Literature DB >> 33494131

A study of pathological characteristics and BRAF V600E status in Langerhans cell histiocytosis of Vietnamese children.

Thu Dang Anh Phan1, Bao Gia Phung2, Tu Thanh Duong1, Vu Anh Hoang3, Dat Quoc Ngo1, Nguyen Dinh The Trinh4, Tung Thanh Tran4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is more common in children than adults and involves many organs. In children, the BRAF V600E mutation is associated with recurrent and high-risk LCH.
METHODS: We collected paraffin blocks of 94 pediatric LCH patients to detect BRAF V600E mutation by sequencing. The relationship between BRAF V600E status and clinicopathological parameters were also critically analyzed.
RESULTS: BRAF V600E mutation exon 15 was detected in 45 cases (47.9%). Multiple systems LCH showed a significantly higher BRAF V600E mutation rate than a single system (p=.001). No statistical significance was evident for other clinical characteristics such as age, sex, location, risk organs involvement, and CD1a expression.
CONCLUSIONS: In Vietnamese LCH children, the proportion of BRAF V600E mutational status was relatively high and related to multiple systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF V600E mutation; Langerhans cell histiocytosis; Sequencing

Year:  2021        PMID: 33494131      PMCID: PMC7987525          DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2020.11.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med        ISSN: 2383-7837


Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease defined by proliferation of Langerhans cells with highly heterogeneous presentations and clinical courses [1,2]. The condition can occur at any age but is more common in children. LCH can involve one organ, so-called single system, or more than one organ, termed multisystem or multiple systems (MS-LCH). LCH has been referred to by various names, including localized eosinophilic granuloma of the bone, Letterer-Siwe disease, Hand-Schuller-Christian disease, and histiocytosis X [3,4]. Children under 2 years old with MS-LCH commonly exhibit risk organ involvement, such as the liver, spleen, and hematopoietic system. Although typical morphology can identify the pathologic Langerhans cells, confirming their nature requires positive staining for CD1a and CD207 or identifying Birbeck particles under electron microscopy [5,6]. The clinical prognosis of LCH can be extremely variable. The patients with multiple systems, risk organ involvement likely have a more unsatisfactory outcome and are at risk for reactivations [7]. Fortunately, recent molecular findings promise a targeted therapy for high-risk pediatric patients with risk organ involvement, for those who fail standard treatment and those with relapses [4]. BRAF is an oncogene that has a critical role in the Ras-ERK signaling cascade, a primary regulator of cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Therefore, BRAF mutations contribute to many human cancers’ pathogenesis, most commonly melanoma, thyroid papillary carcinoma, and colorectal carcinoma [8,9]. The primary mutation point is the valine codon in position 600 located in exon 15 (V600E mutation), which replaces nucleotide at 1799 T → A in the BRAF gene, resulting in the replacement of valine amino acid by glutamate [8-10]. The BRAF V600E mutation is also the potential target for treatment with Vemurafenib—an inhibitor used in many malignancies, most notably melanoma, and recently reported in LCH [9,11]. Thus, BRAF V600E may be a potential marker for targeted therapy in aggressive LCH. Several studies have shown that the presence of BRAF V600E mutation is associated with a higher risk of recurrence and organ involvement in pediatric LCH [12-14]. This study analyzed the BRAF V600E mutation by sequencing tumor DNA and the relationship between the genetic alteration and clinicopathological characteristics of LCH children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and sample collection

The study consisted of 94 cases diagnosed with LCH at the Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from 2012 to 2018. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue with well-defined histology of LCH on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections and positive CD1a staining (using monoclonal antibody CD1a, clone 010, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were collected. We analyzed the intensity of CD1a expression as low expression (moderate membrane and cytoplasmic staining) and high expression (strong membrane and cytoplasmic staining). All paraffin blocks were well preserved and available for DNA sequencing. All slides were re-examined to confirm the diagnosis and to select the paraffin blocks for molecular testing. Clinical information, age, sex, location, histopathology, and risk organ were obtained.

Analysis of BRAF V600E mutation

Tumor cells were selected based on H&E slides and were targeted for DNA extraction by macrodissection scraping. DNA was isolated from a 5-μm-thick tumor using the ReliaPrep FFPE gDNA Miniprep System kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification of the BRAF exon 15 was performed using TaKaRa Taq HotStart Polymerase (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) with primers BRAF-600F (5′-ACTCTTCATAATGCTTGCTC-3′) and BRAF-600R (5′-CCACAAAATGGATCCAGACA-3′). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) included initial denaturation at 98°C for 3 minutes followed by 45 cycles of 98°C for 10 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 40 seconds, with a final elongation of 72°C for 2 minutes. PCR product was purified enzymatically using the ExoSAP IT PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to remove excess primers and dNTPs before Sanger sequencing using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Kit and the ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR fragment was sequenced and analyzed in both directions. The sequence was finally compared to the reference sequence of the BRAF gene (GenBank accession number: NG_007873).

Statistical analyses

The correlation between BRAF V600E mutation and age, sex, tumor location, and organ involvement was analyzed by the chisquare test. p<.05 was considered a significant difference. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Characteristics of pediatric LCH

In 94 cases of LCH, the median age was 3.02 years (range, 0 to 12 years; minimum, 10 days old). LCH was most frequently found in the age group of under 3 (60.6%), in which 1-year-old patients were predominant (56.1%, 32/ 57 cases). LCH was more common in males than in females, with a male: female ratio of 1.4. Soft tissues were the most common biopsy location (n=39, 41.5%), followed by the skin (n=30, 31.9%), bones (n=18, 19.1%), lymph nodes (n=6, 6.4%) and lung (n=1, 1.1%). The clinicopathologic features are summarized in Table 1. Forty-eight patients (51.1%) had single system involved, while 46 patients (48.9%) had multiple systems involved. Risk organ involvement was observed in 35 patients (37.2%). The Langerhans cells were pathologically characterized by abundant pale cytoplasm and folded nuclei (Fig. 1) that expressed CD1a. The intensity of CD1a staining was also divided into low and high expression (33% vs. 67%).
Table 1

The clinical characteristics and BRAF V600E status of Vietnamese pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis

Clinical parameterTotalBRAF V600E mutated
No.9445 (47.9)
Age (yr)3.0 ± 2.9 (0–12 yr; minimum, 10 days)
Under 3 yr57 (60.6)27 (46.6)
Sex
 Male55 (58.5)25 (55.6)
 Female39 (41.5)20 (44.4)
Location
 Skin30 (31.9)13 (28.9)
 Lymph node6 (6.4)2 (4.4)
 Soft tissues39 (41.5)23 (51.1)
 Bone18 (19.1)7 (15.5)
 Lung1 (1.1)0
System involvement
 Single system48 (51.1)15 (31.3)
 Multiple system46 (48.9)30 (65.2)
Risk organ involvement35 (37.2)18 (51.4)
CD1a expression
 Low31 (33.0)12 (38.7)
 High63 (67.0)33 (52.4)

Values are presented as number (%).

Fig. 1

Langerhans cell histiocytosis on hematoxylin and eosin staining: (A) skin lesion, (B) soft tissue of the head and neck, (C) bone lesion, and (D) lymph node lesion.

BRAF mutation analysis

Sequencing analyses for all 94 patients successfully defined BRAF V600E status. BRAF V600E mutation exon 15 was found in 45 cases (47.9%) (Fig. 2). In Table 2, we demonstrate the relation between BRAF V600E mutation and clinical parameters. Multiple system LCH showed a significantly higher BRAF V600E mutation rate than the single system LCH (p=.001). There was no significant difference between BRAF status and other clinical characteristics such as age, sex, location, risk organs involvement, and CD1a expression.
Fig. 2

The BRAF V600E status in pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Table 2

The correlation of BRAF_V600E status and clinical parameters of Vietnamese LCH patients (n=94)

Clinical parameterBRAF V600E mutatedBRAF V600E Wild typep-value
Age (yr).903
 <32730
 ≥31819
Sex.577
 Male2530
 Female2019
Skin lesions.546
 Present1317
 Absent3232
Soft tissue.070
 Present2316
 Absent2233
Bone lesions.396
 Present711
 Absent3838
System involvement.001
 Single system1533
 Multiple systems3016
Risk organ involvement1817.595
CD1a expression.212
 Low1219
 High3330

LCH, Langerhans histiocytosis; NS, nonsignificant.

DISCUSSION

BRAF mutations play the leading role in the oncogenesis of human cancers because of their involvement in the Ras-ERK signaling cascade, which regulates cellular motility, proliferation, and survival. Recent studies have found somatic mutations that trigger mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in most LCH patients [13,15-19]. In particular, the BRAF V600E mutation is found in more than 50% of LCH lesions in children, while other modifications of the codon V600 such as V600K, V600D, or V600R are not present in this disease [20]. The BRAF mutation presentation appears to be complicated; however, the most common point mutation is V600E (the valine codon in position 600, located in exon 15). Most BRAF mutations are detected in exons 11 and 15 by DNA-based sequencing assays [8]. In particular, more than 80% of all BRAF mutations are in exon 15, which results in changing valine for glutamic acid at codon 600 (V600E) [10]. Exon 11 mutations seem to be rare in LCH. Alayed et al. [21] detected BRAF mutations in LCH by pyrosequencing assays and found exon 15 BRAF V600E mutation and no exon 11 mutations in all cases. This study found 47.9% of cases with BRAF mutations detected in exon 15 (BRAF V600E). Our data showed that the BRAF V600E mutation in Vietnamese pediatric LCH was relatively high but unrelated to sex, age, and risk organ involvement. In previous studies on Caucasian children, BRAF mutation frequency varied from 33% to 69% [12,13,16,19,22]. The study of Heritier et al. [12] on 315 pediatric LCH patients determined 173 cases (54.6%) with BRAF V600E mutation. They also showed a significant relationship between BRAF V600E mutation with age under 3 years old and multisystem disease, mostly when there was a risk of organ involvement. Badalian-Very et al. [23] also reported that the incidence of BRAF V600E mutation was 57% in 61 LCH patients, predominantly in patients with bone involvement. The mutation rate was also reportedly higher in young patients, especially children under age 15. Ozer et al. [24] showed that 70% of pediatric LCH patients younger than 2 years of age significantly harbored BRAF V600E mutation. However, the ratio of BRAF V600E status in pediatric LCH reported in some Asian populations was lower. Sasaki et al. [25]_ demonstrated 21% BRAF V600E mutations in Japanese patients (4/19 cases); Go et al. [26] showed 25% (7/28 cases) in South Korean patients. These studies showed a different BRAF V600E status across the various population, which raised a possible question of racial involvement on genetic profile. Moreover, the BRAF V600E mutation status showed variable distribution in some specific organs. Liu et al. [27] showed that 50% of bone lesions in the head and neck (18/36 cases) were identified with BRAF V600E mutation. Other studies found the transformation in over 70% of skin cases [12,24], especially in multifocal skin involvement and multisystem disease. In the present study, the BRAF V600E mutation was detected mostly in LCH of the soft tissues (51.1%), followed by skin (28.9%), bone (15.5%), and lymph nodes (4.4%). In our study, 13/30 (43.3%) skin cases harbored BRAF V600E mutation, lower than Ozer et al. [24] (77.8%) and Heritier et al. [12] (77.0%). False-negative results may occur in small-sized tumors such as skin lesions due to an insufficient amount of tumor cells. In this study, 7/18 (38.9%) cases of LCH bone lesions harbored BRAF mutation; therefore, the current decalcifying solution possibly did little harm to DNA quality. Furthermore, no significant relation between BRAF V600E status and LCH location was observed in this study and others [12,24]. In 94 patients of this study, BRAF V600E mutation was significantly associated with multisystem involvement (p=0.001). Similarly, Heritier et al. [12] showed that BRAF V600E mutation correlated with high-risk LCH, including multiple systems and risk organ involvement, resulting in permanent, irreversible damage. Adding to these points, Heritier et al. [12] showed that patients with BRAF V600E more commonly displayed resistance to combined vinblastine corticosteroid therapy, higher reactivation rate, long-term consequences from disease or treatment. Ozer et al. [24] also found a statistical relationship between BRAF mutation and risk organ lesions. However, in this study, risk organ lesions showed no significant relation to BRAF status. The prevalence of LCH BRAF mutation and its association with increased risk condition such as multiple systems or risk organs involvement possibly suggests a targeted treatment using BRAF inhibitors for those that harbor the mutation. In conclusion, the BRAF V600E status was detected with high frequency in Vietnamese pediatric LCH and may become a useful prognostic marker due to its association with multiple system LCH. The identification of aggressive LCH based on genetic alterations is required for disease management and BRAF inhibitors.
  26 in total

1.  BRAFV600E mutant protein is expressed in cells of variable maturation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  Felix Sahm; David Capper; Matthias Preusser; Jochen Meyer; Albrecht Stenzinger; Felix Lasitschka; Anna-Sophie Berghoff; Antje Habel; Marion Schneider; Andreas Kulozik; Ioannis Anagnostopoulos; Leonhard Müllauer; Gunhild Mechtersheimer; Andreas von Deimling
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The use of BRAF V600E mutation-specific immunohistochemistry in pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  Leomar Y Ballester; Miguel D Cantu; Karen P H Lim; Stephen F Sarabia; Lizmery Suarez Ferguson; C Renee Webb; Carl E Allen; Kenneth L McClain; Carrie A Mohila; Jyotinder N Punia; Angshumoy Roy; Dolores H López-Terrada; M John Hicks; Kevin E Fisher
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 5.271

3.  BRAF and MAP2K1 mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a study of 50 cases.

Authors:  Khaled Alayed; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Keyur P Patel; Zhuang Zuo; Shaoying Li; Shalini Verma; John Galbincea; R Craig Cason; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; C Cameron Yin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 4.  Multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children: current treatment and future directions.

Authors:  Milen Minkov
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Somatic activating ARAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  David S Nelson; Willemijn Quispel; Gayane Badalian-Very; Astrid G S van Halteren; Cor van den Bos; Judith V M G Bovée; Sara Y Tian; Paul Van Hummelen; Matthew Ducar; Laura E MacConaill; R Maarten Egeler; Barrett J Rollins
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Incidence and clinical features of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  J A Salotti; V Nanduri; M S Pearce; L Parker; R Lynn; K P Windebank
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  B-Raf Inhibition in the Clinic: Present and Future.

Authors:  Warren Fiskus; Nicholas Mitsiades
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 13.739

8.  BRAF Mutation Correlates With High-Risk Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis and Increased Resistance to First-Line Therapy.

Authors:  Sébastien Héritier; Jean-François Emile; Mohamed-Aziz Barkaoui; Caroline Thomas; Sylvie Fraitag; Sabah Boudjemaa; Florence Renaud; Anne Moreau; Michel Peuchmaur; Catherine Chassagne-Clément; Frédérique Dijoud; Valérie Rigau; Despina Moshous; Anne Lambilliotte; Françoise Mazingue; Kamila Kebaili; Jean Miron; Eric Jeziorski; Geneviève Plat; Nathalie Aladjidi; Alina Ferster; Hélène Pacquement; Claire Galambrun; Laurence Brugières; Guy Leverger; Ludovic Mansuy; Catherine Paillard; Anne Deville; Corinne Armari-Alla; Anne Lutun; Marion Gillibert-Yvert; Jean-Louis Stephan; Fleur Cohen-Aubart; Julien Haroche; Isabelle Pellier; Frédéric Millot; Brigitte Lescoeur; Virginie Gandemer; Christine Bodemer; Roger Lacave; Zofia Hélias-Rodzewicz; Valérie Taly; Frédéric Geissmann; Jean Donadieu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma.

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; John M Kirkwood; Jean-Jacques Grob; Ester Simeone; Antonio M Grimaldi; Michele Maio; Giuseppe Palmieri; Alessandro Testori; Francesco M Marincola; Nicola Mozzillo
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.