Literature DB >> 21566086

Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks--a three-dimensional computed tomography study.

Irem Titiz1, Michala Laubinger, Thomas Keller, Klaus Hertrich, Ursula Hirschfelder.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the repeatability and reproducibility of the placement of anthropological cephalometric landmarks on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) cranial reconstructions derived from volume data sets. In addition, the influence of the observer's experience on the repeatability of landmark setting was also explored. Twenty patients without any craniofacial deformity (11 females and 9 males; age range 6.1-16 years) were selected retrospectively from CT volume data sets already available from 695 patients of Dental Clinic 3, Orthodontics of Erlangen University Hospital. The CT examination was performed with the SOMATOM Sensation64 (Siemens AG Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). The program VoXim6.1 (IVS Solutions AG, Chemnitz, Germany) was used for 3D reconstruction of the volume data sets. A total of 28 landmarks were examined in the skeleton module of the program VoXim6.1. The randomly sorted data sets were analysed by two orthodontists and two postgraduate students. Each data set was analysed twice by each observer at an interval of 3 weeks. The analysis of variance regarding random effects was used to calculate the intraobserver and interobserver components of standard deviation (SD) of depiction of individual landmarks as measures of repeatability and reproducibility, respectively. Median intraserial SD and interserial SD of 0.46 mm (range: 0.14-2.00 mm) and 0.20 mm (range: 0.02-2.47 mm), respectively, were obtained depending on the landmark and plane. This study included systematic analysis of extreme values (outliers) in the assessment of the quality of measurements obtained. Descriptive statistics revealed qualitative differences in the depiction of different landmarks. The landmarks nasion and infradentale revealed a minor SD in all three spatial coordinates with the smallest SD for infradentale (SD = 0.18 mm) in the transverse plane. However, no systematic trend was identified with regard to the influence of the observer's level of experience affecting the repeatability of landmark positioning. Thus, the repeatability and reproducibility of placements of landmarks with 3D CT were found to be acceptable for a majority of anatomical positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21566086     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  Three-dimensional CT evaluation of oculoauriculovertebral spectrum patients use of Katsumata's asymmetry index.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hofmann; Matthias Schmid; Stefanie Steinhäuser-Andresen; Ursula Hirschfelder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Landmarks of the Frankfort horizontal plane : Reliability in a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hofmann; Rolf Fimmers; Matthias Schmid; Ursula Hirschfelder; Andreas Detterbeck; Klaus Hertrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.

Authors:  Marina Codari; Matteo Caffini; Gianluca M Tartaglia; Chiarella Sforza; Giuseppe Baselli
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  An eFace-Template Method for Efficiently Generating Patient-Specific Anatomically-Detailed Facial Soft Tissue FE Models for Craniomaxillofacial Surgery Simulation.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Zhen Tang; Michael A K Liebschner; Daeseung Kim; Shunyao Shen; Chien-Ming Chang; Peng Yuan; Guangming Zhang; Jaime Gateno; Xiaobo Zhou; Shao-Xiang Zhang; James J Xia
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Denise K Liberton; Payal Verma; Anthony Contratto; Janice S Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  A semi-automatic approach for longitudinal 3D upper airway analysis using voxel-based registration.

Authors:  Alexandru Diaconu; Michael Boelstoft Holte; Paolo Maria Cattaneo; Else Marie Pinholt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Comparison of surface- and voxel-based registration on the mandibular ramus for long-term three-dimensional assessment of condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Michael Boelstoft Holte; Henrik Sæderup; Else Marie Pinholt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  A New 3D Tool for Assessing the Accuracy of Bimaxillary Surgery: The OrthoGnathicAnalyser.

Authors:  Frank Baan; Jeroen Liebregts; Tong Xi; Ruud Schreurs; Martien de Koning; Stefaan Bergé; Thomas Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Validation of the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0-3D accuracy assessment tool for bimaxillary surgery and genioplasty.

Authors:  Frank Baan; Juliana F Sabelis; Ruud Schreurs; Gert van de Steeg; Tong Xi; Tom C T van Riet; Alfred G Becking; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Soft tissue coverage on the segmentation accuracy of the 3D surface-rendered model from cone-beam CT.

Authors:  J K Dusseldorp; H C Stamatakis; Y Ren
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.