Christie A Befort1, Jeffrey J VanWormer2, Cyrus Desouza3, Edward F Ellerbeck1, Byron Gajewski4, Kim S Kimminau5, K Allen Greiner5, Michael G Perri6, Alexandra R Brown4, Ram D Pathak7, Terry T-K Huang8, Leslie Eiland3, Andjela Drincic3. 1. Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City. 2. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin. 3. Division of Endocrinology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City. 5. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City. 6. College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville. 7. Department of Endocrinology, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin. 8. School of Public Health and Health Policy, Center for Systems and Community Design, City University of New York, New York, New York.
Abstract
Importance: Rural populations have a higher prevalence of obesity and poor access to weight loss programs. Effective models for treating obesity in rural clinical practice are needed. Objective: To compare the Medicare Intensive Behavioral Therapy for Obesity fee-for-service model with 2 alternatives: in-clinic group visits based on a patient-centered medical home model and telephone-based group visits based on a disease management model. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized trial conducted in 36 primary care practices in the rural Midwestern US. Inclusion criteria included age 20 to 75 years and body mass index of 30 to 45. Participants were enrolled from February 2016 to October 2017. Final follow-up occurred in December 2019. Interventions: All participants received a lifestyle intervention focused on diet, physical activity, and behavior change strategies. In the fee-for-service intervention (n = 473), practice-employed clinicians provided 15-minute in-clinic individual visits at a frequency similar to that reimbursed by Medicare (weekly for 1 month, biweekly for 5 months, and monthly thereafter). In the in-clinic group intervention (n = 468), practice-employed clinicians delivered group visits that were weekly for 3 months, biweekly for 3 months, and monthly thereafter. In the telephone group intervention (n = 466), patients received the same intervention as the in-clinic group intervention, but sessions were delivered remotely via conference calls by centralized staff. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was weight change at 24 months. A minimum clinically important difference was defined as 2.75 kg. Results: Among 1407 participants (mean age, 54.7 [SD, 11.8] years; baseline body mass index, 36.7 [SD, 4.0]; 1081 [77%] women), 1220 (87%) completed the trial. Mean weight loss at 24 months was -4.4 kg (95% CI, -5.5 to -3.4 kg) in the in-clinic group intervention, -3.9 kg (95% CI, -5.0 to -2.9 kg) in the telephone group intervention, and -2.6 kg (95% CI, -3.6 to -1.5 kg) in the in-clinic individual intervention. Compared with the in-clinic individual intervention, the mean difference in weight change was -1.9 kg (97.5% CI, -3.5 to -0.2 kg; P = .01) for the in-clinic group intervention and -1.4 kg (97.5% CI, -3.0 to 0.3 kg; P = .06) for the telephone group intervention. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with obesity in rural primary care clinics, in-clinic group visits but not telephone-based group visits, compared with in-clinic individual visits, resulted in statistically significantly greater weight loss at 24 months. However, the differences were small in magnitude and of uncertain clinical importance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02456636.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Rural populations have a higher prevalence of obesity and poor access to weight loss programs. Effective models for treating obesity in rural clinical practice are needed. Objective: To compare the Medicare Intensive Behavioral Therapy for Obesity fee-for-service model with 2 alternatives: in-clinic group visits based on a patient-centered medical home model and telephone-based group visits based on a disease management model. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized trial conducted in 36 primary care practices in the rural Midwestern US. Inclusion criteria included age 20 to 75 years and body mass index of 30 to 45. Participants were enrolled from February 2016 to October 2017. Final follow-up occurred in December 2019. Interventions: All participants received a lifestyle intervention focused on diet, physical activity, and behavior change strategies. In the fee-for-service intervention (n = 473), practice-employed clinicians provided 15-minute in-clinic individual visits at a frequency similar to that reimbursed by Medicare (weekly for 1 month, biweekly for 5 months, and monthly thereafter). In the in-clinic group intervention (n = 468), practice-employed clinicians delivered group visits that were weekly for 3 months, biweekly for 3 months, and monthly thereafter. In the telephone group intervention (n = 466), patients received the same intervention as the in-clinic group intervention, but sessions were delivered remotely via conference calls by centralized staff. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was weight change at 24 months. A minimum clinically important difference was defined as 2.75 kg. Results: Among 1407 participants (mean age, 54.7 [SD, 11.8] years; baseline body mass index, 36.7 [SD, 4.0]; 1081 [77%] women), 1220 (87%) completed the trial. Mean weight loss at 24 months was -4.4 kg (95% CI, -5.5 to -3.4 kg) in the in-clinic group intervention, -3.9 kg (95% CI, -5.0 to -2.9 kg) in the telephone group intervention, and -2.6 kg (95% CI, -3.6 to -1.5 kg) in the in-clinic individual intervention. Compared with the in-clinic individual intervention, the mean difference in weight change was -1.9 kg (97.5% CI, -3.5 to -0.2 kg; P = .01) for the in-clinic group intervention and -1.4 kg (97.5% CI, -3.0 to 0.3 kg; P = .06) for the telephone group intervention. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with obesity in rural primary care clinics, in-clinic group visits but not telephone-based group visits, compared with in-clinic individual visits, resulted in statistically significantly greater weight loss at 24 months. However, the differences were small in magnitude and of uncertain clinical importance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02456636.
Authors: Sherry L Pagoto; Kristin L Schneider; Jessica L Oleski; Juliana M Luciani; Jamie S Bodenlos; Matt C Whited Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Christie A Befort; Jennifer R Klemp; Debra K Sullivan; Theresa Shireman; Francisco J Diaz; Kathryn Schmitz; Michael G Perri; Carol Fabian Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Rebecca H Neiberg; Rena R Wing; Jeanne M Clark; Linda M Delahanty; James O Hill; Jonathan Krakoff; Amy Otto; Donna H Ryan; Mara Z Vitolins Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Anthony N Fabricatore; Thomas A Wadden; Reneé H Moore; Meghan L Butryn; Steven B Heymsfield; Allison Martin Nguyen Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2009-05-20
Authors: Joseph E Donnelly; Jeannine Goetz; Cheryl Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; Robert Lee; Bryan K Smith; Kate Lambourne; Matthew S Mayo; Suzanne Hunt; Jae Hoon Lee; Jeffrey J Honas; Richard A Washburn Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Gary G Bennett; Dori Steinberg; Sandy Askew; Erica Levine; Perry Foley; Bryan C Batch; Laura P Svetkey; Hayden B Bosworth; Elaine M Puleo; Ashley Brewer; Abigail DeVries; Heather Miranda Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jane N Bolin; Gail R Bellamy; Alva O Ferdinand; Ann M Vuong; Bita A Kash; Avery Schulze; Janet W Helduser Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Kathryn M Ross; Chelsea A Carpenter; Kelsey M Arroyo; Meena N Shankar; Fan Yi; Peihua Qiu; Lisa Anthony; Jaime Ruiz; Michael G Perri Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; John W Apolzan; Byron Gajewski; William D Johnson; Corby K Martin; Robert L Newton; Michael G Perri; Jeffrey J VanWormer; Christie A Befort Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 9.298
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; Emily F Mire; Corby K Martin; Robert L Newton; John W Apolzan; Eboni G Price-Haywood; Kara D Denstel; Ronald Horswell; San T Chu; William D Johnson Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 5.551
Authors: Perla Saldivar; Valerie Mira; Petra Duran; Christina Moldovan; Georgina Ang; Nina Parikh; Martin L Lee; Theodore C Friedman Journal: Obes Sci Pract Date: 2021-05-04
Authors: Tamar S Polonsky; Amit Khera; Michael D Miedema; Douglas D Schocken; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 6.106