Molly Wade-Cummings1, Jonathan F Mailman2, Michelle L Degelman3, Casey Phillips4, Jason R Vanstone5. 1. , BSc, is with the College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 2. , BSc(Pharm), ACPR, PharmD, CD, is with the Department of Pharmacy Services, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, and the College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 3. , MSc, is with Stewardship and Clinical Appropriateness, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan. 4. , BSP, PharmD, is with the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan. 5. , PhD, is with Stewardship and Clinical Appropriateness, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As one of the most common bloodstream infections worldwide, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia places a major burden on health care. Implementation of a rapid, genetic-based diagnostic test may have important implications in the clinical management of patients with S. aureus bacteremia. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess concordance between testing based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the current gold standard, culture and sensitivity testing; the secondary objective was to assess the impact of this technology on patient care. METHODS: A pre-post intervention retrospective chart review was used to document the hospital course of patients with a diagnosis of S. aureus bacteremia before and after implementation of the PCR-based diagnostic system. Laboratory results from all patient samples subjected to PCR-based analysis following implementation of this system were compared with culture and sensitivity data for the same samples to determine accuracy of the new system. In addition, time to optimal therapy for each patient was calculated as the interval between the initiation of empiric and terminal therapies. The appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment was characterized as guideline-concordant, nonconcordant with the guidelines, or nonconcordant yet still clinically appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 98 and 99 patients met the inclusion criteria before and after implementation of the PCR-based diagnostic system, respectively. PCR-based results displayed 99.8% concordance (440/441 total samples) with results from culture and sensitivity testing. The time to optimal therapy was significantly shorter after implementation, by a mean of 22.8 h (p < 0.001). Overall, 97% of empiric and 99% of terminal antimicrobial regimens were either guideline-concordant or clinically appropriate for treatment of S. aureus bacteremia; 3% of empiric and 1% of terminal antimicrobial regimens were nonconcordant with clinical guidelines without any explanation based on other clinical considerations. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings support the utility of using a direct-from-positive-blood-culture PCR-based diagnostic tool as the primary method of identifying S. aureus bacteremia in patients, as well as the acceptance of and acting upon the new assay's results by our local clinicians. PCR-based assays can help reduce the time to optimal terminal therapy for patients with bacteremia. 2021 Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists. All content in the Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy is copyrighted by the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacy. In submitting their manuscripts, the authors transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership to CSHP.
BACKGROUND: As one of the most common bloodstream infections worldwide, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia places a major burden on health care. Implementation of a rapid, genetic-based diagnostic test may have important implications in the clinical management of patients with S. aureus bacteremia. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess concordance between testing based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the current gold standard, culture and sensitivity testing; the secondary objective was to assess the impact of this technology on patient care. METHODS: A pre-post intervention retrospective chart review was used to document the hospital course of patients with a diagnosis of S. aureus bacteremia before and after implementation of the PCR-based diagnostic system. Laboratory results from all patient samples subjected to PCR-based analysis following implementation of this system were compared with culture and sensitivity data for the same samples to determine accuracy of the new system. In addition, time to optimal therapy for each patient was calculated as the interval between the initiation of empiric and terminal therapies. The appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment was characterized as guideline-concordant, nonconcordant with the guidelines, or nonconcordant yet still clinically appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 98 and 99 patients met the inclusion criteria before and after implementation of the PCR-based diagnostic system, respectively. PCR-based results displayed 99.8% concordance (440/441 total samples) with results from culture and sensitivity testing. The time to optimal therapy was significantly shorter after implementation, by a mean of 22.8 h (p < 0.001). Overall, 97% of empiric and 99% of terminal antimicrobial regimens were either guideline-concordant or clinically appropriate for treatment of S. aureus bacteremia; 3% of empiric and 1% of terminal antimicrobial regimens were nonconcordant with clinical guidelines without any explanation based on other clinical considerations. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings support the utility of using a direct-from-positive-blood-culture PCR-based diagnostic tool as the primary method of identifying S. aureus bacteremia in patients, as well as the acceptance of and acting upon the new assay's results by our local clinicians. PCR-based assays can help reduce the time to optimal terminal therapy for patients with bacteremia. 2021 Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists. All content in the Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy is copyrighted by the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacy. In submitting their manuscripts, the authors transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership to CSHP.
Entities:
Keywords:
GeneXpert; antimicrobial stewardship; bacteremia; bactériémie; diagnostic testing; gestion de l’utilisation des antimicrobiens; polymerase chain reaction; réaction en chaîne par polymérase; test de diagnostic
Authors: Angela S Rossney; Celine M Herra; Gráinne I Brennan; Pamela M Morgan; Brian O'Connell Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Brenda L Minor; Veida Elliott; Michelle Fernandez; Lindsay O'Neal; Laura McLeod; Giovanni Delacqua; Francesco Delacqua; Jacqueline Kirby; Stephany N Duda Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Steven Y C Tong; Joshua S Davis; Emily Eichenberger; Thomas L Holland; Vance G Fowler Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 26.132