Literature DB >> 15585732

Sirolimus-eluting vs uncoated stents for prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries: a randomized trial.

Diego Ardissino1, Claudio Cavallini, Ezio Bramucci, Ciro Indolfi, Antonio Marzocchi, Antonio Manari, Giulia Angeloni, Giuseppe Carosio, Erminio Bonizzoni, Stefania Colusso, Monica Repetto, Piera Angelica Merlini.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Percutaneous coronary revascularization of small vessels is associated with a high restenosis rate. Sirolimus-eluting stents reduce restenosis in simple and previously untreated lesions of large coronary arteries, but their outcomes in small vessels have not been adequately investigated.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sirolimus-eluting stents are associated with a reduced 8-month rate of angiographic restenosis in comparison with an uncoated stent. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: This was a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, prospective trial performed with 257 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization for ischemic heart disease, and who had a previously untreated atherosclerotic lesion located in a small segment with a diameter of 2.75 mm or less, in 20 Italian centers between August 2002 and December 2003. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive a sirolimus-eluting stent (129 patients) or an uncoated stent having an identical architecture and radiographic appearance (128 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the 8-month binary in-segment restenosis rate; secondary end points included procedural success and the 8-month rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) reference diameter of the treated segment was 2.2 (0.28) mm; the lesion length, 11.84 (6.15) mm. After 8 months, the binary in-segment restenosis rate was 53.1% (60/113) in the patients receiving an uncoated stent and 9.8% (12/123) in those receiving a sirolimus-eluting stent (relative risk [RR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.32; P<.001). Fewer patients randomized to sirolimus-eluting stents experienced major adverse cardiac events (12/129 [9.3%] vs 40/128 [31.3%]; RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15-0.55; P<.001) mainly because of a reduction in target lesion revascularization (9/129 [7%] vs 27/128 [21.1%]; RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.70; P = .002) and myocardial infarction (2/129 [1.6%] vs 10/129 [7.8%]; RR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.01-0.93; P = .04).
CONCLUSION: The use of sirolimus-eluting stents to treat atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries reduces restenosis and may also reduce major adverse cardiac events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15585732     DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.22.2727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  38 in total

1.  Health economic evaluation of the use of drug-eluting stents : First results from the Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.de).

Authors:  S N Willich; F Müller-Riemenschneider; D McBride; S Silber; K-H Kuck; C A Nienaber; S Schneider; J Senges; B Brüggenjürgen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Stents or surgery: the case for stents.

Authors:  James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

3.  Utility of drug-eluting stents in complex lesions and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Eugenia Nikolsky; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-02

Review 4.  A meta-analysis of trials comparing Cypher and Taxus stents in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Sidhu; N Shafiq; S Malhotra; P Pandhi; A Grover
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Long-term outcomes of patients receiving drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Andrew C Philpott; Danielle A Southern; Fiona M Clement; P Diane Galbraith; Mouhieddin Traboulsi; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  One-year clinical outcomes of BioMatrix™-Biolimus A9™ eluting stent: the e-BioMatrix multicenter post marketing surveillance registry in India.

Authors:  Ashwin B Mehta; Praveen Chandra; Jamshed Dalal; Prabhakar Shetty; Devang Desai; K Chocklingam; Jayesh Prajapati; Pramod Kumar; Vilas Magarkar; Apurva Vasawada; B K Goyal; Viveka Kumar; V Suryaprakash Rao; Ramesh Babu; Pritesh Parikh; Upendra Kaul; Aruna Patil; Tushar Mhetre; Hrishikesh Rangnekar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-09-23

7.  Clinical outcomes with Biolimus (A9)™ eluting stent, 'BioMatrix' in diabetic patients--interim results from multicenter post market surveillance registry in India.

Authors:  Ashok Seth; Shirish Hiremath; Sameer Dani; Sunil Kapoor; R K Jain; Rajpal Abhaichand; Shailendra Trivedi; Upendra Kaul; Aruna Patil; Bhushan Khemnar; Hrishikesh Rangnekar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-09-21

8.  Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter.

Authors:  Martin Unverdorben; Franz X Kleber; Hubertus Heuer; Hans-Reiner Figulla; Christian Vallbracht; Matthias Leschke; Bodo Cremers; Stefan Hardt; Michael Buerke; Hanns Ackermann; Michael Boxberger; Ralf Degenhardt; Bruno Scheller
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Are "treatment" bare metal stents superior to "control" bare metal stents? A meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  David M Kent; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 10.  The risk of drug-eluting stent thrombosis with noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Emmanouil S Brilakis; Subhash Banerjee; Peter B Berger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.