Literature DB >> 33498772

Toward a Better Testing Paradigm for Developmental Neurotoxicity: OECD Efforts and Regulatory Considerations.

Magdalini Sachana1, Timothy J Shafer2, Andrea Terron3.   

Abstract

Characterization of potential chemical-induced developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) hazard is considered for risk assessment purposes by many regulatory sectors. However, due to test complexity, difficulty in interpreting results and need of substantial resources, the use of the in vivo DNT test guidelines has been limited and animal data on DNT are scarce. To address challenging endpoints such as DNT, the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) chemical safety program has been working lately toward the development of integrated approaches for testing and assessment (IATA) that rely on a combination of multiple layers of data (e.g., in vitro, in silico and non-mammalian in vivo models) that are supported by mechanistic knowledge organized according to the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework. In 2017, the OECD convened a dedicated OECD expert group to develop a guidance document on the application and interpretation of data derived from a DNT testing battery that relies on key neurodevelopmental processes and is complemented by zebrafish assays. This review will provide a brief overview of the OECD DNT project and summarize various achievements of relevance to the project. The review also presents an opportunity to describe considerations for uptake of the DNT in an in vitro battery in a regulatory context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse outcome pathways; developmental neurotoxicity; in vitro battery; integrated approaches to testing and assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33498772      PMCID: PMC7912397          DOI: 10.3390/biology10020086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biology (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-7737


  39 in total

Review 1.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Use of high content image analysis to detect chemical-induced changes in synaptogenesis in vitro.

Authors:  Joshua A Harrill; Brian L Robinette; William R Mundy
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  OECD/EFSA workshop on developmental neurotoxicity (DNT): The use of non-animal test methods for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Ellen Fritsche; Kevin M Crofton; Antonio F Hernandez; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Marcel Leist; Anna Bal-Price; Elissa Reaves; Martin F Wilks; Andrea Terron; Roland Solecki; Magdalini Sachana; Anne Gourmelon
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 4.  Expanding the test set: Chemicals with potential to disrupt mammalian brain development.

Authors:  William R Mundy; Stephanie Padilla; Joseph M Breier; Kevin M Crofton; Mary E Gilbert; David W Herr; Karl F Jensen; Nicholas M Radio; Kathleen C Raffaele; Kelly Schumacher; Timothy J Shafer; John Cowden
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.763

5.  Comparative human and rat "neurosphere assay" for developmental neurotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Jenny Baumann; Marta Barenys; Kathrin Gassmann; Ellen Fritsche
Journal:  Curr Protoc Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-20

Review 6.  Developmental neurotoxicity test guidelines: problems and perspectives.

Authors:  Chiharu Tohyama
Journal:  J Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.196

7.  Evaluation of a human neurite growth assay as specific screen for developmental neurotoxicants.

Authors:  Anne K Krug; Nina V Balmer; Florian Matt; Felix Schönenberger; Dorit Merhof; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  Developmental neurotoxicity guideline study: issues with methodology, evaluation and regulation.

Authors:  Ryozo Tsuji; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Congenit Anom (Kyoto)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.409

Review 9.  A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426.

Authors:  Susan L Makris; Kathleen Raffaele; Sandra Allen; Wayne J Bowers; Ulla Hass; Enrico Alleva; Gemma Calamandrei; Larry Sheets; Patric Amcoff; Nathalie Delrue; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Workgroup report: incorporating in vitro alternative methods for developmental neurotoxicity into international hazard and risk assessment strategies.

Authors:  Sandra Coecke; Alan M Goldberg; Sandra Allen; Leonora Buzanska; Gemma Calamandrei; Kevin Crofton; Lars Hareng; Thomas Hartung; Holger Knaut; Paul Honegger; Miriam Jacobs; Pamela Lein; Abby Li; William Mundy; David Owen; Steffen Schneider; Ellen Silbergeld; Torsten Reum; Tomas Trnovec; Florianne Monnet-Tschudi; Anna Bal-Price
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  Motor dysfunction in Drosophila melanogaster as a biomarker for developmental neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Ana Cabrita; Alexandra M Medeiros; Telmo Pereira; António Sebastião Rodrigues; Michel Kranendonk; César S Mendes
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  Integrating Data From In Vitro New Approach Methodologies for Developmental Neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Kelly E Carstens; Amy F Carpenter; Melissa M Martin; Joshua A Harrill; Timothy J Shafer; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.109

Review 3.  Looking at Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing from the Perspective of an Invertebrate Embryo.

Authors:  Gerd Bicker
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Roadbumps at the Crossroads of Integrating Behavioral and In Vitro Approaches for Neurotoxicity Assessment.

Authors:  G Jean Harry; Sandra McBride; Shannah K Witchey; Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja; Alain Trembleau; Matthew Bridge; Anna Bencsik
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Scientific Validation of Human Neurosphere Assays for Developmental Neurotoxicity Evaluation.

Authors:  Katharina Koch; Kristina Bartmann; Julia Hartmann; Julia Kapr; Jördis Klose; Eliška Kuchovská; Melanie Pahl; Kevin Schlüppmann; Etta Zühr; Ellen Fritsche
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-02

6.  Neuronal differentiation pathways and compound-induced developmental neurotoxicity in the human neural progenitor cell test (hNPT) revealed by RNA-seq.

Authors:  Victoria C de Leeuw; Conny T M van Oostrom; Paul F K Wackers; Jeroen L A Pennings; Hennie M Hodemaekers; Aldert H Piersma; Ellen V S Hessel
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 8.943

Review 7.  Neurotoxicity of Engineered Nanomaterials: Testing Considerations.

Authors:  Eleonora Scarcello; Adriana Sofranko; Tina Wahle; Roel P F Schins
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-13

8.  Brain Damage and Repair: From Molecular Effects to Central Nervous System Disorders.

Authors:  Olivier Armant; Christelle Adam-Guillermin
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.