Literature DB >> 33490267

Nonanatomical Reduction of Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Patients (≤65 Years Old) with Internal Fixation Using Three Parallel Cannulated Screws.

Guanglei Zhao1, Changquan Liu1, Kangming Chen1, Jinyang Lyu1, Jie Chen1, Jingsheng Shi1, Feiyan Chen1, Yibing Wei1, Siqun Wang1, Jun Xia1, Gangyong Huang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study is aimed at investigating the association between different reduction classifications (anatomic reduction, positive buttress position reduction, and negative buttress position reduction) and two end points (complications and reoperations).
METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed 110 patients undergoing internal fixation with three parallel cannulated screws from January 2012 to January 2019 in Huashan Hospital. Based on the principles of the "Gotfried reduction," all enrolled patients were divided into three groups: anatomic reduction, positive buttress position reduction, and negative buttress position reduction intraoperatively or immediately after surgery. Clinical characteristics including age, sex, side, Garden classification, Pauwels classification, fracture level, reduction classification, Garden alignment index angles, cortical thickness index (CTI), tip-caput distance (TCD), angle of the inferior screw, and the two ending points (complications and reoperations) were included in the statistical analysis. The Mann-Whitney U-test, the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and multiple logistic regression analysis were used in the study.
RESULTS: Of the 110 patients included in our study, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age was 51.4 ± 10.4 years; 41 patients showed anatomic reduction, 35 patients showed positive buttress position reduction, and 34 patients showed negative buttress position reduction. For the outcomes, 24 patients (anatomic reduction: 6 [14.6%]; positive buttress position reduction: 5 [14.3%]; negative buttress position reduction: 13 [38.2%]) had complications, while 18 patients (anatomic reduction: 5 [12.2%]; positive buttress position reduction: 3 [8.6%]; negative buttress position reduction: 10 [29.4%]) underwent reoperations after surgery. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis of complications, negative buttress position reduction (negative buttress position reduction vs. anatomic reduction, OR = 4.309, 95%CI = 1.137 to 16.322, and p = 0.032) was found to be correlated with higher risk of complications. The same variable (negative buttress position reduction vs. anatomic reduction, OR = 5.744, 95%CI = 1.177 to 28.042, and p = 0.031) was also identified as risk factor in the multivariate logistic regression analysis of reoperations. However, no significant difference between positive reduction and anatomical reduction was investigated in the analysis of risk factors for complications, not reoperations.
CONCLUSION: Positive buttress position reduction of femoral neck fractures in young patients showed a similar incidence of complications and reoperations compared with those of anatomic reduction. For irreversible femoral neck fractures, if positive buttress position reduction has been achieved intraoperatively, it is not necessary to pursue anatomical reduction; however, negative reduction needs to be avoided.
Copyright © 2021 Guanglei Zhao et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33490267      PMCID: PMC7801101          DOI: 10.1155/2021/3069129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  31 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of different internal fixation methods for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Lin Tianye; Yang Peng; Xu Jingli; Wei QiuShi; Zhou GuangQuan; He Wei; Zhang Qingwen
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 6.529

2.  Femoral neck shortening in adult patients under the age of 55 years is associated with worse functional outcomes: Analysis of the prospective multi-center study of hip fracture outcomes in China (SHOC).

Authors:  Gerard P Slobogean; David J Stockton; Bing-Fang Zeng; Dong Wang; Baotong Ma; Andrew N Pollak
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Complications following young femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  G P Slobogean; S A Sprague; T Scott; M Bhandari
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Nonanatomical reduction of displaced subcapital femoral fractures (Gotfried reduction).

Authors:  Yechiel Gotfried; Sergey Kovalenko; Dror Fuchs
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Incidence, Magnitude, and Predictors of Shortening in Young Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  David J Stockton; Kelly A Lefaivre; Daniel E Deakin; Georg Osterhoff; Andrew Yamada; Henry M Broekhuyse; Peter J OʼBrien; Gerard P Slobogean
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  A quantitative system for staging avascular necrosis.

Authors:  M E Steinberg; G D Hayken; D R Steinberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-01

7.  Predictors of early failure of the cannulated screw system in patients, 65 years and older, with non-displaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Carlo Biz; Jacopo Tagliapietra; Filippo Zonta; Elisa Belluzzi; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Inferior calcar buttress reduction pattern for displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults: a preliminary report and an effective alternative.

Authors:  Wen-Feng Xiong; Shi-Min Chang; Ying-Qi Zhang; Sun-Jun Hu; Shou-Chao Du
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Risk of reoperation within 12 months following osteosynthesis of a displaced femoral neck fracture is linked mainly to initial fracture displacement while risk of death may be linked to bone quality: a cohort study from Danish Fracture Database.

Authors:  Anne M Nyholm; Henrik Palm; Håkon Sandholdt; Anders Troelsen; Kirill Gromov
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  A quantitative biomechanical study of positive buttress techniques for femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Bin Wang; Yong Tang; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical Outcome and Biomechanical Analysis of Dynamic Hip Screw Combined with Derotation Screw in Treating Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures Based on Different Reduction Qualities in Young Patients (≤65 Years of Age).

Authors:  Jian Zhu; Yonglong Li; Yingze Zhang; Xiaodong Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Prediction Model of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head After Femoral Neck Fracture: Machine Learning-Based Development and Validation Study.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Wei Wu; Chunxia Han; Jiaqi Zheng; Xinyu Cai; Shimin Chang; Junlong Shi; Nan Xu; Zisheng Ai
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-11-19

3.  High Charlson Comorbidity Index Score is associated with early fracture-related complication for internal fixation of neck of femur fractures.

Authors:  Ronald Man Yeung Wong; Yao Zu; Wai Wang Chau; Chi Yin Tso; Wing Hong Liu; Raymond Wai Kit Ng; Simon Kwoon Ho Chow; Wing Hoi Cheung; Ning Tang; Kevin Ki Wai Ho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A Comparative Analysis of Femoral Neck System and Three Cannulated Screws Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Six-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ya-Zhong Zhang; Yan Lin; Chao Li; Xi-Jun Yue; Gao-Yu Li; Bin Wang; Yun-Qing Wang; Zi-Qiang Zhu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Medial Buttress Plate and Allograft Bone-Assisted Cannulated Screw Fixation for Unstable Femoral Neck Fracture with Posteromedial Comminution: A Retrospective Controlled Study.

Authors:  Zhe-Yuan Huang; Yu-Hui Su; Zhi-Ping Huang; Yi-Bei Wang; Gui-Cheng Du; Yan-Peng Huang; Gang Chen; Chun Xu; Qing-An Zhu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.