor necrosis and loss of tumor viability. These findings suggest that complex interplay between neovascularization and tumor viability plays a critical role in treatment and, therefore, must be actively monitored following treatment by CEUS for optimizing sequential treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer therapy; contrast enhanced ultrasound; hepatocellular carcinoma; targeted therapy; theranostics; tumor vasculature

Year:  2021        PMID: 33499069      PMCID: PMC7911459          DOI: 10.3390/biology10020079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biology (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-7737


  26 in total

1.  Nonlinear contrast imaging with an array-based micro-ultrasound system.

Authors:  A Needles; M Arditi; N G Rognin; J Mehi; T Coulthard; C Bilan-Tracey; E Gaud; P Frinking; D Hirson; F S Foster
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Locoregional Therapy, Immunotherapy and the Combination in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Future Directions.

Authors:  Meaghan S Dendy; Johannes M Ludwig; Stacey M Stein; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 11.740

3.  Combination of repeated single-session percutaneous ethanol injection and transarterial chemoembolisation compared to repeated single-session percutaneous ethanol injection in patients with non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Arne Dettmer; Timm-D Kirchhoff; Michael Gebel; Lars Zender; Nisar-P Malek; Bernhard Panning; Ajay Chavan; Herbert Rosenthal; Stefan Kubicka; Susanne Krusche; Sonja Merkesdal; Michael Galanski; Michael-P Manns; Joerg-S Bleck
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The disruption of murine tumor neovasculature by low-intensity ultrasound-comparison between 1- and 3-MHz sonication frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Ralph M Bunte; Heather E Price; Margaret S Deitz; Jeff H Tsai; William M-F Lee; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Vascular targeting agents as cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Philip E Thorpe
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  B-mode ultrasound for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a quantitative multiparametric analysis for a radiomics approach.

Authors:  Julia C D'Souza; Laith R Sultan; Stephen J Hunt; Susan M Schultz; Angela K Brice; Andrew K W Wood; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for the antivascular treatment and monitoring of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Julia C D'Souza; Laith R Sultan; Stephen J Hunt; Terence P Gade; Mrigendra B Karmacharya; Susan M Schultz; Angela K Brice; Andrew K W Wood; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2019-10-01
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound and Nanomedicine for Cancer-Targeted Drug Delivery: Screening, Cellular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Chien-Hsiu Li; Yu-Chan Chang; Michael Hsiao; Ming-Hsien Chan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.525

2.  Hydralazine augmented ultrasound hyperthermia for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Mrigendra B Karmacharya; Laith R Sultan; Stephen J Hunt; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.