Literature DB >> 33486721

A new preoperative risk score for predicting mortality of elderly hip fracture patients: an external validation study.

Zhicong Wang1, Xi Chen1, Ling Yang1, Hong Wang1, Wei Jiang1, Yuehong Liu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are common in the elderly and have a high risk of mortality. Several risk prediction models for mortality of hip fracture have been developed, but most of them are difficult to apply accurately in clinical practice. AIMS: The objective of the present study was to perform an external validation of a new published preoperative risk score for predicting mortality.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort study from January 2014 to December 2018 for elderly hip fracture patients discharged from a orthopedic center in China. The preoperative risk score was calculated for each patient, and further divided into two groups: low-risk group (score < 24 points) and high-risk group (score ≥ 24 points) using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The outcome was 30-day, 6-month and 1-year all-cause mortality, and the relationship between the risk score and mortality was assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The area under the curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plots were used to test the discrimination and calibration.
RESULTS: A total of 460 consecutive patients were included in the study, and high-risk score was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality [Hazard ratio (HR) 6.70; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.82-24.69; p = 0.004], 6-month mortality (HR 2.94; 95% CI 1.68-5.17; p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (HR 3.30; 95% CI 2.09-5.20; p < 0.001). Also, each point increase in the risk score resulted in a 11% increase in 30-day mortality (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.16; p < 0.001), 6% increase in 6-month mortality (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.09; p < 0.001), and 5% increase in 1-year mortality (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.07; p < 0.001). Moreover, the risk score had an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80-0.98) for 30-day mortality, 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.83) for 6-month mortality, and 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.81) for 1-year mortality. Calibration plots showed a good calibration between observed and predicted mortality, which was also demonstrated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
CONCLUSION: Our present study findings indicated that the preoperative risk score was an accurate mortality risk assessment tool for elderly hip fracture patients, regardless of short- and long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Hip fracture; Mortality; Prognosis; Risk score

Year:  2021        PMID: 33486721     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-01786-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  32 in total

1.  Estimating the future burden of hip fractures in Norway. A NOREPOS study.

Authors:  Gunhild Hagen; Jon Magnussen; Grethe Tell; Tone Omsland
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Didier Chalhoub; Ahmed M Kassem; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Regaining pre-fracture basic mobility status after hip fracture and association with post-discharge mortality and readmission-a nationwide register study in Denmark.

Authors:  Morten Tange Kristensen; Buket Öztürk; Niels Dieter Röck; Annette Ingeman; Henrik Palm; Alma B Pedersen
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Late-life depression and its impact on rehabilitation after traumatic injuries.

Authors:  Massimiliano Beghi; Cesare Maria Cornaggia; Madia Lozupone; Daniele Piscitelli; Cecilia Perin; Francesco Panza
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Burden of hip fracture using disability-adjusted life-years: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts in the CHANCES consortium.

Authors:  Nikos Papadimitriou; Konstantinos K Tsilidis; Philippos Orfanos; Vassiliki Benetou; Evangelia E Ntzani; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Annemarie Künn-Nelen; Ulrika Pettersson-Kymmer; Sture Eriksson; Hermann Brenner; Ben Schöttker; Kai-Uwe Saum; Bernd Holleczek; Francine D Grodstein; Diane Feskanich; Nicola Orsini; Alicja Wolk; Andrea Bellavia; Tom Wilsgaard; Lone Jørgensen; Paolo Boffetta; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Antonia Trichopoulou
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2017-04-11

Review 6.  Gender and race/ethnicity differences in hip fracture incidence, morbidity, mortality, and function.

Authors:  Robert S Sterling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Predictors of early failure of the cannulated screw system in patients, 65 years and older, with non-displaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Carlo Biz; Jacopo Tagliapietra; Filippo Zonta; Elisa Belluzzi; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Liver disease and mortality among patients with hip fracture: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jonathan Montomoli; Rune Erichsen; Henrik Gammelager; Alma B Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Time of admission and mortality after hip fracture: a detailed look at the weekend effect in a nationwide study of 55,211 hip fracture patients in Norway.

Authors:  Andreas Asheim; Sara Marie Nilsen; Marlen Toch-Marquardt; Kjartan Sarheim Anthun; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Johan Håkon Bjørngaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association Between Monocyte Count and Preoperative Deep Venous Thrombosis in Older Patients with hip Fracture: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Zhicong Wang; Qing Zhou; Hailong Liu; Jianjun Zhang; Zhonglun Zhu; Jijun Wu; Xue Chen; Yuehong Liu
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.512

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.