Virginia Paul-Ebhohimhen1, Alison Avenell. 1. Health Services Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, UK. v.a.paul-ebhohimhen@abdn.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both group and individual modes of delivery are employed for obesity treatments. Commercial weight loss groups commonly employ group-based delivery, while many clinical based settings employ one-to-one delivery. We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of treatments for adult obesity to compare the effectiveness of group-based to individual-based modes of treatment delivery. METHODS: We searched 7 electronic databases and 2 journals and reviewed secondary references, based on a priori criteria to systematically review: randomised controlled trials of obesity treatments, participants with BMI >or=28 kg/m(2), age >or=18 years, comparison groups including at least 1 group-based and 1 individual-based treatment group, and follow-up >or=1 year. We extracted data and conducted meta-analysis of weight change. RESULTS: Eleven comparison groups from 5 qualifying trials were obtained, representing a total participant pool of 336. Significantly greater (p = 0.03) weight change at 12 months was found in group-based over individualbased treatment, and sub-analyses showed that increased effectiveness was associated with the use of financial reward and psychologist-led interventions. CONCLUSION: Group-based interventions were more effective than individual-based interventions among a predominantly female participant pool receiving psychologist-led interventions. Future studies to explore differences by professional group and interventions among men, which are accompanied by economic evaluation, are recommended. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND: Both group and individual modes of delivery are employed for obesity treatments. Commercial weight loss groups commonly employ group-based delivery, while many clinical based settings employ one-to-one delivery. We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of treatments for adult obesity to compare the effectiveness of group-based to individual-based modes of treatment delivery. METHODS: We searched 7 electronic databases and 2 journals and reviewed secondary references, based on a priori criteria to systematically review: randomised controlled trials of obesity treatments, participants with BMI >or=28 kg/m(2), age >or=18 years, comparison groups including at least 1 group-based and 1 individual-based treatment group, and follow-up >or=1 year. We extracted data and conducted meta-analysis of weight change. RESULTS: Eleven comparison groups from 5 qualifying trials were obtained, representing a total participant pool of 336. Significantly greater (p = 0.03) weight change at 12 months was found in group-based over individualbased treatment, and sub-analyses showed that increased effectiveness was associated with the use of financial reward and psychologist-led interventions. CONCLUSION: Group-based interventions were more effective than individual-based interventions among a predominantly female participant pool receiving psychologist-led interventions. Future studies to explore differences by professional group and interventions among men, which are accompanied by economic evaluation, are recommended. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: David L Katz; Wendy Chan; Maura Gonzalez; David Larson; Haq Nawaz; Mustapha Abdulrahman; Ming-Chin Yeh Journal: Prev Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: A Avenell; J Broom; T J Brown; A Poobalan; L Aucott; S C Stearns; W C S Smith; R T Jung; M K Campbell; A M Grant Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Nia S Mitchell; Sarit Polsky; Victoria A Catenacci; Anna L Furniss; Allan V Prochazka Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Scott D Halpern; Benjamin French; Dylan S Small; Kathryn Saulsgiver; Michael O Harhay; Janet Audrain-McGovern; George Loewenstein; Troyen A Brennan; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christie A Befort; Jennifer R Klemp; Debra K Sullivan; Theresa Shireman; Francisco J Diaz; Kathryn Schmitz; Michael G Perri; Carol Fabian Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: M E Whelan; A D Goode; E G Eakin; J L Veerman; E A H Winkler; I J Hickman; M M Reeves Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.046