Literature DB >> 33492420

[Systematic and quality-assured early diagnosis of sporadic breast cancer : Update on screening effects and scientific studies].

Walter Heindel1, Karin Bock2, Gerold Hecht3, Sylvia Heywang-Köbrunner4, Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal5, Katja Siegmann-Luz6, Stefanie Weigel7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A quality-assured mammography screening programme has been available since 2009, nationwide, to all women in Germany between the ages of 50 and 69. The programme is based on the European Guidelines. In this review article the authors summarize the current status of scientific assessments of this national early detection programme for breast cancer and provide an outlook regarding ongoing studies on effectiveness tests and further development.
RESULTS: We expect a decline in mortality rates relating to breast cancer as a result of successfully bringing diagnoses forward and a decrease in advanced breast cancer after a repeated screening. The extent will be shown in the current ZEBra study on mortality evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Potential for a further increase in the effectiveness of the systematic early detection of breast cancer can be identified in four areas: (1) More women should take advantage of the early detection opportunities offered by the medical insurance funds; so far, on average, only about 50% of the women between 50 and 69 who are entitled to a screening examination actually take part in the programme. (2) Entitlement to take part in the programme should be extended to women over 70. (3) The further development of digital mammography towards digital breast tomosynthesis promises to reduce the number of false positive recalls while at the same time increasing sensitivity. (4) There should be scientific studies relating to an extension of screening strategies for the small number of women in the entitlement range who have extremly dense breasts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced tumor stages; Breast cancer; Breast cancer-related mortality; Cancer registry; Quality-assured mammography screening program

Year:  2021        PMID: 33492420      PMCID: PMC7851039          DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00803-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  7 in total

Review 1.  Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Joy Melnikow; Joshua J Fenton; Evelyn P Whitlock; Diana L Miglioretti; Meghan S Weyrich; Jamie H Thompson; Kunal Shah
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Reduction of Advanced Breast Cancer Stages at Subsequent Participation in Mammography Screening.

Authors:  S Weigel; W Heindel; J Heidrich; O Heidinger; H W Hense
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2015-10-20

3.  Stratification of Breast Cancer Risk in Terms of the Influence of Age and Mammographic density.

Authors:  Stefanie Weigel; Walter Heindel; Caroline Dietz; Ulrike Meyer-Johann; Axel Graewingholt; Hans Werner Hense
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2020-02-27

4.  The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia.

Authors:  Oliver Heidinger; Wolf Ulrich Batzler; Volker Krieg; Stefanie Weigel; Cornelis Biesheuvel; Walter Heindel; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Breast cancer incidence and mortality before and after implementation of the German mammography screening program.

Authors:  Alexander Katalinic; Nora Eisemann; Klaus Kraywinkel; Maria R Noftz; Joachim Hübner
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; William E Barlow; Sally D Herschorn; Donald L Weaver; Elisabeth F Beaber; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Kathryn P Lowry; Natasha K Stout; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Roberta M diFlorio-Alexander; Christopher I Li; Mitchell D Schnall; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Hsin Yuan; Hui-Chen Hsu; Ying-Yuan Chen; Chia-Hung Wu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.