| Literature DB >> 33486889 |
Miguel Barroso-Gil1, Eric Olinger1, Simon A Ramsbottom1, Elisa Molinari1, Colin G Miles1, John A Sayer1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mutations in ciliary genes cause a spectrum of both overlapping and distinct clinical syndromes (ciliopathies). CEP120 and CC2D2A are paradigmatic examples for this genetic heterogeneity and pleiotropy as mutations in both cause Joubert syndrome but are also associated with skeletal ciliopathies and Meckel syndrome, respectively. The molecular basis for this phenotypical variability is not understood but basal exon skipping likely contributes to tolerance for deleterious mutations via tissue-specific preservation of the amount of expressed functional protein.Entities:
Keywords: CC2D2A; CEP120; Joubert syndrome; Meckel syndrome; antisense oligonucleotide; ciliopathy; exon skipping; precision medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33486889 PMCID: PMC8683696 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.473
Patients with biallelic CEP120 variants and associated phenotypes (ranked by publication)
| Family ID | Patient ID | Phenotype | Kidney phenotype (1) | Allele 1 (Ex,Int) | Allele 2 (Ex,Int) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Family 1_II:2 | JATD (2) | n/a | c.595G>C; p.(Ala199Pro) (Ex6) | c.595G>C; p.(Ala199Pro) (Ex6) | Shaheen et al. ( |
| 2 | Family 2_II:4 | JATD (2) | n/a | c.595G>C; p.(Ala199Pro) (Ex6) | c.595G>C; p.(Ala199Pro) (Ex6) | Shaheen et al. ( |
| 3 | Family 3_II:1 | JATD (2) | yes | c.595G>C; p.(Ala199Pro) (Ex6) | c.595G>C; p.(Ala199Pro) (Ex6) | Shaheen et al. ( |
| 4 | COR391 | JBTS | no | c.581T>C; p.(Val194Ala) (Ex6) | c.581T>C; p.(Val194Ala) (Ex6) | Roosing et al. ( |
| 5 | MTI‐143 | JBTS | no (3) | c.2177T>C; p.(Leu726Pro) (Ex16) | c.2134C>T; p.(Leu712Phe) (Ex16) | Roosing et al. ( |
| 6 | MTI‐991 | JBTS | no | c.49+5_49+10del; p.(Gly+1AspfsTer14) (Int2) | c.49+5_49+10del; p.(Gly+1AspfsTer14) (Int2) | Roosing et al. ( |
| 7 | MTI‐1516 | JBTS | no | c.1138_1139insA; p.(Ser380TyrfsTer19) (Ex9) | c.1646C>T; p.(Ala549Val) (Ex12) | Roosing et al. ( |
| 8 | MKS‐2930 | MKS/OFD | yes | c.2924T>G; p.(Ile975Ser) (Ex21) | c.2924T>G; p.(Ile975Ser) (Ex21) | Roosing et al. ( |
| 9 | SW‐476410 | TCDOE | no | c.451C>T; p.(Arg151Ter) (Ex5) | c.595G>C; p.(Ala199Pro) (Ex6) | Roosing et al. ( |
CEP120 transcript: NM_153223.3. JATD, Jeune asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy; JBTS, Joubert syndrome; MKS, Meckel syndrome; OFD, oro‐facial‐digital syndrome; TCDOE, tectocerebellar dysraphia with occipital encephalocele. (1) Designated as n/a, unless renal phenotype clearly stated. (2) A fourth JATD case was described (Shaheen et al., 2015), however DNA from the proband was not available. Both parents presented the CEP120: p.(Ala199Pro) variant in heterozygosis. (3) For this patient Roosing et al. (Roosing et al., 2016) reported grade II‐III hydronephrosis detected at birth that spontaneously resolved after few months. No kidney problems have been reported since then.
Patients with truncating CC2D2A variants in potentially skippable exons and associated phenotypes (ranked by publication)
| Family ID (1) | Patient ID | Phenotype | Kidney phenotype (2) | Allele 1 (Ex,Int) | Allele 2 (Ex,Int) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | UW41‐IV:1 | JBTS | no | c.2848C>T; p.(Arg950Ter) (Ex23) | c.2848C>T; p.(Arg950Ter) (Ex23) | Gorden et al. ( |
| 16 | UW47‐II:1 | JBTS | no | c.3055C>T; p.(Arg1019Ter) (Ex25) | c.3288G>C; p.(Gln1096His) (Ex26) | Gorden et al. ( |
| 20 | UM10 | MKS | n/a | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | c.4179+1del (Int33) | Tallila et al. ( |
| 26 | MKS‐54 | MKS | yes | c.517C>T; p.(Arg173Ter) (Ex8) | c.517C>T; p.(Arg173Ter) (Ex8) | Mougou‐Zerelli et al. ( |
| 29 | MKS‐977 | MKS | yes | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | Mougou‐Zerelli et al. ( |
| 33 | MKS‐365 | MKS | yes | c.2773C>T; p.(Arg925Ter) (Ex22) (3) | c.2486+1G>C (Int20) | Mougou‐Zerelli et al. ( |
| 34 | UW67 | JBTS | yes | c.3347C>T; p.(Thr1116Met) (Ex27) | c.3145C>T; p.(Arg1049Ter) (Ex25) | Doherty et al. ( |
| 35 | F434‐21 | JBTS | no | c.517C>T; p.(Arg173Ter) (Ex8) | c.1676T>C; p.(Leu559Pro) (Ex16) | Otto et al. ( |
| 36 | A2421‐21 | MKS | yes | c.3544T>C; p.(Trp1182Arg) (Ex29) | c.3774dup; p.(Glu1259Ter) (Ex31) | Otto et al. ( |
| 38 | M506 | MKS | n/a | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | Hopp et al. ( |
| 40 | UW75‐3 | JBTS | no | c.1676T>C; p.(Leu559Pro) (Ex16) | c.3892_3893del; p.(Val1298PhefsTer17) (Ex31) | Bachmann‐Gagescu et al. ( |
| 42 | UW78‐3 | JBTS | n/a | c.3055C>T; p.(Arg1019Ter) (Ex25) | c.4667A>T; p.(Asp1556Val) (Ex37) | Bachmann‐Gagescu et al. ( |
| 43 | UW79‐3 | JBTS | no | c.1263_1264insGGCATGTTTTGGC; p.(Ser422GlyfsTer19) (Ex13) (4) | c.3452T>C; p.(Val1151Ala) (Ex28) | Bachmann‐Gagescu et al. ( |
| 43 | UW79‐4 | JBTS | no | c.1263_1264insGGCATGTTTTGGC; p.(Ser422GlyfsTer19) (Ex13) (4) | c.3452T>C; p.(Val1151Ala) (Ex28) | Bachmann‐Gagescu et al. ( |
| 51 | 128 | MKS | n/a | c.3544T>C; p.(Trp1182Arg) (Ex29) | c.3774dup; p.(Glu1259Ter) (Ex31) | Szymanska et al. ( |
| 61 | MKS | yes | c.3774dup; p.(Glu1259Ter) (Ex31) | c.4550C>G; p.(Thr1517Ser) (Ex37) | Jones et al. ( | |
| 62 | MTI‐127 | JBTS (5) | n/a | c.4583G>A; p.(Arg1528His) (Ex37) (6) | c.3082del; p.(Arg1028GlyfsTer4) (Ex25) (7) | Ben‐Salem et al. ( |
| 72 | 3 | JBTS/MKS (8) | n/a | c.2803C>T; p.(Arg935Ter) (Ex22) | c.3774dup; p.(Glu1259Ter) (Ex31) | Watson et al. ( |
| 73 | 4 | JBTS/MKS (8) | n/a | c.2875del; p.(Glu959AsnfsTer3) (Ex23) | c.2875del; p.(Glu959AsnfsTer3) (Ex23) | Watson et al. ( |
| 74 | FT‐1 | MKS | yes | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | Al‐Hamed et al. ( |
| 78 | FT‐15 | MKS | yes | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | Al‐Hamed et al. ( |
| 79 | FT‐21 | MKS | yes | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | c.3084del; p.(Lys1029ArgfsTer3) (Ex25) | Al‐Hamed et al. ( |
| 81 | F850‐21 | Cogan | yes | c.1267C>T; p.(Arg423Ter) (Ex13) | c.4667A>T; p.(Asp1556Val) (Ex37) | Schueler et al. ( |
| 84 | JBTS | yes | c.2581G>A; p.(Asp861Asn) (Ex21) | c.2848C>T; p.(Arg950Ter) (Ex23) | Xiao et al. ( | |
| 89 | 44:36 | JBTS | no | c.3744_3747dup; p.(Pro1250GlyfsTer11) (Ex30) (9) | c.3989G>A; p.(Arg1330Gln) (Ex32) | Vilboux et al. ( |
| 89 | 45:36 | JBTS | no | c.3744_3747dup; p.(Pro1250GlyfsTer11) (Ex30) (9) | c.3989G>A; p.(Arg1330Gln) (Ex32) | Vilboux et al. ( |
CC2D2A transcript: NM_001080522.2. Cogan, Cogan‐type congenital oculomotor apraxia; JBTS, Joubert syndrome; MKS, Meckel syndrome; ML, Meckel‐like syndrome. (1) Relates to family ID of complete database in Table S3. (2) Designated as n/a, unless renal phenotype clearly stated. (3) Variant initially reported as c.2673C>T; p.(Arg925Ter). We assumed c.2773C>T is the correct nucleotide change given that it is predicted to give rise to the reported protein change. (4) Variant initially reported as c.1263_4InsGGCATGTTTTGGC; c.1268G>A; p.(Ser423Glyfs*19). (5) Study does not state potential extra‐CNS manifestations. (6) Variant initially reported as c.4258G>A; p.(Arg1528His). This variant was corrected as c.4583G>A; p.(Arg1528His) (Lam et al., 2020). (7) Variant initially reported as c.1412delG; p.(Lys472Argfs*). This variant was corrected as c.3082del; p.(Arg1028Glyfs*4) (Ben‐Salem et al., 2015). (8) In this study (Watson et al., 2016), patients were referred with a clinical diagnosis of either JBTS (9 patients) or MKS (17 patients). The genetic diagnosis was confirmed in 14 of the 26 cases, a diagnostic yield of 54%. The exact phenotype is not reported. (9) Variant initially reported as c.3743_3746dup; p.(Pro1250Glyfs*11).
FIGURE 1Phenotypes and genotypes in patients carrying biallelic CC2D2A variants. (a) Distribution of phenotypes associated with CC2D2A biallelic variants in reported patients. n indicates total number of patients. ASD, autism spectrum disorder; Cogan, Cogan‐type congenital oculomotor apraxia; JBTS, Joubert syndrome; MKS, Meckel syndrome; ML, Meckel‐like syndrome; RCD, rod cone dystrophy; ?, not unequivocally described. (b) Distribution of CC2D2A variant consequences detected in index patients. n indicates total number of alleles. Of note, in one family three different variants were reported with two different compound heterozygote combinations (see Table S3). AAdel, single amino acid deletion; Large ins/del, large insertions/deletion including retrotransposon insertion. (c) Distribution of CC2D2A allelic status detected in patients with Meckel syndrome or Meckel‐like syndrome. (d) Distribution of CC2D2A allelic status detected in patients with Joubert syndrome. (e) Distribution of CC2D2A allelic status detected in patients with kidney disease. (f) Distribution of CC2D2A allelic status detected in patients without kidney disease. Truncating indicates either a nonsense or a frameshift variant
FIGURE 2Exon usage and tissue specific transcript expression of CEP120 and CC2D2A. (a(i)). CEP120 predicted protein coding transcript isoforms with highest expression levels in kidney medulla (red) und cerebellar hemisphere (blue) based on RNA sequencing data from the Genotype‐Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project. (a(ii)) CEP120 genomic localization, the different exons detected in GTEx data with the different imputed splice junctions and the three transcripts detected at highest levels in kidney medulla and cerebellar hemisphere. Exons are labelled with respect to transcript ENST00000328236.9. The open reading frame is shown in dark grey with the start codon marked with an arrowhead. (a(iii)) Predicted protein products from the three analysed transcripts. (b(i)) CC2D2A predicted protein coding transcript isoforms with highest expression levels in kidney medulla (red) and cerebellar hemisphere (blue) based on RNA sequencing data from the Genotype‐Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project. (b(ii)) CC2D2A genomic localization, the different exons detected in GTEx data with the different imputed splice junctions and the three transcripts detected at highest levels in kidney medulla and cerebellar hemisphere. Exons are labelled with respect to transcript ENST00000503292.5. The open reading frame is shown in dark grey with the start codon marked with an arrowhead. Junction reads enriched in the kidney medulla (compared to cerebellum) are marked in red and junction reads enriched in the cerebellum (compared to kidney) are marked in blue. (b(iii)) Predicted protein products from the three analysed transcripts, sequences deviating from reference sequence are depicted in orange. The Genotype‐Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project was supported by the Common Fund of the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health, and by NCI, NHGRI, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH, and NINDS. The data used for the analyses described in this manuscript were obtained from the GTEx Portal on 15/05/2020
FIGURE 3Basal exon skipping of CC2D2A exon 30 in kidney and human urine‐derived renal epithelial cells (hURECs) and correlation with tissue specific disease expression. (a) RT‐PCR using RNA isolated from human kidney, whole blood and hURECs. CC2D2A primer pair (arrows) designed to detect exon 30 skipping illustrated on the right. Note shortened transcript at ~150 bp (*asterisk) detected in kidney and hURECs suggesting basal exon 30 skipping. (b) Prevalence of kidney disease associated with truncating CC2D2A variants in different exons. Exons are labelled according to transcript ENST00000328236.9. The different exons and possible splice junctions detected in GTEx are shown below transcript ENST00000328236.9. The specific splice junction leading to basal exon 30 skipping in the kidney is marked in red. N indicates the total number of patients (with and without kidney disease) harbouring at least one truncating variants in the corresponding exons. 35/48 (73%) present with kidney disease. Note that both patients with a truncating variant in exon 30, undergoing basal exon skipping in the kidney, have no reported kidney disease (0%)
FIGURE 4Distribution of mutations in CEP120 and CC2D2A and identification of potential targets for exon skipping. (a) CEP120 mRNA (NM_153223.3) and exon structure with UTR in grey. Exon numbers are shown below exons with nucleotide numbers in multiples of three below the exon numbers. Exact multiples of three are shown in green. Protein domains are shown in colour‐code for coiled‐coil domain (CC) and the 3 C2 domains. Detected CEP120 variants are painted above the mRNA structure with respect to their location and allelic frequency in index patients (disc size reflecting allelic frequency). Variant consequences are colour‐coded as indicated. Exon numbers that appear as candidates for exons skipping based on nucleotide numbers and domain functions are shaded in green, while candidates arising from tissue‐specific transcript analysis are shaded in blue. (b) CC2D2A mRNA (NM_001080522.2) and exon structure with UTR in grey. Exon numbers are shown below exons with nucleotide numbers in multiples of three below the exon numbers. Exact multiples of three are shown in green. Protein domains are shown in colour‐code for coiled‐coil domain 1 and 2 (CC) and the C2 domain. Exon numbers that appear as candidates for exons skipping based on nucleotide numbers and domain functions are shaded in green, candidates arising from tissue‐specific transcript analysis are shaded in blue and possible candidate based on conflicting domain annotation shaded in turquoise. Only truncating CC2D2A variants that are reported in candidate exons for exon skipping are painted above the mRNA structure with respect to their location and allelic frequency in index patients (disc size reflecting allelic frequency). Variant consequences are colour‐coded as indicated. The retrotransposon insertion described in one family is not represented