Literature DB >> 29209597

Meckel-Gruber Syndrome: An Update on Diagnosis, Clinical Management, and Research Advances.

Verity Hartill1,2, Katarzyna Szymanska2, Saghira Malik Sharif1, Gabrielle Wheway3, Colin A Johnson2.   

Abstract

Meckel-Gruber syndrome (MKS) is a lethal autosomal recessive congenital anomaly syndrome caused by mutations in genes encoding proteins that are structural or functional components of the primary cilium. Conditions that are caused by mutations in ciliary genes are collectively termed the ciliopathies, and MKS represents the most severe condition in this group of disorders. The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle, projecting from the apical surface of vertebrate cells. It acts as an "antenna" that receives and transduces chemosensory and mechanosensory signals, but also regulates diverse signaling pathways, such as Wnt and Shh, that have important roles during embryonic development. Most MKS proteins localize to a distinct ciliary compartment called the transition zone (TZ) that regulates the trafficking of cargo proteins or lipids. In this review, we provide an up-to-date summary of MKS clinical features, molecular genetics, and clinical diagnosis. MKS has a highly variable phenotype, extreme genetic heterogeneity, and displays allelism with other related ciliopathies such as Joubert syndrome, presenting significant challenges to diagnosis. Recent advances in genetic technology, with the widespread use of multi-gene panels for molecular testing, have significantly improved diagnosis, genetic counseling, and the clinical management of MKS families. These include the description of some limited genotype-phenotype correlations. We discuss recent insights into the molecular basis of disease in MKS, since the functions of some of the relevant ciliary proteins have now been determined. A common molecular etiology appears to be disruption of ciliary TZ structure and function, affecting essential developmental signaling and the regulation of secondary messengers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meckel–Gruber syndrome; Shh signaling; oligohydramnios; primary cilium; renal cystic dysplasia; transition zone

Year:  2017        PMID: 29209597      PMCID: PMC5701918          DOI: 10.3389/fped.2017.00244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pediatr        ISSN: 2296-2360            Impact factor:   3.418


Clinical Features

Meckel–Gruber syndrome (MKS, OMIM number #249000), sometimes simply termed Meckel syndrome, was first described by Johann Friedrich Meckel in 1822. Meckel noted two siblings who died soon after birth with typical features that included occipital encephalocele, polycystic kidneys, and polydactyly (1). Gruber described the same condition later, naming it dysencephalia splanchnocystica (2). In the 1960s, the condition was further delineated by Opitz and Howe (3) with subsequent refinement of the diagnostic criteria (4–7). Meckel–Gruber syndrome is a lethal developmental syndrome characterized by posterior fossa abnormalities (most frequently occipital encephalocele) (Figures 1A,B), bilateral enlarged cystic kidneys (Figures 1C–E), and hepatic developmental defects that include ductal plate malformation associated with hepatic fibrosis and cysts (Figure 1F) (8). A common additional feature is postaxial polydactyly, usually affecting both hands and feet (Figure 1A), which is seen in 70–80% of cases (5–7, 9). Other occasional features, seen in 25–40% of fetuses include bowing and shortening of the long bones, abnormalities of the male genitalia, microcephaly or anencephaly, cleft lip and palate, and other craniofacial abnormalities, congenital heart defects, and pulmonary hypoplasia (5, 6, 8, 9). Rare features (seen in less than 20% of cases) include cystic dysplasia of the lungs or thyroid, retinal colobomata, and situs defects (8–14). Central nervous system (CNS) defects are considered to be obligate features of MKS but appear to have a variable presentation, varying between total craniorachischisis, partial defects of the corpus callosum, Dandy–Walker malformation, and most frequently occipital encephalocele (15).
Figure 1

Clinical features of Meckel–Gruber syndrome (MKS) and schematic of primary cilia structure. (A) Typical external features for a fetus with MKS at gestation age 16/40, showing typical clinical features comprising occipital encephalocele, massive flank masses due to bilateral renal cystic dysplasia, postaxial hexadactyly of all limbs, and a typical Potter’s sequence facies with a slanting forehead and flattened nose. (B,C) Ultrasound findings at 14+/40 weeks of gestation for MKS showing (B) encephalocele (arrowheads), and (C) large cystic kidneys (arrowhead). (D) Massive swelling of the abdomen of a fetus at gestation age 18+/40 with MKS due to grossly enlarged, cystic kidneys. (E) Hematoxylin-eosin staining of MKS fetal kidney at gestation age 18+/40 showing cystic dysplasia, comprising large, fluid-filled cysts, small cysts, and cystic swelling of the proximal tubules and glomeruli, with the absence of normal renal parenchyma. (F) Immunohistochemical staining of MKS fetal liver at gestation age 18+/40 for cytokeratin-19, showing the retention of embryonic bile duct structures (the ductal plate malformation) without the formation of patent bile ducts (arrowhead). PV, hepatic portal vein. (G) Left: simplified schematic of cilium ultrastructure (individual components are not to scale). For the purposes of clarity, the ciliary axoneme is represented by two doublets of microtubules (the A- and B-tubules; gray rods), and the nine-fold symmetry in the structure is indicated by dark gray ovals in the mother centriole. The axoneme is bound by ciliary membrane (red/brown line and shading). The ciliary transition zone (TZ) is characterized by Y-shaped links (pink) that mediate interactions with the ciliary membrane. The permeability barrier called the “ciliary gate” is indicated by the dashed pink ovals and pink shading, and is thought to consist of transition fibers and TZ proteins. Ciliary cargo proteins (purple) are trafficking by vesicular transport mediated by coordinated interactions between the Rab family of small GTPases (RAB11 and RAB8; R8), the RAB8 activator protein Rabin8 (R), and the exocyst protein complex (Ex) at the ciliary base. The exocyst tethers vesicles to the periciliary membrane, facilitating transport through the ciliary gate (green arrow), followed by transport within the cilium mediated by intraflagellar transport (IFT; dashed black arrows). Right: schematic of a TZ model, showing the possible location of TZ proteins mutated in MKS and related ciliopathies (pink ovals) forming the “MKS-JBTS module,” RPGRIP1L (blue oval) which is thought to be a component of a ciliary assembly module, and a third functional module (brown) that is associated with nephronophthisis (NPHP) proteins. The selective transport of cargo transmembrane proteins (lilac or purple) is indicated by arrows. The proteins include G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and effectors of the Shh signaling pathway (Smoothened and Patched). Images (A–C) are used by kind permission of Dr. Riitta Salonen (Rinnekoti Foundation, Helsinki, Finland) from the Robert J. Gorlin Slide Collection. JBTS, Joubert syndrome.

Clinical features of Meckel–Gruber syndrome (MKS) and schematic of primary cilia structure. (A) Typical external features for a fetus with MKS at gestation age 16/40, showing typical clinical features comprising occipital encephalocele, massive flank masses due to bilateral renal cystic dysplasia, postaxial hexadactyly of all limbs, and a typical Potter’s sequence facies with a slanting forehead and flattened nose. (B,C) Ultrasound findings at 14+/40 weeks of gestation for MKS showing (B) encephalocele (arrowheads), and (C) large cystic kidneys (arrowhead). (D) Massive swelling of the abdomen of a fetus at gestation age 18+/40 with MKS due to grossly enlarged, cystic kidneys. (E) Hematoxylin-eosin staining of MKS fetal kidney at gestation age 18+/40 showing cystic dysplasia, comprising large, fluid-filled cysts, small cysts, and cystic swelling of the proximal tubules and glomeruli, with the absence of normal renal parenchyma. (F) Immunohistochemical staining of MKS fetal liver at gestation age 18+/40 for cytokeratin-19, showing the retention of embryonic bile duct structures (the ductal plate malformation) without the formation of patent bile ducts (arrowhead). PV, hepatic portal vein. (G) Left: simplified schematic of cilium ultrastructure (individual components are not to scale). For the purposes of clarity, the ciliary axoneme is represented by two doublets of microtubules (the A- and B-tubules; gray rods), and the nine-fold symmetry in the structure is indicated by dark gray ovals in the mother centriole. The axoneme is bound by ciliary membrane (red/brown line and shading). The ciliary transition zone (TZ) is characterized by Y-shaped links (pink) that mediate interactions with the ciliary membrane. The permeability barrier called the “ciliary gate” is indicated by the dashed pink ovals and pink shading, and is thought to consist of transition fibers and TZ proteins. Ciliary cargo proteins (purple) are trafficking by vesicular transport mediated by coordinated interactions between the Rab family of small GTPases (RAB11 and RAB8; R8), the RAB8 activator protein Rabin8 (R), and the exocyst protein complex (Ex) at the ciliary base. The exocyst tethers vesicles to the periciliary membrane, facilitating transport through the ciliary gate (green arrow), followed by transport within the cilium mediated by intraflagellar transport (IFT; dashed black arrows). Right: schematic of a TZ model, showing the possible location of TZ proteins mutated in MKS and related ciliopathies (pink ovals) forming the “MKS-JBTS module,” RPGRIP1L (blue oval) which is thought to be a component of a ciliary assembly module, and a third functional module (brown) that is associated with nephronophthisis (NPHP) proteins. The selective transport of cargo transmembrane proteins (lilac or purple) is indicated by arrows. The proteins include G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and effectors of the Shh signaling pathway (Smoothened and Patched). Images (A–C) are used by kind permission of Dr. Riitta Salonen (Rinnekoti Foundation, Helsinki, Finland) from the Robert J. Gorlin Slide Collection. JBTS, Joubert syndrome. Renal cystic dysplasia is the most characteristic feature of MKS, but differs from those typical of polycystic kidney disease. The degree of cyst formation varies between individuals with MKS, but the kidneys will often be grossly enlarged, causing massive swelling of the abdomen (Figures 1A,D). Large, fluid-filled cysts are visible by eye in most affected individuals. However, in other small cysts, cystic changes of the proximal tubules and the absence of normal renal parenchyma are visible by microscopic investigation (Figure 1E). Cysts develop first in the glomeruli in the cortex, and cystogenesis progresses along the tubules and collecting ducts in the medulla. Abnormal fetal renal function is a frequent cause of oligohydramnios or anhydramnios, a common complication of an MKS pregnancy (7, 9). Potter’s sequence is frequent (pulmonary hypoplasia, growth restriction, club feet, and contractures) with a distinctive facies (comprising slanting forehead, flattened nose, and low-set ears) (Figure 1A), and is secondary to oligohydramnios or anhydramnios during pregnancy. In addition to cystic kidney dysplasia, hepatic involvement is an obligate feature of MKS (6). The typical histology shows bile duct proliferation and dilation (Figure 1F), associated with excess collagenous connective tissues (8), which are thought to arise from the incomplete development of the hepatic biliary system (16, 17).

Genetics and Allelism

Autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance for MKS is confirmed by equal occurrence in males and females, concordance in monozygotic twins, examples of affected siblings, and, in some cases, parental consanguinity. If the condition has occurred in previous pregnancies then the recurrence risk is 25%. The worldwide incidence of MKS has been estimated at 1 in 135,000 live births (18), but higher incidences of MKS are observed in endogamous populations, such as Gujarati Indians (19), Tatars (20), Hutterites (21), and in Finland (22) where 1 in every 9,000 live births is affected. MKS incidence is also higher in consanguineous populations, such as Kuwaiti Bedouin tribes (1 in 3,530 births) (23) and populations in Saudi Arabia (1 in 3,500 births) (24). Meckel–Gruber syndrome has extreme genetic heterogeneity and displays allelism with other ciliopathies such as Joubert syndrome (JBTS), COACH syndrome (cerebellar vermis hypo/aplasia, oligophrenia, congenital ataxia, ocular coloboma, and hepatic fibrosis), oro-facio-digital syndrome (OFD), nephronophthisis (NPHP), and Bardet–Biedl syndrome (BBS). To date, mutations in 14 genes (including TXNDC15) are identified as causative for MKS (Table 1). Mutations in a further three genes, specifically C5orf42 (25), CSPP1 (26), and CEP55 (27), are implicated on the basis of pathogenic private mutations in individual families with either MKS or MKS-like phenotypes (Table 1). Two other genes, comprising SEC8 (also known as EXOC4) (25) and EXOC3L2 (28), have private mutations as a cause of probable MKS phenotypes. In total, mutations in these genes appear to explain only 50–60% of MKS cases (28, 29).
Table 1

Summary of known MKS loci and identified genes.

LocusGeneEntrez gene IDAliasesLocationFounder mutation(s)Reference
MKS1MKS154903MKS, BBS13, JBTS2817q22Finnish c.1408-35_1408-7del29(30)
MKS2TMEM21651259JBTS2, CORS211q12.2Ashkenazi c.218G > T (p.R73L)(31, 32)
MKS3TMEM6791147JBTS6, NPHP11, MECKELIN8q22.1Pakistani c.1575 + 1G > A(33)
MKS4CEP29080184KIAA0373, 3H11AG, JBTS5, SLSN6, LCA10, BBS14, NPHP612q21.32(34)
MKS5RPGRIP1L23322KIAA1005, JBTS7, CORS3, FTM, NPHP816q12.2European c.1843A > C (p.T625P)(35, 36)
MKS6CC2D2A57545KIAA1345, JBTS94p15.32Finnish c.1762C > T (p.?)(37)
MKS7NPHP327031SLSN3, NPHP3, NPH3, RHPD13q22.1(38)
MKS8TCTN279867C12orf38, TECT2, JBTS2412q24.31(39)
MKS9B9D127077MKSR1, JBTS2717p11.2(40)
MKS10B9D280776MKSR219q13.2(41)
MKS11TMEM23179583JBTS2016q23.1(42)
NAC5orf4265250OFD6, JBTS175p13.2(25)
NACSPP179848JBTS21, CSPP8q13.1-q13.2(26)
MKS12KIF149928KIAA00421q32.1(43)
MKS13TMEM10784314JBTS29, PRO126817p13.1(44, 45)
NATXNDC1579770C5orf14, UNQ3355q31.1(28)
NACEP5555165CT111, URCC6, C10orf310q23.33(27)

Assigned locus names are listed, with unassigned ones indicated by NA. Alias names of genes or loci summarize the alternative gene symbols, names, and any reported allelism with other ciliopathies (indicated by the gene symbol or locus name). Any reported founder mutations in specific populations are also listed, in addition to the original gene discovery paper or papers.

CORS, cerebellar–ocular–renal syndrome; JBTS, Joubert syndrome; MKS, Meckel–Gruber syndrome; NPHP, nephronophthisis; OFD, oro-facio-digital syndrome; SLSN, Senior-Løken syndrome.

Summary of known MKS loci and identified genes. Assigned locus names are listed, with unassigned ones indicated by NA. Alias names of genes or loci summarize the alternative gene symbols, names, and any reported allelism with other ciliopathies (indicated by the gene symbol or locus name). Any reported founder mutations in specific populations are also listed, in addition to the original gene discovery paper or papers. CORS, cerebellar–ocular–renal syndrome; JBTS, Joubert syndrome; MKS, Meckel–Gruber syndrome; NPHP, nephronophthisis; OFD, oro-facio-digital syndrome; SLSN, Senior-Løken syndrome. Mutations in TMEM67, RPGRIP1L, and TMEM216 can cause both JBTS and MKS, demonstrating allelism between these conditions (31, 35, 36, 46) (Table 1). Biallelic mutations in the known MKS genes can also cause other related and allelic ciliopathies. Most notably, mutations in CEP290 (MKS4) can also occur in patients with NPHP (47), Senior-Løken syndrome (SLSN), JBTS (34), BBS (48), COACH syndrome (49), and Leber congenital amaurosis (50). The variable expressivity of the MKS phenotype can complicate the diagnosis of the condition, since this can extend to intra-familial variation for individuals that carry the same pathogenic mutation within families (31), even between monozygotic twins (7). The effect of non-Mendelian inheritance modes or the influence of genetic modifier alleles has frequently been proposed to explain some of this variation. However, in a cohort of JBTS patients who shared causal alleles but had discordant phenotypic features, digenic, or oligogenic inheritance modes were largely excluded as disease mechanisms (51). A second recent study suggests that ciliopathy phenotypes, including those for MKS, are allele-specific and that stochastic effects have a more important role on phenotypic variability than modifier alleles (28).

Genotype–Phenotype Correlations

In recent years, the identification of pathogenic alleles specific to MKS, limited genotype–phenotype correlations and founder mutations for particular ethnic groups (Table 1) have facilitated the rapid and accurate genetic diagnosis of this condition. Mutations in MKS1 cause ca. 7% of all MKS cases and ca. 70% cases in Finland. Most Finnish MKS patients share the common “Finn major” mutation (MKS1 IVS15-7_35del; Table 1), which is thought to have arisen in a founder of the Finnish population (52). Skeletal involvement including shortening and bowing of the long bones, polydactyly, and occipital encephalocele are frequently seen in patients with the Finn major mutation (18). More generally, MKS1 mutations are associated with higher rates of polydactyly and occipital encephalocele, bone dysplasia, cleft palate, and situs defects (52). All MKS1 mutations reported in MKS patients are null mutations, but a hypomorphic mutation has been reported in an individual with BBS (48), and recently in individuals with JBTS (53, 54). TMEM67 mutations are estimated to cause 16% of MKS cases (55), making them the most frequent cause of MKS. Both CNS malformations and polydactyly are less frequent in TMEM67-mutated individuals than those with MKS1 mutations (56). TMEM67 mutations also account for 57–83% (49, 55, 57) of the JBTS variant phenotype of COACH syndrome, demonstrating a strong genotype–phenotype correlation of TMEM67 mutations with hepatic developmental defects or coloboma (49, 58). This correlation indicates that JBTS patients with hepatic involvement are prioritized for TMEM67 mutation testing (57). Other genotype–phenotype correlations for MKS or JBTS have been identified by mutation type, or by the location of missense mutations within protein domains. For example, CC2D2A missense mutations are associated with JBTS whereas MKS is caused by null alleles (59). Missense mutations in exons 8–15 of TMEM67, particularly in combination with a second truncating mutation, are also associated with MKS (29, 55). Homozygous truncating mutations in RPGRIP1L are associated with MKS, whereas missense mutations (either in the homozygous state or compound heterozygous with a truncating mutation) are prevalent for JBTS patients. MKS phenotypes associated with RPGRIP1L mutations tend to be severe, including anencephaly and shortening and bowing of the long bones, in addition to the classic triad (36).

Diagnosis, Clinical Management, and Genetic Counseling

Meckel–Gruber syndrome is lethal in utero or immediately after birth, often due to pulmonary hypoplasia, although an unusual survivor has been described aged 28 months (60). MKS has a broad, multi-organ phenotype with considerable variation, but it is generally diagnosed by the presence of cystic kidney dysplasia (Figure 1C), in addition to at least one other hallmark feature of the disease. These comprise occipital encephalocele (Figure 1B), polydactyly (Figure 1A), or hepatic developmental abnormalities such as the ductal plate malformation (Figure 1F) (6, 7). The presence of abnormal intrahepatic bile ducts and cystic kidneys has been proposed to be invariant features of MKS and appears to be pathognomonic for the condition (6, 17). Salonen (6) has proposed that the minimal diagnostic criteria for MKS are CNS malformation, bilateral multicystic kidneys, and hepatic fibrotic changes. Transabdominal ultrasonography, performed at 10–14 weeks gestation, has been shown to successfully detect several of the fetal anomalies associated with MKS, including polycystic kidneys (from 9 weeks gestation), occipital encephalocele (from 13 weeks), and polydactyly (from 11 weeks), in both high-risk and low-risk pregnancies (Figure 1B) (60–64). Visualization can be compromised by oligohydramnios (65), but this is less problematic when performed in the first trimester of pregnancy (62). Further investigation of anomalies is possible by transvaginal scanning. Enlargement of the fetal trunk can give an early indication of multicystic renal dysplasia (66), in addition to unusually heterogeneous corticomedullary differentiation, reduced echogenicity of the medulla, increased echogenicity of the cortex, and the visualization of small medullary cysts (Figure 1C) (67). The fetal bladder can also be visualized by ultrasonography from 11 weeks, and the absence of a visible fetal bladder is often indicative of renal dysfunction. Fetal MRI is an alternative if ultrasonography findings are inconclusive or lack of amniotic fluid prevents clear imaging. MRI offers better soft-tissue resolution than ultrasonography, and can provide clearer images of intracranial structures to enable an accurate diagnosis of CNS malformations, but is rarely performed before 18 weeks gestation. Fetal movement and maternal aortic pulsation do not preclude a successful diagnosis of MKS using MRI (68), since imaging artifacts caused by fetal movement can be minimized by a fetal neuromuscular blockade (69) or general anesthesia of the mother. Transabdominal or vaginal endoscopy in the first trimester of pregnancy allows diagnosis of MKS by visualization of the surface anatomy of the embryo. Fetoscopy enables the direct observation of polydactyly and occipital encephalocele from 11 weeks gestational age (70). Prenatal diagnosis is also possible by using a combination of these imaging techniques, α-fetoprotein testing of amniotic fluid, and DNA testing of fetus and parents. For example, elevated levels of maternal α-fetoprotein during antenatal screening may be associated with MKS (61). Definitive diagnosis is often possible by using DNA testing to screen for mutations in the known MKS genes. Molecular diagnostic strategies include mutation screening of individual genes or targeted clonal sequencing of multi-gene panels. Single gene testing has low diagnostic sensitivity because of the absence of clear genotype–phenotype correlations for MKS. However, once a pathogenic variant in a family has been identified, then prenatal genetic diagnosis by chorionic villus sampling can be prioritized for at-risk pregnancies. Multi-gene panels can include MKS genes, and other ciliopathy genes of interest, that can be tested by sequence analysis and deletion/duplication analysis (71). However, their diagnostic sensitivity can vary between laboratories because panels can include genes that are unrelated to MKS. Referring clinicians should therefore decide which multi-gene panel has the best balance of sensitivity and affordability. If testing by a multi-gene panel does not confirm a clinical diagnosis of MKS, then more comprehensive testing by either whole-exome sequencing or whole-genome sequencing (WES or WGS) should be considered for obligate carriers. However, these tests may support or suggest unexpected diagnoses, in view of the broad range of possible differential diagnoses for MKS. These are extensive and include Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome, trisomy 13, hydrolethalus syndrome, and other related ciliopathies that include AR polycystic kidney disease, BBS, JBTS, and OFD. In particular, the prenatal features of BBS (polydactyly, renal defects, hepatic anomalies, genital hypoplasia, and heart malformations) can lead to a misdiagnosis of MKS (72). The extensive range of differential diagnoses and the broad allelism between different ciliopathies highlights the clinical need for accurate molecular diagnosis and the refinement of genotype–phenotype correlations (71, 73). Since MKS has an AR inheritance pattern, couples with a previously affected child should have the opportunity for genetic counseling with a medical professional in order to discuss the nature, inheritance, and implications of an MKS diagnosis. The possibility of prenatal testing needs appropriate counseling of parents if it is being considered for the purpose of pregnancy termination in addition to early diagnosis. Individual opinions regarding prenatal testing and pregnancy termination may depend on a number of factors such as religious and cultural beliefs, and previous experiences of the medical condition (74, 75). An accurate perception of their genetic risk, a clear impact of genetic disorder and previous experience of having an affected child can help parents to make an informed decision (76). It is therefore appropriate to discuss these issues at an early stage to ensure that families can make informed medical and personal decisions. With consanguineous MKS families, geneticists will encourage disclosure to at-risk relatives. The fact that these individuals often do not seek carrier testing suggests that many families are not sharing this information. In families with an AR disorder who practice consanguinity, the concern that their children’s carrier status would affect their marriage prospects can contribute to non-disclosure of this important information to their wider family (76–78). Furthermore, there is a widespread assumption among healthcare professionals that Muslim patients will not accept termination of pregnancy (79). However, under a fatwā (an Islamic legal pronouncement), termination of pregnancy is permitted before “ensoulment” at 120 days in cases of severe disability such as MKS, or where there is a risk to the mother’s life (75, 80), but knowledge of the fatwā is limited among Muslim populations (75, 81).

Insights into Molecular Pathomechanisms

The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle, projecting from the apical surface of vertebrate cells. It acts as an “antenna” that receives and transduces chemosensory and mechanosensory signals (Figure 1G). Primary cilia are thought to be hubs of developmental signaling that regulate diverse pathways such as Wnt and Shh that have essential roles during embryonic development. In particular, mutations MKS genes cause defective Shh signaling in several mouse models of ciliopathies (82–85). Primary cilia have a complex architecture that defines the compartmentalization of ciliary proteins, and many genes that are mutated in MKS encode proteins that localize to the ciliary TZ. This is a distinct molecular compartment located at proximal regions of cilia (86, 87) that has been defined by genetic and biochemical approaches to consist of protein complexes forming the so-called “MKS-JBTS module” (Figure 1G). The TZ connects the microtubules of the ciliary axoneme to the plasma and ciliary membranes, and it has been suggested to both limit and assist the regulated trafficking of cargo proteins and lipids into and out of the cilium (88). The TZ is therefore thought to modulate the composition of essential ciliary compartments such as the ciliary membrane, axoneme, and associated proteins (88). A recent study demonstrated that the disruption of ciliary TZ architecture causes JBTS (89), but how this affects ciliary trafficking and causes the MKS or other ciliopathy phenotypes remains a research question of paramount importance. Genetic, biochemical, and proteomic approaches have delineated the networks of protein-protein interactions that underlie the functional “MKS-JBTS module” at the TZ, as well providing insights into the structural basis of selective permeability at this ciliary compartment (90, 91). For example, several small tetraspanin-like transmembrane proteins (TMEMs) that are mutated as a cause of MKS and other ciliopathies (TMEM216, TMEM231, and TMEM107) appear to localize to the specialized ciliary membrane at the TZ. Other transmembrane proteins at this compartment include the Tectonic proteins (TCTN1, TCTN2, and TCTN3) and the Frizzled-like receptor TMEM67. In turn, the TMEM and Tectonic transmembrane proteins are likely to mediate interactions with and modulate the function of membrane-targeting proteins such as RPGRIP1L and CC2D2A that contain C2 domains (90, 91). TCTN1, for example, forms a biochemical complex at the TZ with CC2D2A, other ciliary transmembrane proteins (TCTN2, TMEM216, and TMEM67), and other known ciliopathy proteins (MKS1, CEP290, and B9D1) (92). The role of CEP290 and the B9 domain-containing proteins B9D1 (MKS9) and B9D2 (MKS10) at the TZ is undefined, but by analogy with the C2 domain-containing proteins, they are likely to mediate protein–protein interactions through their coiled-coil or B9 domains. One plausible model suggests that these proteins link TMEMs with either vesicular cargo at the TZ during the process of ciliogenesis, or then subsequently during the ciliary trafficking of cargo proteins through the TZ (Figure 1G). However, functional work on AHI1/jouberin, a ciliary TZ protein that contains WD40 and Src Homology 3 protein interaction domains, tends to support a general role for TZ proteins during vesicular trafficking because AHI1/jouberin interacts with RAB8A (93). RAB8A is an important small GTP/GDP-binding protein that is essential for vesicular protein trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus and plasma membrane (93). Interestingly, AHI/jouberin also directly interacts and sequestrates β-catenin (a downstream effector of canonical Wnt signaling) at the cilium (94, 95) and it therefore has functions that are additional and distinct to those of CEP290. Several recent studies have provided mechanistic insights into how the disruption of selective permeability at the TZ results in the incorrect trafficking of proteins at the cilium, with a focus on the trafficking of enzymes, receptors, and other transmembrane proteins involved in intracellular signaling. Although two TMEMs, TMEM17 and TMEM231, localize to the ciliary TZ, other TZ proteins (CC2D2A and B9D1) are required for TMEM231 localization to the TZ (82). In turn, these functional interactions in the TZ regulated the trafficking of ciliary G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs; somatostatin and serotonin receptors SSTR3 and HTR6) into the ciliary membrane, and both B9D2 and TMEM231 mutations caused defective ciliogenesis and Shh signaling in mice (82). In a separate study, loss of TCTN1 did not affect ciliogenesis, but nevertheless caused defective ciliary localizations of the transmembrane signaling proteins Smoothened and PKD2/polycystin-2, adenylyl cyclase 3 (ACIII; forming the secondary messenger cAMP), and ARL13B (a small Arf-family GTPase that localizes to the ciliary membrane) (92). Furthermore, the normal trafficking and localization of Smoothened at both the TZ and cilium is lost as a consequence of JBTS-associated mutations in RPGRIP1L that disrupt ciliary TZ architecture (89). In turn, the disruption of ciliary structure and function prevent Smoothened from mediating correct developmental Shh signaling (89). Disrupted compartmentalization could also prevent the correct ciliary transport of KIF7, a kinesin motor-protein that controls Shh signaling by regulating the amounts of activator and repressor isoforms of GLI transcription factors (96, 97). GLI proteins mediate gene expression changes as a consequence of Shh signaling, and the regulatory roles of KIF7 appear to be both negative, by preventing the incorrect activation of GLI2 in the absence of Shh ligand, and positive, by preventing the processing of GLI3 into the repressor isoform.

Future Perspectives

At the present time, the molecular cause for only 60% of cases can be explained by mutations in the known MKS genes (28, 29, 71). The entire series of causative genes for MKS, MKS-like, and related ciliopathy phenotypes are therefore incomplete, but the remaining genes will be either uncommon or carry private mutations that are likely to be represented by single families. However, the widespread use of targeted clonal sequencing techniques such as multi-gene panels and WGS now allows the affordable re-investigation of molecular causes in the known MKS genes for individuals that have previously been mutation negative. These studies are likely to identify potential pathogenic causes that include intronic mutations, copy number variations, and other genic variants in promoter sequences or cis-regulatory elements. Although this will improve diagnostic rates for MKS families, these efforts are complicated by both allelism and extreme phenotypic variability for MKS and related ciliopathies. The mechanistic basis of phenotypic variability in MKS still remains largely unclear, and it is undefined what the relative contributions are made by modifier alleles in other genes, in contrast to the general stochastic effects of variability in developmental signaling during embryogenesis. A future research challenge is to delineate the complex relationships between ciliary architecture and organization, and how these relate to and regulate ciliary function.

Author Contributions

VH, KS, SS, GW, and CJ made substantial contributions to the writing, drafting, and revision of this manuscript. All authors approved the final published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  94 in total

1.  Meckel-Gruber syndrome: ultrasonographic diagnosis at 13 weeks' gestational age in an at-risk case.

Authors:  A Pachì; A Giancotti; F Torcia; V de Prosperi; E Maggi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Meckel syndrome and neural tube defects in Kuwait.

Authors:  A S Teebi; Q A al Saleh; H Odeh
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Antenatal presentation of Bardet-Biedl syndrome may mimic Meckel syndrome.

Authors:  Houda Karmous-Benailly; Jelena Martinovic; Marie-Claire Gubler; Yoann Sirot; Laure Clech; Catherine Ozilou; Joëlle Auge; Nora Brahimi; Heather Etchevers; Eric Detrait; Chantal Esculpavit; Sophie Audollent; Géraldine Goudefroye; Marie Gonzales; Julia Tantau; Philippe Loget; Madeleine Joubert; Dominique Gaillard; Corinne Jeanne-Pasquier; Anne-Lise Delezoide; Marie-Odile Peter; Ghislaine Plessis; Brigitte Simon-Bouy; Hélène Dollfus; Martine Le Merrer; Arnold Munnich; Férechté Encha-Razavi; Michel Vekemans; Tania Attié-Bitach
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Study of the malformation of ductal plate of the liver in Meckel syndrome and review of other syndromes presenting with this anomaly.

Authors:  C Sergi; S Adam; P Kahl; H F Otto
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

5.  Midwives' perceptions of their role as facilitators of informed choice in antenatal screening.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Louise D Bryant; Phyllis Cole
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Mutations in TMEM216 perturb ciliogenesis and cause Joubert, Meckel and related syndromes.

Authors:  Enza Maria Valente; Clare V Logan; Soumaya Mougou-Zerelli; Jeong Ho Lee; Jennifer L Silhavy; Francesco Brancati; Miriam Iannicelli; Lorena Travaglini; Sveva Romani; Barbara Illi; Matthew Adams; Katarzyna Szymanska; Annalisa Mazzotta; Ji Eun Lee; Jerlyn C Tolentino; Dominika Swistun; Carmelo D Salpietro; Carmelo Fede; Stacey Gabriel; Carsten Russ; Kristian Cibulskis; Carrie Sougnez; Friedhelm Hildebrandt; Edgar A Otto; Susanne Held; Bill H Diplas; Erica E Davis; Mario Mikula; Charles M Strom; Bruria Ben-Zeev; Dorit Lev; Tally Lerman Sagie; Marina Michelson; Yuval Yaron; Amanda Krause; Eugen Boltshauser; Nadia Elkhartoufi; Joelle Roume; Stavit Shalev; Arnold Munnich; Sophie Saunier; Chris Inglehearn; Ali Saad; Adila Alkindy; Sophie Thomas; Michel Vekemans; Bruno Dallapiccola; Nicholas Katsanis; Colin A Johnson; Tania Attié-Bitach; Joseph G Gleeson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Meckel syndrome in different populations.

Authors:  I W Lurie; A N Prytkov; L V Meldere
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1984-08

Review 8.  Prenatal diagnosis of recurrent Meckel syndrome.

Authors:  H M Ramadani; H A Nasrat
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Joubert syndrome 2 (JBTS2) in Ashkenazi Jews is associated with a TMEM216 mutation.

Authors:  Simon Edvardson; Avraham Shaag; Shamir Zenvirt; Yaniv Erlich; Gregory J Hannon; Alan L Shanske; John Moshe Gomori; Joseph Ekstein; Orly Elpeleg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Founder mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in Meckel-Gruber syndrome and associated ciliopathies.

Authors:  Katarzyna Szymanska; Ian Berry; Clare V Logan; Simon Rr Cousins; Helen Lindsay; Hussain Jafri; Yasmin Raashid; Saghira Malik-Sharif; Bruce Castle; Mushtag Ahmed; Chris Bennett; Ruth Carlton; Colin A Johnson
Journal:  Cilia       Date:  2012-10-01
View more
  36 in total

1.  Tectocerebellar dysraphia with occipital encephalocele: a phenotypic variant of the TMEM231 gene mutation induced Joubert syndrome.

Authors:  Manal Nicolas-Jilwan; Ahmed Nasser Al-Ahmari; Mohammed Abdulaziz Alowain; Khaled Saleh Altuhaini; Essam Abdulaziz Alshail
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  [Ectopia of the pituitary].

Authors:  W Saeger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  The Pleiotropic Intricacies of Hedgehog Signaling: From Craniofacial Patterning to Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Mikhail Pakvasa; Andrew B Tucker; Timothy Shen; Tong-Chuan He; Russell R Reid
Journal:  FACE (Thousand Oaks)       Date:  2021-06-18

4.  Whole exome sequencing facilitated the diagnosis in four Chinese pediatric cases of Joubert syndrome related disorders.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Lihui Wang; Wenqi Chen; Jun Duan; Yanxin Meng; Huafang Yang; Qing Guo
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 5.  Insights Gained From Zebrafish Models for the Ciliopathy Joubert Syndrome.

Authors:  Tamara D S Rusterholz; Claudia Hofmann; Ruxandra Bachmann-Gagescu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Identification of Pathogenic Variants in RPGRIP1L with Meckel Syndrome and Preimplantation Genetic Testing in a Chinese Family.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Bingbing Wu; Yaqiong Wang; Yunyun Ren; Gang Li; Yanyan Qan; Caixia Lei; Huijun Wang
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Evaluation of novel compound variants of CEP290 in prenatally suspected case of Meckel syndrome through whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Meilian Peng; Shuai Han; Juan Sun; Xiaodong He; Yaer Lv; Liwei Yang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.473

8.  Network for Early Onset Cystic Kidney Diseases-A Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Approach to Hereditary Cystic Kidney Diseases in Childhood.

Authors:  Jens Christian König; Andrea Titieni; Martin Konrad
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Primary Cilia in Amacrine Cells in Retinal Development.

Authors:  Ke Ning; Brent E Sendayen; Tia J Kowal; Biao Wang; Bryan W Jones; Yang Hu; Yang Sun
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Prenatal Versus Postnatal Diagnosis of Meckel-Gruber and Joubert Syndrome in Patients with TMEM67 Mutations.

Authors:  Agnieszka Stembalska; Małgorzata Rydzanicz; Agnieszka Pollak; Grazyna Kostrzewa; Piotr Stawinski; Mateusz Biela; Rafal Ploski; Robert Smigiel
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.