Alexander Mahnert1, Cyprien Verseux2, Petra Schwendner3, Kaisa Koskinen1,4, Christina Kumpitsch1, Marcus Blohs1, Lisa Wink1, Daniela Brunner1, Theodora Goessler1, Daniela Billi5, Christine Moissl-Eichinger6,7. 1. Interactive Microbiome Research, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8010, Graz, Austria. 2. Laboratory of Applied Space Microbiology, Center of Applied Space Technology and Microgravity (ZARM), University of Bremen, Am Fallturm 2, 28359, Bremen, Germany. 3. University of Florida, Space Life Sciences Lab, 505 Odyssey Way, Exploration Park, N. Merritt Island, FL, 32953, USA. 4. BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria. 5. Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica s.n.c, 00133, Rome, Italy. 6. Interactive Microbiome Research, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8010, Graz, Austria. christine.moissl-eichinger@medunigraz.at. 7. BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria. christine.moissl-eichinger@medunigraz.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human health is closely interconnected with its microbiome. Resilient microbiomes in, on, and around the human body will be key for safe and successful long-term space travel. However, longitudinal dynamics of microbiomes inside confined built environments are still poorly understood. Herein, we used the Hawaii Space Exploration Analog and Simulation IV (HI-SEAS IV) mission, a 1 year-long isolation study, to investigate microbial transfer between crew and habitat, in order to understand adverse developments which may occur in a future outpost on the Moon or Mars. RESULTS: Longitudinal 16S rRNA gene profiles, as well as quantitative observations, revealed significant differences in microbial diversity, abundance, and composition between samples of the built environment and its crew. The microbiome composition and diversity associated with abiotic surfaces was found to be rather stable, whereas the microbial skin profiles of individual crew members were highly dynamic, resulting in an increased microbiome diversity at the end of the isolation period. The skin microbiome dynamics were especially pronounced by a regular transfer of the indicator species Methanobrevibacter between crew members within the first 200 days. Quantitative information was used to track the propagation of antimicrobial resistance in the habitat. Together with functional and phenotypic predictions, quantitative and qualitative data supported the observation of a delayed longitudinal microbial homogenization between crew and habitat surfaces which was mainly caused by a malfunctioning sanitary facility. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights main routes of microbial transfer, interaction of the crew, and origins of microbial dynamics in an isolated environment. We identify key targets of microbial monitoring, and emphasize the need for defined baselines of microbiome diversity and abundance on surfaces and crew skin. Targeted manipulation to counteract adverse developments of the microbiome could be a highly important strategy to ensure safety during future space endeavors. Video abstract.
BACKGROUND:Human health is closely interconnected with its microbiome. Resilient microbiomes in, on, and around the human body will be key for safe and successful long-term space travel. However, longitudinal dynamics of microbiomes inside confined built environments are still poorly understood. Herein, we used the Hawaii Space Exploration Analog and Simulation IV (HI-SEAS IV) mission, a 1 year-long isolation study, to investigate microbial transfer between crew and habitat, in order to understand adverse developments which may occur in a future outpost on the Moon or Mars. RESULTS: Longitudinal 16S rRNA gene profiles, as well as quantitative observations, revealed significant differences in microbial diversity, abundance, and composition between samples of the built environment and its crew. The microbiome composition and diversity associated with abiotic surfaces was found to be rather stable, whereas the microbial skin profiles of individual crew members were highly dynamic, resulting in an increased microbiome diversity at the end of the isolation period. The skin microbiome dynamics were especially pronounced by a regular transfer of the indicator species Methanobrevibacter between crew members within the first 200 days. Quantitative information was used to track the propagation of antimicrobial resistance in the habitat. Together with functional and phenotypic predictions, quantitative and qualitative data supported the observation of a delayed longitudinal microbial homogenization between crew and habitat surfaces which was mainly caused by a malfunctioning sanitary facility. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights main routes of microbial transfer, interaction of the crew, and origins of microbial dynamics in an isolated environment. We identify key targets of microbial monitoring, and emphasize the need for defined baselines of microbiome diversity and abundance on surfaces and crew skin. Targeted manipulation to counteract adverse developments of the microbiome could be a highly important strategy to ensure safety during future space endeavors. Video abstract.
Authors: Evan Bolyen; Jai Ram Rideout; Matthew R Dillon; Nicholas A Bokulich; Christian C Abnet; Gabriel A Al-Ghalith; Harriet Alexander; Eric J Alm; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Francesco Asnicar; Yang Bai; Jordan E Bisanz; Kyle Bittinger; Asker Brejnrod; Colin J Brislawn; C Titus Brown; Benjamin J Callahan; Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodríguez; John Chase; Emily K Cope; Ricardo Da Silva; Christian Diener; Pieter C Dorrestein; Gavin M Douglas; Daniel M Durall; Claire Duvallet; Christian F Edwardson; Madeleine Ernst; Mehrbod Estaki; Jennifer Fouquier; Julia M Gauglitz; Sean M Gibbons; Deanna L Gibson; Antonio Gonzalez; Kestrel Gorlick; Jiarong Guo; Benjamin Hillmann; Susan Holmes; Hannes Holste; Curtis Huttenhower; Gavin A Huttley; Stefan Janssen; Alan K Jarmusch; Lingjing Jiang; Benjamin D Kaehler; Kyo Bin Kang; Christopher R Keefe; Paul Keim; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Irina Koester; Tomasz Kosciolek; Jorden Kreps; Morgan G I Langille; Joslynn Lee; Ruth Ley; Yong-Xin Liu; Erikka Loftfield; Catherine Lozupone; Massoud Maher; Clarisse Marotz; Bryan D Martin; Daniel McDonald; Lauren J McIver; Alexey V Melnik; Jessica L Metcalf; Sydney C Morgan; Jamie T Morton; Ahmad Turan Naimey; Jose A Navas-Molina; Louis Felix Nothias; Stephanie B Orchanian; Talima Pearson; Samuel L Peoples; Daniel Petras; Mary Lai Preuss; Elmar Pruesse; Lasse Buur Rasmussen; Adam Rivers; Michael S Robeson; Patrick Rosenthal; Nicola Segata; Michael Shaffer; Arron Shiffer; Rashmi Sinha; Se Jin Song; John R Spear; Austin D Swafford; Luke R Thompson; Pedro J Torres; Pauline Trinh; Anupriya Tripathi; Peter J Turnbaugh; Sabah Ul-Hasan; Justin J J van der Hooft; Fernando Vargas; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Emily Vogtmann; Max von Hippel; William Walters; Yunhu Wan; Mingxun Wang; Jonathan Warren; Kyle C Weber; Charles H D Williamson; Amy D Willis; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Jesse R Zaneveld; Yilong Zhang; Qiyun Zhu; Rob Knight; J Gregory Caporaso Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Eric A Franzosa; Katherine Huang; James F Meadow; Dirk Gevers; Katherine P Lemon; Brendan J M Bohannan; Curtis Huttenhower Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elizabeth A Grice; Heidi H Kong; Sean Conlan; Clayton B Deming; Joie Davis; Alice C Young; Gerard G Bouffard; Robert W Blakesley; Patrick R Murray; Eric D Green; Maria L Turner; Julia A Segre Journal: Science Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: James T Morton; Jon Sanders; Robert A Quinn; Daniel McDonald; Antonio Gonzalez; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Jose A Navas-Molina; Se Jin Song; Jessica L Metcalf; Embriette R Hyde; Manuel Lladser; Pieter C Dorrestein; Rob Knight Journal: mSystems Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 6.496
Authors: Simon Lax; Daniel P Smith; Jarrad Hampton-Marcell; Sarah M Owens; Kim M Handley; Nicole M Scott; Sean M Gibbons; Peter Larsen; Benjamin D Shogan; Sophie Weiss; Jessica L Metcalf; Luke K Ursell; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Will Van Treuren; Nur A Hasan; Molly K Gibson; Rita Colwell; Gautam Dantas; Rob Knight; Jack A Gilbert Journal: Science Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Aleksandra Checinska; Alexander J Probst; Parag Vaishampayan; James R White; Deepika Kumar; Victor G Stepanov; George E Fox; Henrik R Nilsson; Duane L Pierson; Jay Perry; Kasthuri Venkateswaran Journal: Microbiome Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: C Urbaniak; A Checinska Sielaff; K G Frey; J E Allen; N Singh; C Jaing; K Wheeler; K Venkateswaran Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 4.379