Literature DB >> 33489102

GLIMPSE: a glioblastoma prognostication model using ensemble learning-a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study.

Kamel A Samara1, Zaher Al Aghbari2, Amani Abusafia3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma is one of the most common and aggressive brain tumors in the world with a poor prognosis. A glioblastoma prognostication model has the potential to improve the cancer's standard of care. No other paper has looked at using ensemble learning with a population database to predict multiple binary glioblastoma survival outcomes.
METHODS: We utilized ensemble learning to design, build, and test a prognostication system for glioblastoma for short-, intermediate- and long-term survival, based on various clinical features. We used the population database SEER which covers 17 different registries. The most important prognostic features were identified and used as a clinical feature set. The statistical feature set was determined using Random Forests. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were reported.
RESULTS: Statistically-determined feature sets had the best performance. All the top models for short, intermediate, and long-term survival were random forests. With regards to short-term survival, top model had metrics AUROC = 0.937, accuracy = 86%, specificity = 88%, sensitivity = 85%, NPV = 85%, and PPV = 87%. For long-term survival, the top model had AUROC = 0.893, accuracy = 81%, specificity = 79%, sensitivity = 83%, NPV = 82%, and PPV = 79%. The top intermediate-term survival prediction had AUROC ≥ 0.780 and the other metrics were at least 70%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our ensemble models were high-performing and achieved AUROCs as high as 0.94, highlighting the importance of balancing, using ensemble techniques and statistical feature selection. Our models can potentially be used by clinicians after external validation. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensemble learning; Feature selection; Glioblastoma; Machine learning; Prognosis; SEER; Survival prediction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33489102      PMCID: PMC7803850          DOI: 10.1007/s13755-020-00134-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst        ISSN: 2047-2501


  42 in total

1.  Radiogenomics of Glioblastoma: Machine Learning-based Classification of Molecular Characteristics by Using Multiparametric and Multiregional MR Imaging Features.

Authors:  Philipp Kickingereder; David Bonekamp; Martha Nowosielski; Annekathrin Kratz; Martin Sill; Sina Burth; Antje Wick; Oliver Eidel; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch; Jürgen Debus; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; David Jones; Stefan Pfister; Wolfgang Wick; Andreas von Deimling; Martin Bendszus; David Capper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  A comprehensive data level analysis for cancer diagnosis on imbalanced data.

Authors:  Sara Fotouhi; Shahrokh Asadi; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  The effect of race on the prognosis of the glioblastoma patient: a brief review.

Authors:  Nitesh P Patel; Kristopher A Lyon; Jason H Huang
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 4.  Glioblastoma: Overview of Disease and Treatment.

Authors:  Mary Elizabeth Davis
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.027

Review 5.  Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jigisha P Thakkar; Therese A Dolecek; Craig Horbinski; Quinn T Ostrom; Donita D Lightner; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; John L Villano
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Geographic Variations in the Incidence of Glioblastoma and Prognostic Factors Predictive of Overall Survival in US Adults from 2004-2013.

Authors:  Hao Xu; Junrui Chen; Hongzhi Xu; Zhiyong Qin
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  The association between race and survival in glioblastoma patients in the US: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andrew Bohn; Alexander Braley; Pura Rodriguez de la Vega; Juan Carlos Zevallos; Noël C Barengo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  SMOTE for high-dimensional class-imbalanced data.

Authors:  Rok Blagus; Lara Lusa
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Glioblastoma multiforme: State of the art and future therapeutics.

Authors:  Taylor A Wilson; Matthias A Karajannis; David H Harter
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-05-08

Review 10.  Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction.

Authors:  Konstantina Kourou; Themis P Exarchos; Konstantinos P Exarchos; Michalis V Karamouzis; Dimitrios I Fotiadis
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.271

View more
  1 in total

1.  AI and High-Grade Glioma for Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction: Do All Machine Learning Models Perform Equally Well?

Authors:  Luca Pasquini; Antonio Napolitano; Martina Lucignani; Emanuela Tagliente; Francesco Dellepiane; Maria Camilla Rossi-Espagnet; Matteo Ritrovato; Antonello Vidiri; Veronica Villani; Giulio Ranazzi; Antonella Stoppacciaro; Andrea Romano; Alberto Di Napoli; Alessandro Bozzao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.