Literature DB >> 33489645

Ambient observations of sub-1.0 hygroscopic growth factor and f(RH) values: Case studies from surface and airborne measurements.

Amber Ortega1, Taylor Shingler1, Ewan Crosbie2, Anna Wonaschütz3, Karl Froyd4, Ru-Shan Gao4, Joshua Schwarz4, Anne Perring4,5, Andreas Beyersdorf2, Luke Ziemba2, Jose Jimenez5,6, Pedro Campuzano Jost5,6, Armin Wisthaler7,8, Lynn Russell9, Armin Sorooshian1,10.   

Abstract

This study reports on the first set of ambient observations of sub-1.0 hygroscopicity values (i.e., growth factor, ratio of humidified-to-dry diameter, GF=D p,wet /D p,dry and f(RH), ratio of humidified-to-dry scattering coefficients, less than 1) with consistency across different instruments, regions, and platforms. We utilized data from (i) a shipboard humidified tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA) during Eastern Pacific Emitted Aerosol Cloud Experiment (E-PEACE) in 2011, (ii) multiple instruments on the DC-8 aircraft during Studies of Emissions, Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) in 2013, as well as (iii) the Differential Aerosol Sizing and Hygroscopicity Spectrometer Probe (DASH-SP) during measurement intensives during Summer 2014 and Winter 2015 in Tucson, Arizona. Sub-1.0 GFs were observed across the range of relative humidity (RH) investigated (75-95%), and did not show a RH-dependent trend in value below 1.0 or frequency of occurrence. A commonality between suppressed hygroscopicity in these experiments, including sub-1.0 GF, was the presence of smoke. Evidence of externally mixed aerosol, and thus multiple GFs, was observed during smoke periods resulting in at least one mode with GF < 1. Time periods during which the DASH-SP detected externally mixed aerosol coincide with sub-1.0 f(RH) observations. Mechanisms responsible for sub-1.0 hygroscopicity are discussed and include refractive index (RI) modifications due to aqueous processing, particle restructuring, and volatilization effects. To further investigate ambient observations of sub-1.0 GFs, f(RH), and particle restructuring, modifying hygroscopicity instruments with pre-humidification modules is recommended.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 33489645      PMCID: PMC7821680          DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos        ISSN: 2169-897X            Impact factor:   4.261


  17 in total

1.  Growth and structural change of combustion aerosols at high relative humidity.

Authors:  E Weingartner; U Baltensperger; H Burtscher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Peter F DeCarlo; Joel R Kimmel; Achim Trimborn; Megan J Northway; John T Jayne; Allison C Aiken; Marc Gonin; Katrin Fuhrer; Thomas Horvath; Kenneth S Docherty; Doug R Worsnop; Jose L Jimenez
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Measurements of volatile organic compounds in the earth's atmosphere using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Joost de Gouw; Carsten Warneke
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer.

Authors:  M R Canagaratna; J T Jayne; J L Jimenez; J D Allan; M R Alfarra; Q Zhang; T B Onasch; F Drewnick; H Coe; A Middlebrook; A Delia; L R Williams; A M Trimborn; M J Northway; P F DeCarlo; C E Kolb; P Davidovits; D R Worsnop
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.946

5.  Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing.

Authors:  Renyi Zhang; Alexei F Khalizov; Joakim Pagels; Dan Zhang; Huaxin Xue; Peter H McMurry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Changes in droplet surface tension affect the observed hygroscopicity of photochemically aged biomass burning aerosol.

Authors:  Michael R Giordano; Daniel Z Short; Seyedehsan Hosseini; William Lichtenberg; Akua A Asa-Awuku
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Soot aggregate restructuring due to coatings of secondary organic aerosol derived from aromatic precursors.

Authors:  Elijah G Schnitzler; Ashneil Dutt; André M Charbonneau; Jason S Olfert; Wolfgang Jäger
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Role of OH-initiated oxidation of isoprene in aging of combustion soot.

Authors:  Alexei F Khalizov; Yun Lin; Chong Qiu; Song Guo; Don Collins; Renyi Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Chemically-resolved volatility measurements of organic aerosol fom different sources.

Authors:  J A Huffman; K S Docherty; C Mohr; M J Cubison; I M Ulbrich; P J Ziemann; T B Onasch; J L Jimenez
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Structural Change of Aerosol Particle Aggregates with Exposure to Elevated Relative Humidity.

Authors:  James F Montgomery; Steven N Rogak; Sheldon I Green; Yuan You; Allan K Bertram
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hygroscopic and Chemical Properties of Aerosol Emissions at a Major Mining Facility in Iran: Implications for Respiratory Deposition.

Authors:  Alberto Cuevas-Robles; Naghmeh Soltani; Behnam Keshavarzi; Jong-Sang Youn; Alexander B MacDonald; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.352

2.  An annual time series of weekly size-resolved aerosol properties in the megacity of Metro Manila, Philippines.

Authors:  Connor Stahl; Melliza Templonuevo Cruz; Paola Angela Bañaga; Grace Betito; Rachel A Braun; Mojtaba Azadi Aghdam; Maria Obiminda Cambaliza; Genevieve Rose Lorenzo; Alexander B MacDonald; Preciosa Corazon Pabroa; John Robin Yee; James Bernard Simpas; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.444

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.