| Literature DB >> 33496998 |
Florian Grimm1, Jasmin Rehman1, Stefan Stoldt2, Taukeer A Khan2, Jan Gero Schlötel3, Shamil Nizamov1, Michael John4, Vladimir N Belov2, Stefan W Hell2.
Abstract
Formylation of 2,6-dichloro-5-R-nicotinic acids at C-4 followed by condensation withEntities:
Keywords: dyes/pigments; fluorescence; fluorescent probes; scanning probe microscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33496998 PMCID: PMC8048976 DOI: 10.1002/chem.202005134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.236
Scheme 1Membrane‐permeant fluorophores in equilibrium between non‐fluorescent and fluorescent forms. For structures of 565pR, linkers and ligands, see Scheme 2 and Figure 3.
Scheme 2Synthesis of chloropyridine‐containing rhodamine dyes 5‐R as analogs of 4‐TAMRA (with the uniform numeration of the carbon atoms). Reagents and conditions: i) LDA, THF, −78 °C, 1 h; then DMF, −78 °C to RT, 1 h; ii) 1,2‐dichlorbenzene, 120 °C, 3 h; iii) HSCO2H, Et3N, DMF, RT, 1 h.
Figure 3Chemical structures of fluorescent probes based on dye 5‐H (5‐F for actin) connected via amide bounds and linkers with ligands (recognition units) for tubulin (cabazitaxel), lysomes (pepstatin A), mitochondria [(4‐carboxybutyl)triphenylphosphonium] and HaloTag fusion protein (HaloTag amine O2). The values of the fluorescence quantum yields (in aq. PBS) are given. Blue: structure of 610CP‐6′‐COOH (carbopyronine) dye incorporated into tubulin probe (see Figure S6) and used in two‐color STED imaging.
Photophysical properties of dyes measured in aqueous PBS at pH 7.5
|
Dye |
Absorption
( |
Emission
( |
|
Lifetime[d] [ns] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
564 (90 000) |
589 (0.31) |
24 |
2.2 |
|
|
double: 529/ 573 (57 000) |
597 (0.29) |
15 |
2.0 |
|
|
551 (78 000) |
573 (0.41) |
14 |
2.0 |
|
|
609 (100 000) |
634 (0.59) |
36 |
3.1 |
[a] ϵ—extinction coefficient. [b] Φ fl—fluorescence quantum yield (absolute value). [c] Dielectrical constant of dioxane (D=2)—water (D=80) mixture, in which the fluorescent form (Scheme 1) is present to 50 % of its maximal possible concentration (in pure water). [d] Lifetime of the excited state. [e] Scheme 2; data from ref. [11b]. [f] Figure 3; data from ref. [6c].
Figure 1a) Normalized absorption (solid line) and emission (dashed line) spectra of pyridine‐containing rhodamine 5‐H (565pR) in PBS at pH 7.5. Green bar shows excitation at 561 nm and red bar represent 775 nm STED laser. b) Normalized absorption (A/Amax) at λ max of 5‐H (565pR) plotted vs. dielectric constant (D) of dioxane‐water mixtures. D 0.5 values (Table 1) correspond to the intersection of interpolated graphs with A/Amax=0.5 line.
Figure 2Confocal and STED microscopy (indirect immunofluorescence) of a nuclear pore complex (NPC) protein NUP98 in fixed Vero cell labeled with dye 5‐H (565pR): a) STED and confocal (upper left corner) images of NPC with a confocal overview of the whole nucleus (upper right corner), scale bar 1 μm; b) example of an line profile of one NPC under confocal (black line) and STED (red line) conditions; the Gaussian fits gave full‐width‐at‐half‐maximum (FWHM) of 220 nm for confocal and 86 nm for STED image; c) distribution of FWHM values (N=309) under STED conditions. Confocal and STED images were acquired using a pulsed 561 nm excitation laser (average power at focal plane: 2.8 μW, 40 MHz). For STED images a pulsed 775 nm STED laser (average power at focal plane: 60 mW, 40 MHz; pulse length: 1.1 ns).
Figure 4Imaging of cellular structures and organelles in living cells stained with 565pR probes (for structures, see Figure 3): a) confocal image of mitochondria network in a living human fibroblast labeled with 565pR‐Mito with a close‐up (white frame; scale bar 2 μm) of a selected region; scale bar: 10 μm; b) STED and confocal (upper left corner) microscopy images of tubulin network in a living U2OS cell stained with 565pR‐Tubu; scale bar: 2 μm; c) two‐color image of lysosomes (confocal) stained with 565pR‐Lyso (green) and tubulin network (STED) stained with 610CP‐Tubu in a living human fibroblast; scale bar: 2 μm; d) two‐color STED and confocal (upper left corner) images of a monoclonal vimentin‐Halo expressing U2OS cell; vimentin and tubulin were stained with a 565pR‐Halo (green) and 610CP‐Tubu (magenta) probes, respectively; scale bar 2 μm. Confocal and STED images were recorded with Facility Line (a–c) or Expert Line microscopes (d) equipped with a pulsed 561 nm (for 565pR‐probes) and 640 nm (for 610CP‐Tubu) excitation lasers, respectively, and a pulsed 775 nm STED laser (repetition rate: 40 MHz; pulse duration: 1.1 ns). The color separation in c was enabled by rainbow detection.
Figure 5Multicolor confocal volume‐image (z‐projection, 45 frames) of sperm bundles inside Drosophila melanogaster adult testis (ex vivo). a) DNA stained with Hoechst (“grey”), b) tubulin stained with 565pR‐Tubu (“green”), c) actin cones stained with SiR‐Actin (“magenta”). d) Merge of three channels shown in a–c. Images were recorded with excitation lasers 405 nm, 561 nm and 640 nm (for Hoechst, 565pR and SiR dyes, respectively) on a Facility Line microscope (Abberior Instruments GmbH) equipped with rainbow detection module. Scale bar 10 μm.
Figure 6Confocal and STED images of Drosophila melanogaster wild type egg chamber (ex vivo). a) Three color image of DNA (cyan) stained with Hoechst, tubulin (green) stained with 565pR‐Tubu and actin (magenta) stained with 610CP‐Actin probes. b) confocal image of a chosen area in a). c) STED image of a chosen area in a). Images were recorded with a facility line (Abberior Instruments GmbH) equipped with excitation lasers 405 nm, 561 nm and 640 nm (for Hoechst, 565pR and 610CP dyes, respectively), a pulsed 775 nm STED laser (repetition rate: 40 MHz; pulse duration: 1.1 ns) and rainbow detection. Scale bar 10 μm (in a) and 2 μm (in b and c).