Literature DB >> 28793174

Revisiting the Relationship Between Data, Models, and Decision-Making.

Ty P A Ferré1.   

Abstract

We hydrologists can do a better job of supporting water-resources decision-making. I will argue that we can do this by recognizing that decision makers use qualitative, multiple-narrative approaches. So, rather than providing single-model predictions with quantitative uncertainties, we should develop teams of rival models that inform decision makers about what is known, what is possible, and what is unknown. This requires that we build ensembles of models that include biased, advocacy models that directly represent stakeholders' interests or concerns. From this inclusive platform, we can speak objectively and clearly about the risks that drive stakeholders' decisions. Furthermore, we will be promoting more appropriate use of the scientific method in making informed water-resources decisions.
© 2017, National Ground Water Association.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28793174     DOI: 10.1111/gwat.12574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  2 in total

1.  Decision Support Modeling: Data Assimilation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Strategic Abstraction.

Authors:  John Doherty; Catherine Moore
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Uncertainty in and around biophysical modelling: insights from interdisciplinary research on agricultural digitalization.

Authors:  M Espig; S C Finlay-Smits; E D Meenken; D M Wheeler; M Sharifi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.963

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.