Literature DB >> 26476195

Expanding the test set: Chemicals with potential to disrupt mammalian brain development.

William R Mundy1, Stephanie Padilla2, Joseph M Breier2, Kevin M Crofton3, Mary E Gilbert2, David W Herr2, Karl F Jensen2, Nicholas M Radio2, Kathleen C Raffaele4, Kelly Schumacher5, Timothy J Shafer2, John Cowden3.   

Abstract

High-throughput test methods including molecular, cellular, and alternative species-based assays that examine critical events of normal brain development are being developed for detection of developmental neurotoxicants. As new assays are developed, a "training set" of chemicals is used to evaluate the relevance of individual assays for specific endpoints. Different training sets are necessary for each assay that would comprise a developmental neurotoxicity test battery. In contrast, evaluation of the predictive ability of a comprehensive test battery requires a set of chemicals that have been shown to alter brain development after in vivo exposure ("test set"). Because only a small number of substances have been well documented to alter human neurodevelopment, we have proposed an expanded test set that includes chemicals demonstrated to adversely affect neurodevelopment in animals. To compile a list of potential developmental neurotoxicants, a literature review of compounds that have been examined for effects on the developing nervous system was conducted. The search was limited to mammalian studies published in the peer-reviewed literature and regulatory studies submitted to the U.S. EPA. The definition of developmental neurotoxicity encompassed changes in behavior, brain morphology, and neurochemistry after gestational or lactational exposure. Reports that indicated developmental neurotoxicity was observed only at doses that resulted in significant maternal toxicity or were lethal to the fetus or offspring were not considered. As a basic indication of reproducibility, we only included a chemical if data on its developmental neurotoxicity were available from more than one laboratory (defined as studies originating from laboratories with a different senior investigator). Evidence from human studies was included when available. Approximately 100 developmental neurotoxicity test set chemicals were identified, with 22% having evidence in humans. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; Development; Neurotoxicity; Reference chemicals; Toxicity testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476195     DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2015.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol        ISSN: 0892-0362            Impact factor:   3.763


  25 in total

1.  A locust embryo as predictive developmental neurotoxicity testing system for pioneer axon pathway formation.

Authors:  Karsten Bode; Maja Bohn; Jennifer Reitmeier; Philine Betker; Michael Stern; Gerd Bicker
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integrates in silico approaches.

Authors:  Kevin M Crofton; Arianna Bassan; Mamta Behl; Yaroslav G Chushak; Ellen Fritsche; Jeffery M Gearhart; Mary Sue Marty; Moiz Mumtaz; Manuela Pavan; Patricia Ruiz; Magdalini Sachana; Rajamani Selvam; Timothy J Shafer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Steven T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Dan Wilson; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-17

3.  Oral Exposure to Lead Acetate for 28 Days Reduces the Number of Neural Progenitor Cells but Increases the Number and Synaptic Plasticity of Newborn Granule Cells in Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis of Young-Adult Rats.

Authors:  Natsuno Maeda; Saori Shimizu; Yasunori Takahashi; Reiji Kubota; Suzuka Uomoto; Keisuke Takesue; Kazumi Takashima; Hiromu Okano; Ryota Ojiro; Shunsuke Ozawa; Qian Tang; Meilan Jin; Yoshiaki Ikarashi; Toshinori Yoshida; Makoto Shibutani
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Potential frameworks to support evaluation of mechanistic data for developmental neurotoxicity outcomes: A symposium report.

Authors:  Laura M Carlson; Frances A Champagne; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Laura Dishaw; Elaine Faustman; William Mundy; Deborah Segal; Christina Sobin; Carol Starkey; Michele Taylor; Susan L Makris; Andrew Kraft
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 5.  Animal models of endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Suzanne E Fenton; David Aylor
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.690

6.  Sources of clinically significant neonatal intensive care unit phthalate exposure.

Authors:  Annemarie Stroustrup; Jennifer B Bragg; Stefanie A Busgang; Syam S Andra; Paul Curtin; Emily A Spear; Allan C Just; Manish Arora; Chris Gennings
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Teratological and Behavioral Screening of the National Toxicology Program 91-Compound Library in Zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Katharina Dach; Bianca Yaghoobi; Martin R Schmuck; Dennis R Carty; Kelly M Morales; Pamela J Lein
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  High-Throughput Screening of Compound Neurotoxicity Using 3D-Cultured Neural Stem Cells on a 384-Pillar Plate.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Kang; Pranav Joshi; Moo-Yeal Lee
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2021-04

Review 9.  Toward a Better Testing Paradigm for Developmental Neurotoxicity: OECD Efforts and Regulatory Considerations.

Authors:  Magdalini Sachana; Timothy J Shafer; Andrea Terron
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-23

10.  Evaluation of chemical compounds that inhibit neurite outgrowth using GFP-labeled iPSC-derived human neurons.

Authors:  Shuaizhang Li; Li Zhang; Ruili Huang; Tuan Xu; Fred Parham; Mamta Behl; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.