Literature DB >> 33489287

Uncertainty in and around biophysical modelling: insights from interdisciplinary research on agricultural digitalization.

M Espig1, S C Finlay-Smits1, E D Meenken1, D M Wheeler2, M Sharifi1.   

Abstract

Agricultural digitalization is providing growing amounts of real-time digital data. Biophysical simulation models can help interpret these data. However, these models are subject to complex uncertainties, which has prompted calls for interdisciplinary research to better understand and communicate modelling uncertainties and their impact on decision-making. This article develops two corresponding insights from an interdisciplinary project in a New Zealand agricultural research organization. First, we expand on a recent Royal Society Open Science journal article (van der Bles et al. 2019 Royal Society Open Science 6, 181870 (doi:10.1098/rsos.181870)) and suggest a threefold conceptual framework to describe direct, indirect and contextual uncertainties associated with biophysical models. Second, we reflect on the process of developing this framework to highlight challenges to successful collaboration and the importance of a deeper engagement with interdisciplinarity. This includes resolving often unequal disciplinary standings and the need for early collaborative problem framing. We propose that both insights are complementary and informative to researchers and practitioners in the field of modelling uncertainty as well as to those interested in interdisciplinary environmental research generally. The article concludes by outlining limitations of interdisciplinary research and a shift towards transdisciplinarity that also includes non-scientists. Such a shift is crucial to holistically address uncertainties associated with biophysical modelling and to realize the full potential of agricultural digitalization.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biophysical modelling; engineering; interdisciplinary research; social science; statistics; uncertainty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489287      PMCID: PMC7813261          DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  R Soc Open Sci        ISSN: 2054-5703            Impact factor:   2.963


  15 in total

1.  [Review of: Evelyn Fox Keller, Making sense of life: explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002].

Authors:  Michael Ruse
Journal:  Ann Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.565

2.  Explanatory pluralism in the medical sciences: theory and practice.

Authors:  Leen De Vreese; Erik Weber; Jeroen Van Bouwel
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2010-10

3.  More is not always better: coping with ambiguity in natural resources management.

Authors:  M Brugnach; A Dewulf; H J Henriksen; P van der Keur
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences.

Authors:  N Oreskes; K Shrader-Frechette; K Belitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Elinor Ostrom
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Linguistic uncertainty in qualitative risk analysis and how to minimize it.

Authors:  Janet M Carey; Mark A Burgman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Revisiting the Relationship Between Data, Models, and Decision-Making.

Authors:  Ty P A Ferré
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Big data uncertainties.

Authors:  Pierre-André G Maugis
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 1.614

9.  Communicating scientific uncertainty.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff; Alex L Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science.

Authors:  Anne Marthe van der Bles; Sander van der Linden; Alexandra L J Freeman; James Mitchell; Ana B Galvao; Lisa Zaval; David J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.