Literature DB >> 33489075

Unresolvable Pixels Contribute to Character Legibility: Another Reason Why High-Resolution Images Appear Clearer.

Madoka Ohnishi1, Koichi Oda1.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of character sample density on legibility. As the spatial frequency component important for character recognition is said to be 1 to 3 cycles/letter (cpl), six dots in each direction should be sufficient to represent a character; however, some studies have reported that high-density characters are more legible. Considering that these seemingly contradictory findings could be compatible, we analyzed the frequency component of the character stimulus with adjusted sample density and found that the component content of 1 to 3 cpl increased in the high-density character. In the following three psychophysical experiments, high sample density characters tended to have lower contrast thresholds, both for normal and low vision. Furthermore, the contrast threshold with characters of each sample density was predicted from the amplitude of the 1 to 3 cpl component. Thus, while increasing the sample density improves legibility, adding a high frequency is not important in itself. The findings suggest that enhancing the frequency components important for recognizing characters by adding the high-frequency component contributes to making characters more legible.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  character; critical band; high resolution; legibility; letter; low vision; sample density; spatial frequency

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489075      PMCID: PMC7768324          DOI: 10.1177/2041669520981102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iperception        ISSN: 2041-6695


  22 in total

1.  The filtered Fourier difference spectrum predicts psychophysical letter discrimination in the peripheral retina.

Authors:  Roger S Anderson; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004

2.  Vanishing Optotype acuity: repeatability and effect of the number of alternatives.

Authors:  Nilpa Shah; Steven C Dakin; Tony Redmond; Roger S Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Features for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters.

Authors:  Daniel Fiset; Caroline Blais; Catherine Ethier-Majcher; Martin Arguin; Daniel Bub; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

4.  Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties.

Authors:  M A García-Pérez
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings.

Authors:  F W Campbell; J G Robson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The appearance of gratings with and without the fundamental Fourier component.

Authors:  F W Campbell; E R Howell; J G Robson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The visual filter mediating letter identification.

Authors:  J A Solomon; D G Pelli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Psychophysics of reading--I. Normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; D G Pelli; G S Rubin; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Spatial-frequency requirements for reading revisited.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification.

Authors:  Ipek Oruç; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.