Literature DB >> 33498944

Simulated Patient Role-Plays with Consumers with Lived Experience of Mental Illness Post-Mental Health First Aid Training: Interrater and Test Re-Test Reliability of an Observed Behavioral Assessment Rubric.

Sarira El-Den1, Rebekah J Moles1, Randi Zhang1, Claire L O'Reilly1.   

Abstract

Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training teaches participants how to assist people experiencing mental health problems and crises. Observed behavioral assessments, post-training, are lacking, and the literature largely focuses on self-reported measurement of behaviors and confidence. This study explores the reliability of an observed behavioral assessment rubric used to assess pharmacy students during simulated patient (SP) role-play assessments with mental health consumers. Post-MHFA training, pharmacy students (n = 528) participated in SP role-play assessments (n = 96) of six mental health cases enacted by consumers with lived experience of mental illness. Each assessment was marked by the tutor, participating student, and consumer (three raters). Non-parametric tests were used to compare raters' means scores and pass/fail categories. Interrater reliability analyses were conducted for overall scores, as well as pass/fail categories using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss' Kappa, respectively. Test re-test reliability analyses were conducted using Pearson's correlation. For interrater reliability analyses, the intra-class correlation coefficient varied from poor-to-good to moderate-to-excellent for individual cases but was moderate-to-excellent for combined cases (0.70; CI 0.58-0.80). Fleiss' Kappa varied across cases but was fair-to-good for combined cases (0.57, p < 0.001). For test re-test reliability analyses, Pearson's correlation was strong for individual and combined cases (0.87; p < 0.001). Recommended modifications to the rubric, including the addition of barrier items, scoring guides, and specific examples, as well as the creation of new case-specific rubric versions, may improve reliability. The rubric can be used to facilitate the measurement of actual, observed behaviors post-MHFA training in pharmacy and other health care curricula.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; mental health education; observed behavioral measurement; reliability; simulated patient

Year:  2021        PMID: 33498944      PMCID: PMC7838905          DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy9010028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)        ISSN: 2226-4787


  24 in total

1.  Development and implementation of a scoring rubric for aseptic technique.

Authors:  Michael C Brown; Jeannine Conway; Todd D Sorensen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Clinical judgment development: using simulation to create an assessment rubric.

Authors:  Kathie Lasater
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.726

3.  The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.

Authors:  G E Miller
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Comparing knowledge and self-reported hand hygiene practices with direct observation among Iranian hospital nurses.

Authors:  Seyed Sadeq Seyed Nematian; Charles John Palenik; Seyed Kousha Mirmasoudi; Nahid Hatam; Mehrdad Askarian
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

6.  Exploring Health Care Professionals' Knowledge of, Attitudes Towards, and Confidence in Caring for People at Risk of Suicide: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evelyn Boukouvalas; Sarira El-Den; Andrea L Murphy; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Claire L O'Reilly
Journal:  Arch Suicide Res       Date:  2019-04-22

Review 7.  Global Burden of Disease and the Impact of Mental and Addictive Disorders.

Authors:  Jürgen Rehm; Kevin D Shield
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Measurement of the reliability of pharmacy staff and simulated patient reports of non-prescription medicine requests in community pharmacies.

Authors:  Jack C Collins; Ming Yeung Chan; Carl R Schneider; Lam R Yan; Rebekah J Moles
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2020-09-11

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mental Health First Aid training: Effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour.

Authors:  Amy J Morgan; Anna Ross; Nicola J Reavley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stéphanie A Prince; Kristi B Adamo; Meghan E Hamel; Jill Hardt; Sarah Connor Gorber; Mark Tremblay
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mental Health First Aid: A Systematic Review of Trainee Behavior and Recipient Mental Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah Forthal; Karolina Sadowska; Kathleen M Pike; Manya Balachander; Kristina Jacobsson; Sabrina Hermosilla
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.084

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.