Literature DB >> 33498854

Prognostic Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer Survival in a Randomized Screening Trial: Development and Validation.

Subas Neupane1, Jaakko Nevalainen1, Jani Raitanen1,2, Kirsi Talala3, Paula Kujala4, Kimmo Taari5, Teuvo L J Tammela6, Ewout W Steyerberg7,8, Anssi Auvinen1.   

Abstract

We developed and validated a prognostic index to predict survival from prostate cancer (PCa) based on the Finnish randomized screening trial (FinRSPC). Men diagnosed with localized PCa (N = 7042) were included. European Association of Urology risk groups were defined. The follow-up was divided into three periods (0-3, 3-9 and 9-20 years) for development and two corresponding validation periods (3-6 and 9-15 years). A multivariable complementary log-log regression model was used to calculate the full prognostic index. Predicted cause-specific survival at 10 years from diagnosis was calculated for the control arm using a simplified risk score at diagnosis. The full prognostic index discriminates well men with PCa with different survival. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.83 for both the 3-6 year and 9-15 year validation periods. In the simplified risk score, patients with a low risk score at diagnosis had the most favorable survival, while the outcome was poorest for the patients with high risk scores. The prognostic index was able to distinguish well between men with higher and lower survival, and the simplified risk score can be used as a basis for decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mortality; prediction model; prognostic index; prostate cancer; screening trial

Year:  2021        PMID: 33498854      PMCID: PMC7865328          DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  21 in total

1.  Prospective validation of an algorithm with systematic sextant biopsy to predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan Conrad; Markus Graefen; Uwe Pichlmeier; Rolf-Peter Henke; Andreas Erbersdobler; Peter G Hammerer; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prognostic factors of prostate cancer mortality in a Finnish randomized screening trial.

Authors:  Subas Neupane; Ewout Steyerberg; Jani Raitanen; Kirsi Talala; Juho Pylväläinen; Kimmo Taari; Teuvo Lj Tammela; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Fernando J Bianco; Zohar A Dotan; Paul A Fearn; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Mark S Litwin; David M Latini; Janeen Du Chane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-29

7.  Effect of age, tumor risk, and comorbidity on competing risks for survival in a U.S. population-based cohort of men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Daskivich; Kang-Hsien Fan; Tatsuki Koyama; Peter C Albertsen; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Richard M Hoffman; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; Mark S Litwin; David F Penson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Estimation of the optimal utilisation rates of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer by a review of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Stephen R Thompson; Geoff P Delaney; Susannah Jacob; Jesmin Shafiq; Karen Wong; Timothy P Hanna; Gabriel S Gabriel; Michael B Barton
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Survival analysis Part III: multivariate data analysis -- choosing a model and assessing its adequacy and fit.

Authors:  M J Bradburn; T G Clark; S B Love; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Urological Cancer Panorama in the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Estibaliz López-Fernández; Javier C Angulo; José I López; Claudia Manini
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.