Literature DB >> 3349277

Grading in superficial bladder cancer. (1). Morphological criteria.

R P Pauwels1, R F Schapers, A W Smeets, F M Debruyne, J P Geraedts.   

Abstract

In a prospective study on the grading of superficial papillary neoplasms of the bladder a distinction was made between tumours showing only increased cellularity without appreciable cellular and nuclear deviation (grade 1), tumours showing slight cellular variation (grade 2a), and tumours showing clear cytological deviation and a tendency to lose normal polarity (grade 2b). Ninety-one patients with a superficial tumour were followed up for a mean of 24 months. Grade 2a tumours recurred later and in fewer patients than grade 2b tumours. Progression was seen in 4% of grade 2a tumours and in 33% of grade 2b carcinomas. Adapting our results to the WHO grading system, we suggest that all tumours in this study defined as grades 1 and 2a should be classified as low grade and tumours defined as grade 2b should be classified as intermediate grade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3349277     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb05060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  12 in total

1.  Histological grading of papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: prognostic value of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification system and comparison with conventional grading systems.

Authors:  J W A Oosterhuis; R F M Schapers; M L G Janssen-Heijnen; R P E Pauwels; D W Newling; F ten Kate
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Profile of lesions in cystoscopic bladder biopsies: a histopathological study.

Authors:  Raghuveer C V; Sanjay Hingle
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

3.  Accuracy of grading of urothelial carcinoma on urine cytology: an analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  Michelle D Reid; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Momin T Siddiqui; Stephen W Looney
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2012-10-20

Review 4.  Reproducibility and reliability of tumor grading in urological neoplasms.

Authors:  Rainer Engers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Growth pattern in superficial urothelial bladder carcinomas. Histological review and clinical relevance.

Authors:  José I López; Javier C Angulo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  The value of tumour spread, grading and growth pattern as morphological predictive parameters in bladder carcinoma. A critical revision of the 1987 TNM classification.

Authors:  J C Angulo; J I Lopez; N Flores; J D Toledo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Superficial bladder cancer: an update on etiology, molecular development, classification, and natural history.

Authors:  Erik Pasin; David Y Josephson; Anirban P Mitra; Richard J Cote; John P Stein
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

8.  Histological classification and stage of newly diagnosed bladder cancer in a population-based study from the Northeastern United States.

Authors:  Alan R Schned; Angeline S Andrew; Carmen J Marsit; Karl T Kelsey; Michael S Zens; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008

9.  Recurrence of high-risk bladder cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Karim Chamie; Mark S Litwin; Jeffrey C Bassett; Timothy J Daskivich; Julie Lai; Jan M Hanley; Badrinath R Konety; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Reproducibility of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Kutsal Yorukoglu; Burcin Tuna; Emel Dikicioglu; Ender Duzcan; Aydin Isisag; Sait Sen; Ugur Mungan; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.