| Literature DB >> 33490806 |
Leizhen Huang1, Bianyun Cai2, Yong Huang1, Jingcheng Wang1, Ce Zhu1, Kun Shi1, Yueming Song1, Ganjun Feng1, Limin Liu1, Li Zhang3.
Abstract
<span class="Chemical">Titanium (<span class="Chemical">Ti) and its alloys have been widely used in clinics as preferred materials for bone tissue repair and replacement. However, the lack of biological activity of Ti limits its clinical applications. Surface modification of Ti with bioactive elements has always been a research hotspot. In this study, to promote the osseointegration of Ti6Al4V (Ti64) implants, calcium (Ca), oxygen (O), and phosphorus (P) codoped multifunctional micro-nanohybrid coatings were prepared on a three-dimensional (3D) printed porous Ti64 surface by microarc oxidation (MAO) and a hydrothermal method (HT). The surface morphologies, chemical compositions, and surface/cell interactions of the obtained coatings were studied. In vitro experiments indicated that all hybrid coating-modified Ti64 implants could enhance protein adsorption and MC3T3 osteoblasts' activity, adhesion, and differentiation ability. In vivo experiments showed that the hybrid coating promoted early osseointegration. By comparison, microarc oxidation-treated Ti64 (M-Ti) has the best biological activity and the strongest ability of osseointegration. It provides important theoretical significance and potential application prospects for improving the biological activity of Ti implants.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33490806 PMCID: PMC7818615 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(A-a) Ti64 scaffold (Ti), (B-a) scaffold treated by the hydrothermal method (H-Ti), and (C-a) scaffold treated by the microarc oxidation method (M-Ti); (A-b–e; B-b–e; C-b–e) SEM surface morphologies of Ti, H-Ti, and M-Ti. (D) Energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) elemental analysis on the surfaces of three groups. (E) XPS analysis of three groups.
Figure 2(A) SEM images of the adhesion and spreading of osteoblasts cultured for 3 days, (B) confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of actin (red) and nucleus (blue) on the samples cultured for 3 days, (C) live/dead fluorescence staining of cells cultured for 3 days, and (D) cell viability was analyzed by flow cytometry. a, e, control; b, f, Ti group; c, g, H-Ti group; and d, h, M-Ti group. There was no significant difference in the percentage of living and dead cells among the four groups.
Figure 3(A) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity released during the first 3 days of incubation; (B) amount of total protein adsorbed at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 h of culture in each group; (C) cell adhesion measured by the CCK-8 assay after 0.5, 2, and 3 h of culture; and (D) cell proliferation measured by the CCK-8 assay after 1, 4, and 7 days of culture. **p < 0.01 compared to control and Ti groups, * p < 0.05 compared to the H-Ti group.
Figure 4a, Control; b, Ti group; c, H-Ti group; and d, M-Ti group. (A) ALP generated by cells cultured on different samples and results after culturing for 7 days and (C) ALP relative content. (B) ECM mineralized nodules generated by cells cultured on different samples after culturing for 15 days and (D) ECM relative content. There are significant differences between H-Ti and M-Ti compared with the control group and Ti group, and there are differences between H-Ti and M-Ti groups. **p < 0.01 compared to control and Ti groups, * p < 0.05 compared to the H-Ti group.
Figure 5Western blot assay analysis qualitatively (A) and quantitatively (B) on Runx-2, COL1A1, OCN, and OPN for detecting osteoblastic differentiation. **p < 0.01 compared to control and Ti groups, *p < 0.05 compared to the H-Ti group.
Figure 6mRNA expression levels of ALP (A), RUNX-2 (B), COL-1 (C), BMP-2 (D), and OCN (E) in osteoblasts cultured for 1, 4, and 7 days, detected by qRT-PCR. **p < 0.01 compared to control and Ti groups, *p < 0.05 compared to the H-Ti group.
Figure 7a, Ti group; b, H-Ti group; and c, M-Ti group. (A, B) Gross observation and μ-CT images of the bone–implant interface at 12 weeks postimplantation. (C) Quantitative analysis of osseointegration for μ-CT results. **p < 0.01 compared to control and Ti groups, *p < 0.05 compared to the H-Ti group.
Figure 8Histological observation of Ti group (A), H-Ti group (B), and M-Ti group (C). (D–F) Magnified images of the selected region corresponding to (A–C), respectively. Quantitative results of bone ingrowth (G) and bone–implant contact ratio (H) of the three experimental groups. **p < 0.01 compared to control and Ti groups, *p < 0.05 compared to the H-Ti group.
Reaction Conditions Used in This Study
| reactants | reaction conditions | sample name | acronym |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti64 powder | 3D printing | porous Ti64 scaffold | Ti |
| mH2O2/mH3PO4 =9:1 0.2 g/mL CaCl2 | 220 °C, 24 h 120 °C, 8 h | two-step hydrothermally treated Ti64 scaffold | H-Ti |
| 0.065 M Ca(CH3COO)2·H2O, 0.03 M NaH2PO4, 0.065 M EDTA-2Na, 0.5 M NaOH | 350 V, 500 Hz, 10%, 5 min | microarc oxidation-treated Ti64 scaffold | M-Ti |
Primers Used for qRT-PCR
| gene | foward primer sequence (5′–3′) | reverse primer sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
| ALP | AACGTGGCCAAGAACATCATCA | TGTCCATCTCCAGCCGTGTC |
| OCN | GGTGCAGACCTAGCAGACACCA | AGGTAGCGCCGGAGTCTATTCA |
| Col-1 | GCCTCCCAGAACATCACCTA | GCAGGGACTTCTTGAGGTTG |
| BMP-2 | CAACACCGTGCTCAGCTTCC | TTCCCACTCATTTCTGAAAGTTCC |
| RUNX-2 | CCATAACGGTCTTCACAAATCCT | TCTGTCTGTGCCTTCTTGGTTC |
| GAPDH | GATGCTGGTG CTGAGTATGRCG | GGATCTTCATGAGGTAGTCA |