Literature DB >> 33493166

Pupillary reflex and behavioral masking responses to light as functional measures of retinal degeneration in mice.

Ethan O Contreras1,2, Carley G Dearing1,2,3, Crystal A Ashinhurst1,2, Betty A Fish1,2, Sajila N Hossain1,2, Ariana M Rey1,2, Primal D Silva1,2, Stewart Thompson1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre-clinical testing of retinal pathology and treatment efficacy depends on reliable and valid measures of retinal function. The electroretinogram (ERG) and tests of visual acuity are the ideal standard, but can be unmeasurable while useful vision remains. Non-image-forming responses to light such as the pupillary light reflex (PLR) are attractive surrogates. However, it is not clear how accurately such responses reflect changes in visual capability in specific disease models. The purpose of this study was to test whether measures of non-visual responses to light correlate with previously determined visual function in two photoreceptor degenerations.
METHODS: The sensitivity of masking behavior (light induced changes in running wheel activity) and the PLR were measured in 3-month-old wild-type mice (WT) with intact inner retinal circuitry, Pde6b-rd1/rd1 mice (rd1) with early and rapid loss of rods and cones, and Prph2-Rd2/Rd2 mice (Rd2) with a slower progressive loss of rods and cones.
RESULTS: In rd1 mice, negative masking had increased sensitivity, positive masking was absent, and the sensitivity of the PLR was severely reduced. In Rd2 mice, positive masking identified useful vision at higher light levels, but there was a limited decrease in the irradiance sensitivity of negative masking and the PLR, and the amplitude of change for both underestimated the reduction in irradiance sensitivity of image-forming vision.
CONCLUSIONS: Together these data show that in a given disease, two responses to light can be affected in opposite ways, and that for a given response to light, the change in the response does not accurately represent the degree of pathology. However, the extent of the deficit in the PLR means that even a limited rescue of rod/cone function might be measured by increased PLR amplitude. In addition, positive masking has the potential to measure effective treatment in both models by restoring responses or shifting thresholds to lower irradiances.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33493166      PMCID: PMC7833141          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  46 in total

1.  Effects of hereditary retinal degeneration due to a CEP290 mutation on the feline pupillary light reflex.

Authors:  Stewart Thompson; Rebecca E H Whiting; Randy H Kardon; Edwin M Stone; Kristina Narfström
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.644

2.  Ultraviolet light-induced and green light-induced transient pupillary light reflex in mice.

Authors:  Gang Yao; Keqing Zhang; Matthew Bellassai; Bo Chang; Bo Lei
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.424

Review 3.  Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse.

Authors:  B Chang; N L Hawes; R E Hurd; M T Davisson; S Nusinowitz; J R Heckenlively
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Mouse mutants as models for congenital retinal disorders.

Authors:  Claudia Dalke; Jochen Graw
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system.

Authors:  Glen T Prusky; Nazia M Alam; Steven Beekman; Robert M Douglas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Gene therapy restores vision-dependent behavior as well as retinal structure and function in a mouse model of RPE65 Leber congenital amaurosis.

Authors:  Ji-jing Pang; Bo Chang; Ashok Kumar; Steven Nusinowitz; Syed M Noorwez; Jie Li; Asha Rani; Thomas C Foster; Vince A Chiodo; Thomas Doyle; Huashi Li; Ritu Malhotra; Jacqueline T Teusner; J Hugh McDowell; Seok-Hong Min; Qiuhong Li; Shalesh Kaushal; William W Hauswirth
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Impaired masking responses to light in melanopsin-knockout mice.

Authors:  N Mrosovsky; S Hattar
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Divergent phenotypes of vision and accessory visual function in mice with visual cycle dysfunction (Rpe65 rd12) or retinal degeneration (rd/rd).

Authors:  Stewart Thompson; Robert F Mullins; Alisdair R Philp; Edwin M Stone; N Mrosovsky
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  Biology and therapy of inherited retinal degenerative disease: insights from mouse models.

Authors:  Shobi Veleri; Csilla H Lazar; Bo Chang; Paul A Sieving; Eyal Banin; Anand Swaroop
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.758

10.  Chromatic Pupillometry in Children.

Authors:  Sylvain V Crippa; Fatima Pedrosa Domellöf; Aki Kawasaki
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Cage Position and Light Transmission on Home Cage Activity and Circadian Entrainment in Mice.

Authors:  Laura C E Steel; Selma Tir; Shu K E Tam; James N Bussell; Manuel Spitschan; Russell G Foster; Stuart N Peirson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Melatonin Adjusts the Phase of Mouse Circadian Clocks in the Cornea Both Ex Vivo and In Vivo.

Authors:  Alex V Huynh; Ethan D Buhr
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.182

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.