| Literature DB >> 33494130 |
Leila Mirzaei1, Keyhan Ashrafi1, Zahra Atrkar Roushan2, Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi1, Irandokht Shenavar Masooleh3, Behnaz Rahmati1, Farshid Saadat1, Hamed Mirjalali4, Meysam Sharifdini1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis and other intestinal parasites in patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs in northern Iran and to investigate related risk factors. <br> METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 494 patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs, including cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (n=188) and those treated with prolonged corticosteroid administration (n=306). All fresh fecal samples were examined using the direct wet-mount, formalin ethyl acetate concentration, and agar plate culture techniques. <br> RESULTS: In total, 16.8% of patients were positive for at least 1 intestinal parasite; the helminthic and protozoan infection rates were 5.1% and 12.3%, respectively. The infection rate was significantly higher in corticosteroid-treated individuals (19.6%) than cancer patients (12.2%) (p<0.05). The prevalence rate of S. stercoralis among patients receiving chemotherapy and those treated with corticosteroids were 4.3% and 5.2%, respectively. The prevalence rate of S. stercoralis infection was significantly higher in older patients (p<0.05). <br> CONCLUSIONS: Strongyloidiasis is one of the most common parasites among patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs in northern Iran. Early diagnosis and proper treatment of these patients are necessary to minimize the complications of severe strongyloidiasis.Entities:
Keywords: Immunocompromised patients; Iran; Risk factors; Strongyloidiasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33494130 PMCID: PMC8060525 DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2021009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Health ISSN: 2092-7193
Figure 1.Map of Iran showing the geographical location of Guilan Province in northern Iran.
Prevalence of infections with intestinal parasites in patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs in Guilan Province, northern Iran, according to demographic factors
| Variables | Positive, n (%) | Negative, n (%) | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 0.669 | |||
| <40 | 12 (13.8) | 75 (86.2) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| 40-60 | 43 (18.1) | 195 (81.9) | 0.80 (0.38, 1.67) | |
| >60 | 28 (16.6) | 141 (83.2) | 1.11 (0.65, 1.87) | |
| Sex | 0.399 | |||
| Female | 41 (15.4) | 225 (84.6) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Male | 42 (18.4) | 186 (81.6) | 0.80 (0.50, 1.29) | |
| Educational status | 0.672 | |||
| Illiterate | 23 (17.6) | 108 (82.4) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Under diploma | 43 (17.7) | 200 (82.3) | 1.29 (0.65, 2.55) | |
| Diploma and above | 17 (14.1) | 103 (85.8) | 1.30 (0.70, 2.39) | |
| Occupation | 0.676 | |||
| Farmer | 16 (19.8) | 65 (80.2) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Government employee | 2 (9.5) | 19 (90.5) | 1.02 (0.50, 2.11) | |
| Worker | 9 (13.6) | 57 (86.4) | 0.44 (0.09, 2.03) | |
| Housewife | 34 (16.0) | 178 (84.0) | 0.66 (0.28, 1.53) | |
| Other | 22 (19.3) | 92 (80.7) | 0.79 (0.44, 1.44) | |
| Location | 0.227 | |||
| City | 33 (14.4) | 196 (85.6) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Village | 50 (18.9) | 215 (81.1) | 0.72 (0.44, 1.17) |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Prevalence of infections with different species of intestinal parasites in patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs in Guilan Province, northern Iran
| Intestinal parasites | n (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Single | 4 (0.8) | |
| 6 (1.2) | ||
| 46 (9.3) | ||
| 1 (0.2) | ||
| 20 (4.0) | ||
| Double | 3 (0.6) | |
| 1 (0.2) | ||
| 1 (0.2) | ||
| 1 (0.2) | ||
Figure 2.Rhabditiform (A) and filariform (B) larvae of Strongyloides stercoralis obtained through agar plate culture.
Prevalence of infections with Strongyloides stercoralis in patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs in Guilan Province, northern Iran, according to demographic factors
| Variables | Positive, n (%) | Negative, n (%) | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 0.020 | |||
| <40 | 1 (1.1) | 86 (98.9) | 0.12 (0.17, 0.99) | |
| 40-60 | 9 (3.8) | 229 (96.2) | 0.43 (0.18, 1.03) | |
| >60 | 14 (8.3) | 155 (91.7) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Sex | 0.530 | |||
| Female | 11 (4.1) | 255 (95.9) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Male | 13 (5.7) | 215 (94.3) | 0.71 (0.31, 1.62) | |
| Educational status | 0.088 | |||
| Illiterate | 11 (8.4) | 120 (91.6) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Under diploma | 9 (3.7) | 234 (96.3) | 2.65 (0.82, 8.58) | |
| Diploma and above | 4 (3.3) | 116 (96.7) | 1.11 (0.33, 3.69) | |
| Occupation | 0.080 | |||
| Farmer | 9 (11.1) | 72 (88.9) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Government employee | 1 (4.8) | 20 (95.2) | 2.72 (0.87, 8.46) | |
| Worker | 1 (1.5) | 65 (98.5) | 1.09 (0.12, 9.83) | |
| Housewife | 8 (3.8) | 204 (96.2) | 0.33 (0.03, 2.93) | |
| Other | 5 (4.4) | 109 (95.6) | 0.85 (0.27, 2.67) | |
| Location | 0.408 | |||
| City | 9 (3.9) | 220 (96.1) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| Village | 15 (5.7) | 250 (94.3) | 0.68 (0.29, 1.58) |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.