Literature DB >> 33495253

Message framing to inform cancer prevention pricing interventions in the UK and USA: a factorial experiment, 2019.

Joseph G L Lee1,2, Julie V Cristello3, Christina H Buckton4, Rachel N Carey5, Elisa M Trucco6,7, Paulina M Schenk5, Theresa Ikegwuonu4, Shona Hilton4, Shelley D Golden2,8, David I Conway9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To advance understanding of how message framing can be used to maximise public support across different pricing policies for alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks/foods that prevent consumption of cancer-causing products.
DESIGN: We designed a 3×4×3 randomised factorial experiment to test responses to messages with three pricing policies, four message frames and three products.
SETTING: Online survey panel (Qualtrics) in 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=1850) from the UK and USA.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants randomly viewed one of 36 separate messages that varied by pricing policy (increasing taxes, getting rid of price discounts, getting rid of low-cost products), four frames and product (alcohol, tobacco, sugary drinks/foods). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed the relationship between the message characteristics and four dependent variables. Three were related to policy support: (1) increasing taxes on the product mentioned in the message, (2) getting rid of price discounts and special offers on the product mentioned in the message and (3) getting rid of low-cost versions of the product mentioned in the message. One was related to reactance, a psychological response to having one's freedom limited.
RESULTS: We found no effect for pricing policy in the message. Frames regarding children and reducing cancer risk moderated some outcomes, showing promise for real-world use. We found differences in support by product and reactance with greatest support and least reactance for tobacco policies, less support and more reactance for alcohol policies, and the least support and most reactance for sugary drinks/foods policies.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer prevention efforts using policy interventions can be informed by the message framing literature. Our results offer insights for cancer prevention advocacy efforts across the UK and USA and highlight that tax versus non-tax approaches to increasing the cost of cancer-causing products result in similar responses from consumers. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health policy; preventive medicine; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33495253      PMCID: PMC7839858          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   3.006


  45 in total

Review 1.  Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies.

Authors:  Alexander C Wagenaar; Matthew J Salois; Kelli A Komro
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Jeff Niederdeppe; Sarah E Gollust
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Similarities and Differences in Tobacco Control Research Findings From Convenience and Probability Samples.

Authors:  Michelle Jeong; Dongyu Zhang; Jennifer C Morgan; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Amira Osman; Marcella H Boynton; Jennifer R Mendel; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-28

4.  Reactance to Health Warnings Scale: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Laura E Bach; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-10

Review 5.  Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes.

Authors:  L M Powell; J F Chriqui; T Khan; R Wada; F J Chaloupka
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 9.213

6.  Changing policy framing as a deliberate strategy for public health advocacy: a qualitative policy case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol.

Authors:  Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Lyndal Bond; Shona Hilton
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Public Acceptability in the UK and USA of Nudging to Reduce Obesity: The Example of Reducing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Consumption.

Authors:  Dragos C Petrescu; Gareth J Hollands; Dominique-Laurent Couturier; Yin-Lam Ng; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Beyond excise taxes: a systematic review of literature on non-tax policy approaches to raising tobacco product prices.

Authors:  Shelley D Golden; Margaret Holt Smith; Ellen C Feighery; April Roeseler; Todd Rogers; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9.  Corporate practices and health: a framework and mechanisms.

Authors:  Joana Madureira Lima; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.185

10.  Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking.

Authors:  Shelley D Golden; Matthew C Farrelly; Douglas A Luke; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.