Literature DB >> 33492515

Modern 3D cephalometry in pediatric orthodontics-downsizing the FOV and development of a new 3D cephalometric analysis within a minimized large FOV for dose reduction.

Pamela Kissel1, James K Mah2, Axel Bumann3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Dose reduction achieved by downsizing the field of view (FOV) in CBCT scans has brought no benefit for pediatric orthodontics, until now. Standard 2D or 3D full-size cephalometric analyses require large FOVs and high effective doses. The aim of this study was to compare a new 3D reduced-FOV analysis using the Frankfurt horizontal (FH) plane as reference plane with a conventional full-size analysis using the Sella-Nasion (S-N) plane as reference plane.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight CBCT data sets were evaluated using full- and reduced-FOV analysis. The measurements of a total of 20 skeletal and dental standard 3D full-size variables were compared with the measurements of 22 corresponding 3D reduced-FOV variables. Statistical analysis was performed to prove mathematic relation between standard and alternative variables. Regression analyses were carried out.
RESULTS: Coefficients of determination (R2) between 0.15 and 0.95 (p < 0.001-0.055) were described. All variables showed obvious relations of different strength except for SNA and its alternative Po_R-Or_R-A (°) (R2 = 0.15, p = 0.055), but a second variable Ba_A (mm) showed stronger relation (R2 = 0.28, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: All standard variables related to the reference plane S-N could be described with alternative variables related to the FH. Further research should define more reliable landmarks for coordinate systems and reference points. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Minimized large FOVs meet the demand of 3D cephalometric analyses and enable the application of CBCT scans in pediatric orthodontic patients in many specific indications. Dose reduction is accompanied by increasing access to all the advantages of 3D imaging over 2D imaging.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D cephalometric analysis; Cone-beam computed imaging; Dose reduction; Pediatric orthodontic patients; Reduced field of view; Reference plane

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33492515     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03779-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  64 in total

1.  Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.

Authors:  Ali Alqerban; Reinhilde Jacobs; Steffen Fieuws; Guy Willems
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT scans of impacted maxillary canines.

Authors:  Elmira Pakbaznejad Esmaeili; Anne-Mari Ilo; Janna Waltimo-Sirén; Marja Ekholm
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  What are the cancer risks from dental computed tomography?

Authors:  P P Hujoel; J K Aps; A-M Bollen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  CBCT assessment of upper airway changes and treatment outcomes of obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noura A Alsufyani; Mohammed A Q Al-Saleh; Paul W Major
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.

Authors:  Ali Alqerban; Guy Willems; Christien Bernaerts; Jan Vangastel; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis.

Authors:  Susanne Wriedt; Jennifer Jaklin; Bilal Al-Nawas; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Airway volume analysis: is there a correlation between two and three-dimensions?

Authors:  Luize Severo Martins; Gabriela Salatino Liedke; Luis Dias da Silveira Heraldo; Priscila Fernanda da Silveira; Nadia Assein Arus; Edwin M Ongkosuwito; Mariana Boessio Vizzotto
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  An analysis of effective dose optimization and its impact on image quality and diagnostic efficacy relating to dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

Authors:  Margarete B McGuigan; Henry F Duncan; Keith Horner
Journal:  Swiss Dent J       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 9.  Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging in orthodontics.

Authors:  W C Scarfe; B Azevedo; S Toghyani; A G Farman
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.291

Review 10.  Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana R Durão; Pisha Pittayapat; Maria Ivete B Rockenbach; Raphael Olszewski; Suk Ng; Afonso P Ferreira; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.