Literature DB >> 33484910

Influences of the 3D microenvironment on cancer cell behaviour and treatment responsiveness: A recent update on lung, breast and prostate cancer models.

Lara S Costard1, Ryan R Hosn2, Harumi Ramanayake1, Fergal J O'Brien3, Caroline M Curtin4.   

Abstract

The majority of in vitro studies assessing cancer treatments are performed in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers and are subsequently validated in in vivo animal models. However, 2D models fail to accurately model the tumour microenvironment. Furthermore, animal models are not directly applicable to mimic the human scenario. Three-dimensional (3D) culture models may help to address the discrepancies of 2D and animal models. When cancer cells escape the primary tumour, they can invade at distant organs building secondary tumours, called metastasis. The development of metastasis leads to a dramatic decrease in the life expectancy of patients. Therefore, 3D systems to model the microenvironment of metastasis have also been developed. Several studies have demonstrated changes in cell behaviour and gene expression when cells are cultured in 3D compared to 2D and concluded a better comparability to cells in vivo. Of special importance is the effect seen in response to anti-cancer treatments as models are built primarily to serve as drug-testing platforms. This review highlights these changes between cancer cells grown in 2D and 3D models for some of the most common cancers including lung, breast and prostate tumours. In addition to models aiming to mimic the primary tumour site, the effects of 3D cell culturing in bone metastasis models are also described. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Most in vitro studies in cancer research are performed in 2D and are subsequently validated in in vivo animal models. However, both models possess numerous limitations: 2D models fail to accurately model the tumour microenvironment while animal models are expensive, time-consuming and can differ considerably from humans. It is accepted that the cancer microenvironment plays a critical role in the disease, thus, 3D models have been proposed as a potential solution to address the discrepancies of 2D and animal models. This review highlights changes in cell behaviour, including proliferation, gene expression and chemosensitivity, between cancer cells grown in 2D and 3D models for some of the most common cancers including lung, breast and prostate cancer as well as bone metastasis.
Copyright © 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D cancer models; Bone metastasis; Breast cancer; Extracellular matrix; Lung cancer; Prostate cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33484910     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  8 in total

1.  Long-term cultured microvascular networks on chip for tumor vascularization research and drug testing.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Zhichang Du; Tianying Yuan; Jiajun Huang; Xiaoyu Zhao; Shengli Mi
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.258

2.  Modelling acute myeloid leukemia (AML): What's new? A transition from the classical to the modern.

Authors:  Annachiara Dozzo; Aoife Galvin; Jae-Won Shin; Santo Scalia; Caitriona M O'Driscoll; Katie B Ryan
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.671

Review 3.  Lung Models to Evaluate Silver Nanoparticles' Toxicity and Their Impact on Human Health.

Authors:  Jesús Gabriel González-Vega; Juan Carlos García-Ramos; Rocio Alejandra Chavez-Santoscoy; Javier Emmanuel Castillo-Quiñones; María Evarista Arellano-Garcia; Yanis Toledano-Magaña
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.719

4.  A new cell-sized support for 3D cell cultures based on recombinant spider silk fibers.

Authors:  Dganit Stern-Tal; Shmulik Ittah; Ella Sklan
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  An Osteosarcoma Model by 3D Printed Polyurethane Scaffold and In Vitro Generated Bone Extracellular Matrix.

Authors:  Nicola Contessi Negrini; Claudio Ricci; Federica Bongiorni; Luisa Trombi; Delfo D'Alessandro; Serena Danti; Silvia Farè
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Non-destructive monitoring of 3D cell cultures: new technologies and applications.

Authors:  Marilisa Cortesi; Emanuele Giordano
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 7.  Clinical Application Perspectives of Lung Cancers 3D Tumor Microenvironment Models for In Vitro Cultures.

Authors:  Irena Wieleba; Kamila Wojas-Krawczyk; Paweł Krawczyk; Janusz Milanowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Characterisation of 3D Bioprinted Human Breast Cancer Model for In Vitro Drug and Metabolic Targeting.

Authors:  Titanilla Dankó; Gábor Petővári; Regina Raffay; Dániel Sztankovics; Dorottya Moldvai; Enikő Vetlényi; Ildikó Krencz; András Rókusz; Krisztina Sipos; Tamás Visnovitz; Judit Pápay; Anna Sebestyén
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.