| Literature DB >> 33498286 |
Sailendra Naidu1, Sadeer Alzubaidi1, Grace Knuttinen1, Indravadan Patel1, Andrew Fleck1, John Sweeney2, Bashar Aqel3, Brandon Larsen4, Matthew Buras5, Michael Golafshar5, Rahmi Oklu1.
Abstract
Hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplant is often treated with endovascular stent placement. Our institution has adopted use of drug-eluting stents, particularly in small-caliber arteries. We aimed to compare patency rates of drug-eluting stents vs. traditional bare-metal stents. This was a single-institution, retrospective study of liver transplant hepatic artery stenosis treated with stents. Primary patency was defined as time from stent placement to resistive index on Doppler ultrasonography (<0.5), hepatic artery thrombosis, or any intervention including surgery. Fifty-two patients were treated with stents (31 men; mean age, 57 years): 15, drug-eluting stents; 37, bare-metal stents. Mean arterial diameters were 4.1 mm and 5.1 mm, respectively. Technical success was 100% (52/52). At 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years, primary patency for drug-eluting stents was 80%, 71%, 71%, and 71%; bare-metal stents: 76%, 65%, 53%, and 46% (p = 0.41). Primary patency for small-caliber arteries (3.5-4.5 mm) with drug-eluting stents was 93%, 75%, 75%, and 75%; bare-metal stents: 60%, 60%, 50%, and 38% (p = 0.19). Overall survival was 100%, 100%, 94%, and 91%. Graft survival was 100%, 98%, 96%, and 90%. Stenting for hepatic artery stenosis was safe and effective. While not statistically significant, patency improved with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents, especially in arteries < 4.5 mm in diameter. Drug-eluting stents can be considered for liver transplant hepatic artery stenosis, particularly in small-caliber arteries.Entities:
Keywords: arterial occlusive diseases/therapy; hepatic artery/physiopathology; liver transplantation/adverse effects; stents; vascular patency
Year: 2021 PMID: 33498286 PMCID: PMC7863956 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241