Literature DB >> 33497422

Validation of the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0-3D accuracy assessment tool for bimaxillary surgery and genioplasty.

Frank Baan1,2, Juliana F Sabelis3, Ruud Schreurs3, Gert van de Steeg2, Tong Xi2, Tom C T van Riet3, Alfred G Becking3,4, Thomas J J Maal1,2.   

Abstract

Orthognathic surgery is a widely performed procedure to correct dentofacial deformities. Virtual treatment planning is an important preparation step. One advantage of the use of virtual treatment planning is the possibility to assess the accuracy of orthognathic surgery. In this study, a tool (OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0), which allows for quantification of the accuracy of orthognathic surgery, is presented and validated. In the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0 the accuracy of the osseous chin can now be assessed which was not possible in the earlier version of the OrthoGnathicAnalyser. 30 patients who underwent bimaxillary surgery in combination with a genioplasty were selected from three different centers in the Netherlands. A pre-operative (CB)CT scan, virtual treatment planning and postoperative (CB)CT scan were required for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery. The preoperative and postoperative (CB)CT scans were aligned using voxel-based matching. Furthermore, voxel-based matching was used to align the pre-operative maxilla, mandible and rami towards their postoperative position whereas surface-based matching was used for aligning the pre-operative chin towards the postoperative position. The alignment resulted in a transformation matrix which contained the achieved translations and rotations. The achieved translations and rotations can be compared to planning values of the virtual treatment plan. To study the reproducibility, two independent observers processed all 30 patients to assess the inter-observer variability. One observer processed the patients twice to assess the intra-observer variability. Both the intra- and inter-observer variability showed high ICC values (> 0.92) and low measurement variations (< 0.673±0.684mm and < 0.654±0.824°). The results of this study show that the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0 has an excellent reproducibility for quantification of skeletal movements between two (CB)CT scans.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33497422      PMCID: PMC7837467          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  21 in total

1.  The precision of computer-generated surgical splints.

Authors:  Jaime Gateno; James Xia; John F Teichgraeber; Andrew Rosen; Bruce Hultgren; Tim Vadnais
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks--a three-dimensional computed tomography study.

Authors:  Irem Titiz; Michala Laubinger; Thomas Keller; Klaus Hertrich; Ursula Hirschfelder
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Accuracy of computer-assisted orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Giacomo De Riu; Paola Ilaria Virdis; Silvio Mario Meloni; Aurea Lumbau; Luigi Angelo Vaira
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Automated human skull landmarking with 2D Gabor wavelets.

Authors:  Markus A de Jong; Atilla Gül; Jan Pieter de Gijt; Maarten J Koudstaal; Manfred Kayser; Eppo B Wolvius; Stefan Böhringer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Evaluation of the Accuracy of Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Morphometric Study.

Authors:  Emanuele Zavattero; Michele Romano; Giovanni Gerbino; Diego Sergio Rossi; Aldo Bruno Giannì; Guglielmo Ramieri; Alessandro Baj
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Sam Sheng-Pin Hsu; Jaime Gateno; R Bryan Bell; David L Hirsch; Michael R Markiewicz; John F Teichgraeber; Xiaobo Zhou; James J Xia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 7.  Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms.

Authors:  Hwi-Dong Jung; Sang Yoon Kim; Hyung-Sik Park; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-28

8.  A New 3D Tool for Assessing the Accuracy of Bimaxillary Surgery: The OrthoGnathicAnalyser.

Authors:  Frank Baan; Jeroen Liebregts; Tong Xi; Ruud Schreurs; Martien de Koning; Stefaan Bergé; Thomas Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  One-year postoperative skeletal stability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery.

Authors:  Jeroen Liebregts; Frank Baan; Pieter van Lierop; Martien de Koning; Stefaan Bergé; Thomas Maal; Tong Xi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison of the accuracy of voxel based registration and surface based registration for 3D assessment of surgical change following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Anas Almukhtar; Xiangyang Ju; Balvinder Khambay; James McDonald; Ashraf Ayoub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  A semi-automatic approach for longitudinal 3D upper airway analysis using voxel-based registration.

Authors:  Alexandru Diaconu; Michael Boelstoft Holte; Paolo Maria Cattaneo; Else Marie Pinholt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Stamm; Eugenia Andriyuk; Johannes Kleinheinz; Susanne Jung; Dieter Dirksen; Claudius Middelberg
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-21

Review 3.  Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations.

Authors:  Fernando de Oliveira Andriola; Orion Luiz Haas Junior; Raquel Guijarro-Martínez; Federico Hernández-Alfaro; Rogério Belle de Oliveira; Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli; Gwen Rj Swennen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Intraoral Scanning as an Alternative to Evaluate the Accuracy of Dental Implant Placements in Partially Edentate Situations: A Prospective Clinical Case Series.

Authors:  Jan van Hooft; Guido Kielenstijn; Jeroen Liebregts; Frank Baan; Gert Meijer; Jan D'haese; Ewald Bronkhorst; Luc Verhamme
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.