Literature DB >> 19708365

Chemically-resolved volatility measurements of organic aerosol fom different sources.

J A Huffman1, K S Docherty, C Mohr, M J Cubison, I M Ulbrich, P J Ziemann, T B Onasch, J L Jimenez.   

Abstract

A newly modified fast temperature-stepping thermodenuder (TD) was coupled to a High Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for rapid determination of chemically resolved volatility of organic aerosols (OA) emitted from individual sources. The TD-AMS system was used to characterize primary OA (POA) from biomass burning, trash burning surrogates (paper and plastic), and meat cooking as well as chamber-generated secondary OA (SOA) from alpha-pinene and gasoline vapor. Almost all atmospheric models represent POA as nonvolatile, with no allowance for evaporation upon heating or dilution, or condensation upon cooling. Our results indicate that all OAs observed show semivolatile behavior and that most POAs characterized here were at least as volatile as SOA measured in urban environments. Biomass-burning OA (BBOA) exhibited a wide range of volatilities, but more often showed volatility similar to urban OA. Paper-burning resembles some types of BBOA because of its relatively high volatility and intermediate atomic oxygen-to-carbon (O/C) ratio, while meat-cooking OAs (MCOA) have consistently lower volatility than ambient OA. Chamber-generated SOA under the relatively high concentrations used intraditional experiments was significantly more volatile than urban SOA, challenging extrapolation of traditional laboratory volatility measurements to the atmosphere. Most OAs sampled show increasing O/C ratio and decreasing H/C (hydrogen-to-carbon) ratio with temperature, further indicating that more oxygenated OA components are typically less volatile. Future experiments should systematically explore a wider range of mass concentrations to more fully characterize the volatility distributions of these OAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19708365     DOI: 10.1021/es803539d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  11 in total

1.  Ambient observations of sub-1.0 hygroscopic growth factor and f(RH) values: Case studies from surface and airborne measurements.

Authors:  Amber Ortega; Taylor Shingler; Ewan Crosbie; Anna Wonaschütz; Karl Froyd; Ru-Shan Gao; Joshua Schwarz; Anne Perring; Andreas Beyersdorf; Luke Ziemba; Jose Jimenez; Pedro Campuzano Jost; Armin Wisthaler; Lynn Russell; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.261

2.  Evaporation kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic aerosol.

Authors:  Timothy D Vaden; Dan Imre; Josef Beránek; Manish Shrivastava; Alla Zelenyuk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning.

Authors:  Benjamin N Murphy; Matthew C Woody; Jose L Jimenez; Ann Marie G Carlton; Patrick L Hayes; Shang Liu; Nga L Ng; Lynn M Russell; Ari Setyan; Lu Xu; Jeff Young; Rahul A Zaveri; Qi Zhang; Havala O T Pye
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

4.  Trends in the oxidation and relative volatility of chamber-generated secondary organic aerosol.

Authors:  Kenneth S Docherty; Eric W Corse; Mohammed Jaoui; John H Offenberg; Tadeusz E Kleindienst; Jonathan D Krug; Theran P Riedel; Michael Lewandowski
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 5.  Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Jose L Jimenez; Manjula R Canagaratna; Ingrid M Ulbrich; Nga L Ng; Douglas R Worsnop; Yele Sun
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Response of an aerosol mass spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfates and implications for atmospheric chemistry.

Authors:  D K Farmer; A Matsunaga; K S Docherty; J D Surratt; J H Seinfeld; P J Ziemann; J L Jimenez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Changes to the chemical composition of soot from heterogeneous oxidation reactions.

Authors:  Eleanor C Browne; Jonathan P Franklin; Manjula R Canagaratna; Paola Massoli; Thomas W Kirchstetter; Douglas R Worsnop; Kevin R Wilson; Jesse H Kroll
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation from volatile chemical products.

Authors:  Elyse A Pennington; Karl M Seltzer; Benjamin N Murphy; Momei Qin; John H Seinfeld; Havala O T Pye
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.133

9.  Toward understanding amines and their degradation products from postcombustion CO2 capture processes with aerosol mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xinlei Ge; Stephanie L Shaw; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Quantifying the effect of organic aerosol aging and intermediate-volatility emissions on regional-scale aerosol pollution in China.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; Shuxiao Wang; Neil M Donahue; Shantanu H Jathar; Xiaofeng Huang; Wenjing Wu; Jiming Hao; Allen L Robinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.